Don't get me wrong - there might be good reason for not saying anything. But had Verhofstadt still been doing Brexit coordination for the EP you can be sure it would not be this quiet!
OK, I admit that this research of mine is perhaps not the most complete - there might be other sources and quotes somewhere buried in newspapers or news portals.
However I cannot escape the impression that - in public at least - in this stage of Brexit, the EP is not playing an active role.
If a Brexit Deal does emerge then the EP is going to have to rubber stamp it (or not) but has not been an active public player.
/ends
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm sorry for my hard line on grace periods, implementation periods for 🇬🇧, post 1 Jan - but 🇪🇺 must resist them
While I have some sympathy for the mess facing Brits and firms, the cause of this problem is completely and squarely with 🇬🇧 Government
Until 🇬🇧 Govt owns (or is forced to own) the mess it has caused there will be no change
And yes, it might require a metaphorical rubbing of Michael Gove's nose in it, in the bottom of a portaloo on the hard shoulder of the M20. But so be it
As @SnellArthur rightly put it, it's odd that "'taking back control', is giving the French port authorities the ability to bring your economy to its knees"
Sorry, that boat has sailed. 5 months ago actually.
If the UK asks for this now, the EU's going to go 🤣 we offered you this - 2 years if you wanted it! - and you refused in June. Do tell us why we should give this to you now please?
Also, related - a grace period is *not* the same as extending transition. You could likewise call it an implementation period.
But the essence of this - that Britain left at a time of its own choosing, but was itself ill prepared - remains true.
The EU could offer such periods to the UK, but there would be a political and even possibly a direct financial price demanded from the EU for that - and that I suspect is something the UK side is not going to contemplate.
When the transition period ends in 6 weeks, the UK can move to a thin trade Deal with the EU, or No Deal
Both options are practically fraught
Even a Deal comes with some disruption - especially at Dover. And businesses have to cope with the headaches of leaving the Single Market and the Customs Union
My timeline is full of earnest think tankers saying thinks along the lines of "Boris Johnson wants a Deal because he wants a success" and "Business / the economy wants a Deal, so Johnson does"
I am really far from sure this is the case
Here's why
A slightly more structured way to put it is as follows:
Boris Johnson wants success
Boris Johnson is Prime Minister
Prime Ministers are considered successful by doing the right thing for the country's economy
A Deal is better for the economy
= Johnson will aim for Deal
But this does not hold
The changes to the WA, and the NI Protocol, that Johnson agreed last year were *more damaging* to the economy than May's Deal
Hard Brexit that Johnson has long advocated is more damaging to the economy than a Soft Brexit