This is really good. All eyes are on the EU FTA, but there's a lot to get over the line with third countries around the world just to maintain the status quo. We might get a deal with the EU, and still end up with no-deal with Mexico, Canada, Singapore and others.
To be fair to govt, there has been plenty of focus on continuity deals, but as with all things Brexit, the system has been given too little time, and some things might fall through the gaps.
Some continuity deals have also spent a long time in the "too difficult" pile in DIT. This was definitely the case with Turkey, a crucial market for automotive, food and drink, and textiles.
Govt. never worked out what to do about Turkey in the event of no-deal since Turkey can only agree a deal with the UK if the UK has a deal with the EU. Losing preferential trade with Turkey will have a serious impact of some important sectors.
My bet is still that we get a deal with the EU, so a deal with Turkey shld also be coming, but if govt. tactic is to run the clock down on Brussels, they are also running it down on Ankara. We might end up without a deal with Turkey on 1st Jan by accident.
As for other big markets, Canada is a v. interesting case study. Negotiations on a continuity deal were progressing last year, until the UK published it's no-deal tariff schedules. Canada took one look, thought "these look good", and told the UK there was no need to keep talking.
Things have moved on a bit now, but this is indicative of the interrelationship of all the negotiations. Agreeing a deal with the EU doesn't just impact relations with the EU, but negotiations with a whole host of other countries.
So this is a right old complicated web of negotiations that are all going on at the same time, under huge pressure and the disruption of the pandemic. Mistakes are bound to be made, but at least Parl. will pick those up when it scrutinises and ratifies each FTA. Oh, wait...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Interesting article from @JGForsyth on the geo-political impact of no-deal, but it’s been obvious for quite a while that the UK/EU relationship has been seriously wounded by Brexit & four yrs of insults (both petty & serious) and acrimonious negotiations. thetimes.co.uk/article/no-dea…
Deal, or no-deal, the UK and the EU are now set up to be economic rivals. The rushed negotiation on the future relationship ensures that there will be numerous loose ends come the end of the yr and disputes are almost inevitable.
At the beginning of the year, Pascal Lamy said that these negotiations would result in a “geopolitical and geoeconomic rivalry…[couched] in nice friendly diplomatic language”. He’s right, although the nice language is often absent.
Some future gazing regarding #Brexit. Two possible scenarios for consideration, and under both, Brexit just doesn’t go away.
1.We get a deal this year. It's thin for goods, with the benefits broadly limited to zero tariffs, at least on paper if not always in practice (see rules of origin & #automotive), & largely non-existent for services.
This new FTA world comes with considerable new cost that sends some businesses to the wall, and new friction that will cause significant disruption in some places (see Kent), but not everywhere.
...Sounds pretty cool, if a bit old. But, it's a multilateral treaty, rather than an Australia deal with the EU. Plus it doesn’t relate to trade. Not to worry, there are loads of others.
Some future gazing on #Brexit. Two possible scenarios under consideration...
1. We get a deal before the end of the transition. It's thin for goods, with the benefits broadly limited to zero tariffs, at least on paper if not always in practice (see rules of origin &#automotive), & largely nonexistent for services.
The new world of trading on an FTA comes with considerable new cost that sends some businesses to the wall, and new friction that will cause significant disruption in some places (see Kent), but none in others.