The PM's statement contains a serious set of commitments. If they're delivered, they’ll take a big chunk off UK emissions over the next decade and beyond.
As ever - the detail needs to follow. But for now, I'm pleased. We should celebrate days like this when we get them.
Others have done the detailed commentary (thank you @DrSimEvans). Main thing to say is that this is a vision with some *breadth*.
We’ve become used to piecemeal announcements – this is more like it.
We have meaningful new commitments on transport, power, industry, hydrogen, heat, CCS and woodland creation. It's a statement that a more fully-fledged UK strategy is now emerging.
Notable that the framing is 'jobs and industry'. This is the Prime Minister telling us that the economic recovery from Covid and the UK’s continued prosperity can rest on green jobs and green investment.
Hard to argue with that.
It’s not framed as an environmental mission.
Absent on jobs is how the transition overall can be well-managed. Employment will grow in many areas, but it will shrink in others, so skills support and retraining very important. Employment impacts – particularly in manufacturing industries – can be regionally concentrated.
The 2030 commitment to phase-out sales of petrol and diesel cars and vans is *massive*. It’s a transport commitment, a consumer commitment, and an industry commitment. Crucially, it will drive fundamental change in the whole energy system. So its impact can’t be overstated.
We haven't modelled a separate target for plug-in hybrids, but it really needs to be a niche thing after 2030.
By 2030, 40% of cars on the road will need to be zero carbon, to be on track for Net Zero. A big challenge to get infrastructure ready and consumer incentives right.
We’ll see 600,000 heat pumps a year deployed by 2028. That’s significant – may not be the deployment rate we need to get to, but it’s a good start.
I understand the Future Homes Standard will come in from 2023, which is great.
Good that the Green Homes Grant has been extended
The hydrogen and CCS commitments are decent too – very much in line with the idea that solutions must be piloted at scale.
We lack the info on the market mechanisms that will deliver commercial investment though. I'm hoping the fabled Energy White Paper will fill the gaps here.
I was expecting more on nuclear, so that is notable by its absence. Perhaps that’s for another day? I think I learned more from Rolls Royce a few days ago about new nuclear than I did from today’s statement. No words on Sizewell was a surprise.
On woodland creation, planting 30,000 hectares of trees every year is now a real Net Zero commitment – still at the bottom end of what we think we’ll need, but great to see.
Lots of new employment too - which can begin immediately.
But, oh boy, we have to reach a better, more grown-up discussion of costs.
Some of the commentary today has been woeful on this.
Govt probably *undersold* the investment impact of these plans (a first). Private offshore wind investment alone would dwarf the £12bn they refer to.
We need to separate the issues.
There are investment costs - majority will be private investment, with some public investment alongside.
Then there's the net impact on costs across the economy. There’s a huge fuel saving and energy efficiency gain from Zero carbon investments.
And then we need to separate that from the actual economic impacts. These could be very positive if all this investment is front-loaded and occurs as we recover from the Covid economic impacts, while there's spare capacity in the economy.
No – it won’t cost £1trillion. Such a misleading figure, so it's time to put it to bed.
And there’s a lot more than £4bn of investment taking place as a result of this package.
We’ll have more on this on December 9th. It’s going to be one of the major themes of our next report.
But overall, this is a good statement from the PM.
A vision statement rather than a plan. But necessary nonetheless.
This is the first part of what I hope we’ll now see in the remainder or 2020.
Next up is the Spending Review and Infrastructure Strategy - and hopefully the Energy White Paper.
And a new international commitment with a strong 2030 UK NDC. We’ll advise on that in a few weeks.
2021 and beyond needs to be about delivery, delivery, delivery.
Tweets have been light recently while we prepare for a very busy period ahead. We’re about to bring you a *lot* of new analysis, insight and commentary.
A rundown of what’s coming up soon from @theCCCuk.
THREAD
There are four themes to our work for the year prior to #COP26
1) Achieving Net Zero in the UK. 2) The UK’s international climate focus. 3) Climate risk and adaptation. 4) New scrutiny of progress
Let’s look at each, starting with the first...
On December 9 we publish our Sixth Carbon Budget advice. It's a biggie: advice on the transition all the way to #NetZero.
New sectoral insights
New investment numbers, profiled over time
New cost / benefit analysis
New Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland pathways
New policy advice
This week brings two important new reports on Net Zero.
The @NetZeroUK report will be published on Thursday (more on that later), but today we have a new report from the @instituteforgov.
A few reflections on the IfG report in this thread.
This is an important report because it’s a serious review of governance and preparation for Net Zero in government.
The 'governance gap’ is something that we have highlighted in @theCCCUK reports. It’s great to see @instituteforgov look at the issues with their expert eye.
It is published as the COVID-19 restrictions begin to ease and we begin to get to grips with the economic crisis. Can this crisis be turned into an opportunity?
Our clear advice to Ministers is to use pro-climate steps as the basis of the UK’s economic and social recovery. Anchor the plan to kickstart the economy in the outcomes that were already implied by the UK’s climate goals.
We already know what must be achieved. So go for it.
Pre-COVID, policy progress this year was notably better than the year before, but not enough to be on track for Net Zero.
We highlight the welcome shift in ambition from the @transportgovuk - and continued progress in Power. But we still need policies to deliver on ambition.
👇
We’ve written to the Treasury, ahead of the Budget on 6 November
Our letter covers two important things 1) News that @theCCCuk will offer advice on the 6th Carbon Budget early, in September 2020 2) Our expectations for the @HMTreasury Net Zero review
We’re going early with our advice on Carbon Budget 6 (2033-37) because we can see that it can play a meaningful part of the UK’s new strategy for decarbonising ahead of hosting COP26 in Glasgow.
A successful presidency rests on demonstrating credible domestic plans for net zero.
Our advice on Carbon Budget 6 is a little bit more than just a new emissions target for the 2033-37 period.
It’s really the detailed ‘net zero’ pathway from today to mid 2030s.
After 2037, there won’t be much more than a decade to the net zero goal. So this is a big deal.
We recommend that the aviation and shipping sectors should themselves reach #NetZero, requiring a major effort from Government and industry. These are international challenges, requiring an international response, but bringing them into the UK target will drive the pace of change
#Shipping emissions can be reduced to zero or near zero through the use of alternative fuels. We have considered the use of hydrogen and ammonia for example.
This was what HMT call an 'RDEL' event (bit.ly/2SCYdjH). In other words, a review of government's resource spend. It isn't intended to move major capital programmes (that's for next year). It's also only a one-year review.
In these circumstances, it was always going to be difficult to achieve the major shifts in #netzero policies, many of which are infrastructure focused, few of which are about resource expenditure.
A cynic might say that achieving these shifts before an election is also unlikely.
Given the constraints of this Spending Review, there are some grounds for optimism.
The extra £30m for BEIS, which is receiving lots of negative attention, is 'admin' (ie staff) and programme expenditure. That's a potentially huge increase in staffing on #netzero. That's good.