@amazon@JavierespFT Should add: these are just charges against Amazon, not remedies/fines (yet). That’s the next step.
Announcement expected any minute now. Watch along here bit.ly/2OhFz0q
Waiting for @Vestager to take the stage. Worth noting: Commission is about to drop a bunch of new competition proposals aimed at ‘gatekeepers’ like Amazon, Googlel & Facebook in early December.
The timing of this announcement is, um, interesting.
@amazon .@Vestager: “This is a case about big data.” Says that this is about how Amazon collects data across its entire marketplace, not about its data collection on one specific third-party seller
@amazon@vestager Stat: Vestager says Amazon only provides its own label goods in 10% of overall products, but generates 50% of profits in those specific categories
For me, this 2nd investigation, into Amazon’s ‘buy box,’ is bigger issue. Why? It’s about pushing third-party retailers into Amazon’s ecosystem — crucial if Amazon is seen as dominant “gatekeeper”
That investigation will likely take at least a year.
@Apple@Facebook@simonvandorpe Interesting from @Vestager: “There is now a global conversation about how to deal with the fact that some of the platforms seem to be either gatekeepers or de facto monopolies in a number of markets that are very important for the development of our economies."
Couple of interesting things from today’s @Amazon#antitrust announcement:
By charging that Amazon misused third-party sellers data for its own benefit, Commission is calling BS on Amazon’s long-held view that there’s a Chinese wall over over how that data is collected/used.
In its new investigation today, there are hallmarks of how Brussels went after Google in vertical shopping search — favoring itself/others who used its other services in different market.
Also: market defintion — Commission pretty much drawing a circle around Amazon’s online marketplace model, whereas Amazon says it’s a small fry in the wider retail world.
That’s going to end up in the appeal if/when that comes down
Also: warning on coverage that says Amazon will be fined tens of billions of $$. Sure, that’s the possible maximum fine. But, in all likelihood, any possible fine will be significant less than that
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On Friday, a battle broke out between @Facebook & researchers at @nyuniversity about efforts to boost transparency about how voters are being targeted w/ political ads ahead of US election. politico.com/news/2020/10/2…
A thread on what this all means.
<<cracks knuckles>>
Let's start off w/ political ads. There's massive money being spent on these ads -- estimates of $230 MILLION alone in week before FB bans political ads in the US as of tomorrow. That is not a small amount of money, to be clear.
FB says that this NYU plug-in breaks its polices (most likely around privacy) and that it takes seriously any efforts by third-parties (cough, Cambridge Analytica, cough) to access its users' data.
With just over a week before US election, @facebook is pushing to stop a digital tool that promotes transparency around online political ads politico.com/news/2020/10/2…
It’s not the first time the company has tried to block these browser plug-ins that allow people to share which political ads are served up to them. @propublica’s own efforts ran into trouble with FB last year over same issue
FB says these tools break its policies, mostly on privacy grounds. But there’s a big Cambridge Analytica shadow over all of this —
Third-party services that access FB users’ data isn’t exactly kosher with FB, amirite?
Yellow Jacket protestors in France. Anti-vax campaigners in Italy. Brexit supporters in UK.
Despite their differences, they have one thing in common: a growing use of #QAnon language & ideas — particularly against anti-lockdown #COVID19 measures politi.co/2Hv08H5
I spent weeks tracking QAnon’s development over Europe, across multiple platforms & 6 languages, to see what’s going on.
First: this is not just a far-right thing. People are on the left have similarly embraced QAnon’s ideas of anti-govt/anti-elite.
Second: While QAnon, itself, is still on the fringe of the fringe, its ideas & languages are quickly being blended w/ well-entrenched domestic groups across UK, Germany, France, Italy, Spain, & the Netherlands.
That’s particularly true in anti-lockdown movement across EU.
A Spanish-language @Facebook page, Alerta Politica, attacked Trump. Another, Politica Veraz, went after Biden. Both had bigger footprints on FB than @BostonGlobe. But behind the partisan news, both pages were run by the same individual politico.com/news/2020/10/1…
Not exactly the type of story that I thought I would be doing ahead of November's election. But since the summer, I had noticed these Spanish-language FB pages were getting massive engagement on FB. I started to dig around.
Couple of things first stood out. The FB pages kinda looked the same in style. They mirrored each other in content, too. Just one was pro-Biden, the other was pro-Trump. Neither page provided much transparency about who was running them.
So I’ve been away for a while, but finally got my head around major decision from Europe’s top court last month involving @Facebook, @maxschrems & $$ billions in data sent from EU to US.
Stay with me here, this gets weird, real quick.
<<cue thread>>
So the basics: Schrems complained to Ireland’s #privacy watchdog that FB wasn’t protecting his data when it was transferred to US. Why? Because @Snowden revelations showed US govt was tracking FB data (w/o telling anyone).
Naughty, naughty
FB balked, so did the Irish. It all got sent to court, eventually landing w/ EU's highest judges.
Questions in play: 1) Should Irish regulator stop FB from transferring data to US? 2) Does US sufficiently protecting EU citizens’ data? 3) How should data be moved outside of EU?
ICYMI -- This announcement is coming today at noon, Brussels time. But you don't have to wait that long -- we already reported everything that's coming HT: @laurenscerulus@LauKaya 👇
FWIW -- this is the EU trying to get ahead of #misinformation as part of wider push to overhaul online content rules -- a package a proposals that will be outlined by end of year.
Expect lots of chat today about the need to boost resources for official disinformation teams within the EU (ironic b/c those teams have struggled to get funding for their work for year. Me from 2017 nytimes.com/2017/02/20/wor…)