1/ There are 58 immigration courts in the United States.

In the past seven days, one out of every five of them--including my own here in Boston--has been exposed to #covid19.

We can't keep doing this. Please stop making us do this.
2/ Accidentally posted Chicago twice up there, but there were a total of 11 of these #immigrationcourt exposures this week alone--just as the second wave is cresting.
3/ I haven't physically appeared in #immigrationcourt for weeks, & only then bc I felt it necessary for effective representation in a tough case.

My partner has serious pre-existing lung issues. Many asylum cases are life-and-death.

This is not a choice I should have to make
4/ @JMolinaFlynnEsq is an outstanding lawyer who had to make the same choice and is now paying for it with a particularly bad case of #covid19 he earned by doing nothing more than showing up for his client. I hope @DOJ_EOIR has seen and really read this.

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1335566…
5/ It gets worse. Boston's #immigrationcourt has jurisdiction over residents of two states with high #covid19 rates (MA/RI) and others with some of the lowest #s (VT/NH/ME). Ppl who would never come in contact w/each other made to share air on threat of deportation if they don't
6/ Maybe even worse? @USCIS is going full speed with in-person interviews, & no apparent intention to even slow down--let alone shut down, even if MA does. Ppl are told not to come if they have symptoms, as if that's enough, but they have overwhelming incentive to attend anyway.
7/ From prolonged, indefinite detentions to absurdly arbitrary visa denials to Constitution-free deportation orders, the US immigration system is steeped in a culture of administrative violence for which no one person is responsible. It was already killing people every day.
8/ We often talk about "rolling the dice" on tough cases. Now it's more like Russian roulette.

These courts & field offices must be closed, & I'm saying this just as much for the ppl who work there & their families as for me and mine.

It's not worth it. Nothing is.
CORRECTION: one in five *that we know of.* The actual number has to be much closer to 58
9/ so this is just going to happen every day now

#immigrationcourt

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Matt Cameron

Matt Cameron Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @matt_cam

3 Dec
TODAY IN "WHAT PART OF 'LEGAL IMMIGRATION' DON'T YOU UNDERSTAND?"

More than 1 million ppl in the US with #TPS are now in a status so unclear that I have to provide lengthy letters simply to explain that it doesn't actually expire next month. USCIS is letting confusion reign here
And here in its entirety is everything that USCIS has provided to the public to "explain" the current status of #TPS for El Salvador, Haiti, and certain other countries. This is literally all that's keeping them from losing jobs, licenses, unemployment, etc during a pandemic.
Imagine walking into HR, the DMV, or the unemployment office with a card which expires next month & the page below to try to explain that you are actually in lawful immigration status well past Jan. You'd be very fortunate to find anyone who'd read past the first few sentences
Read 6 tweets
2 Dec
this is the future "conservatives" want
The army of broken Trump toys is pushing this fashy nonsense pretty hard rn, but the rest of them are more than happy to let this all play out and see where it goes
"if"
Read 14 tweets
2 Dec
Classic USCIS logic:

1) Govt fails to notify client of deportation order
2) Client learns of order 20 yrs later
3) Client discloses order in residency app & sworn statements confirming no prior knowledge
4) USCIS denies residency for "lying" re: deportation order she disclosed
this is an extremely abbreviated procedural history of a somewhat tortured case, but I promise you that really is the whole thing
there was no point at which she was aware of the order in which she even had an *opportunity* to lie and it would have made absolutely no sense to do that anyway. As I always tell my clients, any govt which can find a guy in Yemen w/a drone can figure out your immigration history
Read 7 tweets
27 Nov
watching competent adults confront the untrammeled lunacy of Trumpworld is almost as good as the Thanksgiving leftovers I'm enjoying while reading today's 3rd Circuit smackdown
"godspeed & good luck with that cert petition, kids"
tens of millions of Americans may spend the rest of their lives believing that Trump was cheated out of a second term simply bc Trump's legal team has been publicly saying that everywhere--well, everywhere but in any actual court, anyway
Read 6 tweets
18 Nov
I chose an extremely unprofitable field of law in which I knew that I might not be able to fully repay my student loans for decades (if at all). I now drive a $900 car, got lucky on a great mortgage, buy 1 pair of shoes/yr... and am still only paying down interest on my loans.
AFAIK I don't have many lawyers who make more than $100K in my immediate circles, & frankly those who do typically aren't working with the ppl who most need counsel. Canceling a chunk of our debt would be one of the best things this country could do for free/low-cost legal aid
all I'm really trying to say here is that I am happy to provide @michaelbd with fifteen years of my student loan statements on the entirely reasonable condition that he agrees to shove every one of them all the way up his ass

Read 4 tweets
9 Nov
Niz-Chavez in #SCOTUS today:

SOTOMAYOR: may I interest you in another copy of the opinion I already wrote on this 2 yrs ago
GORSUCH: what she said
KAGAN: can I maybe draw you a diagram, or
BREYER: how about following the law as written, have you tried that

KAVANAUGH: ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Kavanugh's position in non-legal terms:

It's totally fine for a restaurant to give you 1/2 your bill at the table and send the other 1/2 along to your last known address at some point in the indeterminate future while also taking you to small claims court for the whole amount
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!