Ahead of the ADP release at 8:15am, a brief thread on what high-frequency private data is suggesting we'll get for November payrolls, why it might be right, and why it might be wrong. /1
Note that I've augmented my high-frequency payrolls model to more explicitly address autocorrelation. /2
Data from Homebase, Kronos/UKG, and UI claims is consistent with November payroll employment growing at -515K to -228K seasonally-adjusted (-198K to +93K non-seasonally-adjusted). /3
This approach has been decent in one-step forecasts in the past. For example, using just data through September, this approach would have predicted +574K to +839K SA for October out-of-sample (actual was +638K SA), and +1,353K to +1,621K NSA (actual was +1,605K NSA). /4
But I think it's also useful to play the mental exercise of waking up & finding out your model is wrong, forcing thoughts a priori about why that might happen. Some metrics such as the Markit PMI and the Real-Time Population Survey suggest jobs growth in November. /5
I think there are 2 main possibilities for why Homebase & Kronos might be off this month. One is gradual drift: as the composition of the recovery shifts over time, firms that specialize in small business scheduling become less and less representative of the whole economy. /6
I wouldn't expect this data to suddenly become massively unrepresentative over the course of just one month, but perhaps the labor market has shifted enough that, say, a weak positive in reality gets picked up as a modest negative in Homebase & Kronos. The signs might switch. /7
A bit more worrying is seasonal composition: not necessarily seasonality itself (I adjusted for typical seasonality) but the possibility that this small business data is missing, say, holiday hiring. /8
However, some other data sources that explicitly try to correct for overly-narrow composition, such as Opportunity Insights (left) and the @uscensusbureau Household Pulse Survey (right) are also showing job loss in November. /9
For more on these issues, check out these two threads of mine from last week. /10
As a reminder, my base models, which use Homebase, Kronos/UKG, & UI claims data, are pointing to a -515K to -228K seasonally-adjusted decline in nonfarm payrolls for November tomorrow (-198K to +93K non-seasonally-adjusted).
Homebase, in a report published this week, showed how their index performed last year. As you can see, there were declines between October and November last year as well.
Now let's pause here and notice too that there have been *several* months now where Homebase data outperformed in 2020 month-to-month versus 2019. And yet the base models have performed well. /3
The latest UI claims, Homebase, & Kronos numbers are consistent with payrolls coming in at -67K not-seasonally-adjusted for November, and -386K seasonally-adjusted.
There was a "pop" in the latest week of the Kronos data, but 1) it was the week after the reference week, and 2) because Kronos allows its sample to change over time, it may reflect new customers rather than employment changes at existing ones.
The St. Louis Fed uses Kronos microdata to calculate a "chained" version that keeps sample composition constant, but they don't have the latest week yet. Will be interesting to see if that rise is robust.
🚨🚨🚨
A slew of recent data is consistent with slow or even negative jobs growth in November. A quick thread.
November is typically a month when we expect raw, non-seasonally-adjusted employment data to *strengthen* (due, among other things, to hiring up for the holidays).
So when the unadjusted data is weakening or shrinking in November, that's an especially bad sign.
Data from Homebase, a private scheduling firm, suggest shrinking employment b/t mid-Oct and mid-Nov. Kronos, a different firm, shows slightly positive but weak growth.
Both, in tandem w/ UI claims, are consistent with -143K jobs in Nov not-seasonally-adjusted, or -461K adjusted.
Initial claims rise modestly week over week, were ~1.1 million last week.
The recent declines in regular UI recipients, properly including the extended PEUC and EB programs, may be slowing.
And to punctuate that point: ~230,000 workers looked like they left regular state UI at the end of October, but actually just exhausted their regular benefits and transferred to the federal extended PEUC program.
On the one hand, the US recovery so far has been durably positive & modest
On the other hand, b/t the COVID surge, the cold winter weather, exhausted household savings, the end of moratoria on student loans/foreclosures/evictions, & UI expirations, we're piling on a lot of risks
And add on the risks of business closures & state/local cuts. There's a lot that can hurt us economically between now and wide vaccine distribution.
The wrong question to ask is whether the recovery is "self-sustaining" without further fiscal support. I am less confident in this assessment now, but it's still quite possible that if we got no fiscal package most economic data would continue coming in north of zero.
The good news is that the rate in which employed workers are going directly into *permanent* layoff has fallen, though is still elevated [left].
The bad news is that the rate at which already-nonemployed workers are *becoming* permanent layoffs is high and rising [right].
Meanwhile, hourly wage growth among workers keeping their jobs is stable [L], but weekly wage growth has fallen [R], a sign that employed workers are getting fewer hours.