1. I know a bit about how the analytics thing works. It's why I'm not easy to track on-line. Pretty much only if I want to be tracked. The other day I allowed some cookies to set. This will explain how the GRU attack will go. Hopefully help you spot when your being engaged by
2. the GRU.
I decided to look at new cars. I knew that these are robust analytics customers so then I put my data in I started getting emails & then, on @Twitter, the brand I was looking at popped up on my timeline feed. Now, imagine it wasn't a car but I was on @Facebook or
3. @Instagram, sites with rather good identification data, discussing politics and who I was going to vote for. What if I said I was un-decided? Like bread on the water the little fish would all swim to me. But now imagine that they already have the stolen
4. voter data. Not just stuff like I gave the car dealer but your phone number, email, polling place and the most important thing, your voting frequency. Higher the better. Analytics folks then massage data to determine if you're worth time to try to sway if yes, you're handed
5. to the Sock Puppet army in St. Petersburg or San Antonio to apply the content that will most likely sway you. They have your inner-thoughts thanks to Facebook. The programing identifies it and produces the content for deployment at the exact moment it will have a chance of
6. setting the hook. Then right before the election, they will attack. All because @facebook or some other online provider betrayed you to an enemy force. If they do it again, I commit to breaking them up into separate companies each for of the states and DC and Territories
7. and one or more for foreign nations except Canada and Mexico. They get to stay because they're stuck with us. Foreigners can interact but we'll know they're foreigners and their content would be flagged for FARA compliance especially during an election cycle.
1. Not clear if it's just election window dressing for Trump to look tough on Al-Qaeda and ISIS after surrendering parts of Syria to them and their Turkish enablers but there are signs of something changing in the relationship. First the @StateDept issued a terrorist threat
2. warning for Americans in Istanbul. This came after the Turkish forces withdrew from an area of western Syria held by the Assad regime. In what appears to have been either a re-deployment of that force or possibly another force the Assad regime has engaged in an artillery
3. barrage that is preventing the Turkish Army from establishing a base in rebel held Kansafra in southern Idlib that is north of the area from which the Turkish forces withdrew. In that attack, Russian forces appear to be directing fire in an apparent attempt to avoid hitting
1.A reminder what really happened in 2016. 11 days out here's a comparison of poll averages. @HillaryClinton was 3.9% ahead. @JoeBiden is 7.9%. With Hillary in a much closer position, James Comey, under pressure from the @HouseGOP & @SenateGOP broke policy and IMO violated 6(e).
2. That opened the door to a massive #GRU direct action attack, mostly on @Facebook, that targeted @TheDemocrats who were wavering in their support and interest and who were identified by Cambridge Analytics by Facebook violating its own policies in a few key precincts.
3. That swung WI, MI and PA to Trump. It was brilliant but it was an act of war facilitated by Americans and an FBI head who violated the rules and the faith. Mueller, under the gun, was not able or willing to identify the members of Congress.
1. I was about the only person reporting on the Russian attack in 2016. I announced it on July 24, 2016. I didn't get it from the MSM I got it from being in the troll attacks on @Twitter that I recognized after two years of dealing with them over Russia's Ukraine invasion.
2. The data they hacked will be used on @Facebook@instagram, @YouTube and to a small degree on @Twitter. If you're a high frequency #DemocraticParty voter and show any doubts on @JoeBiden on social media, expect the Russians to identify you and hammer your accounts with what
3. ever you have said publicly that was critical of @JoeBiden. The best thing you can do is to get off of @Facebook@instagram and to a lesser degree @YouTube. I think @Twitter is safer, because folks are working as a lifeguards in the deep end.
1. This was the earlier order on Maxwell redactions.
The following transaction was entered on 10/22/2020 at 8:25 AM EDT and filed on 10/22/2020
Case Name: Giuffre v. Maxwell
Case Number:1:15-cv-07433-LAP
Filer:
WARNING: CASE CLOSED on 05/25/2017
Document Number:1136
Docket Text: 2. ORDER: The Court has reviewed the parties' proposed redactions that were provided to the Court for in camera review on the evening of October 21, 2020. The Court has approved Ms. Giuffre's proposed redactions and has
3. ordered limited additional redactions, identified by the Court in its review of both parties' proposed redactions, relating to (1) personally identifiable information and (2) the identities of certain nonparties mentioned in the
1. Reposted from 12/17 #Russianbots: Here's how I think voter data was used. Background: July 2016, I had reason to investigate what I thought was a theft of Hawaii Democratic Party data. It turns out it wasn't but I learned from the data firm that Democrats use the database
2. contained 4 fields. The fields are 1. Name; 2. District; 3. ID Document; and 4. Voter frequency. Name, District and frequency were likely used to target the key precincts in the three key swing states. Knowing that a person is going to vote and is in the Democrats database
3. is statistical gold. But work would have to be done to reach these targeted voters. That's where data from social media and brokers like Google would provide a reference database to merge with the voter data. In the end they would have email, Facebook and Twitter accounts of