I've participated in some great discussions on #COVID19 and #vaccines on #Clubhouse recently. I’ll use this thread to share some references I’ve mentioned and/or plan to bring up in future rooms. @joinClubhouse 1/
First up is a new tool from @bhrenton that tracks #CovidVaccine allocations to US states, and *some* distribution sites, based on publicly-available sources and pending a federal tracking website. 2/
Next up is a link to the Black Coalition Against Covid (@BCAgainstCOVID), which I learned about when I was on a panel with its cofounder @DrReedTuckson. It has a number of good resources including a great town hall on COVID-19 vaccine development. 3/
Here’s a tool many people found helpful around the Thanksgiving holiday, which is even more relevant in December: what’s my risk of being exposed to COVID during a holiday gathering? 4/
And here's a great resource on COVID safety in schools from @HarvardChanSPH. Lots of useful guidance & tools, from how to create a pandemic resilient teaching environment to calculators for portable air cleaners. 5/
Here's the @nytimes tool I mentioned in today's #Clubhouse discussion. It helps *estimate* where you are in the priority list for a vaccine based on where you live and your risk factors. 6/
We also discussed dexamethasone, which was shown to benefit persons with #COVID19 requiring oxygen or intubation. The @NEJM article is here and Nature coverage below. nejm.org/doi/full/10.10… 7/
Carter came across James Reason's work in human failures and complex systems when he worked on patient safety at the Dept of Veterans Affairs.
Swiss cheese was a good way to explain the power of early coordinated NPIs in a pandemic, which was called "community mitigation." 2/
Community mitigation came out of @DrRHatchett's work to understand the impact of combined NPIs. In 2006 Richard commissioned NIH-funded MIDAS modelers (3 groups) to model NPIs at different points in time. 3/
It is not a simple undertaking to establish a human challenge model, particularly with a novel virus for which the pathophysiology is not well-understood and where a targeted therapeutic is not available for what could be a lethal disease. 2/
Safety is obviously a major issue to be worked out, and this is tightly linked to ethical considerations. Beyond this, it takes time to determine the baseline infection/disease parameters that you hope to modify with the vaccine. 3/ thelancet.com/journals/lanin…
@bnallamo Fair question. Here are a few thoughts from a non-regulator. First, @US_FDA, led by Peter Marks and Operations Warp Speed, led by Moncef Slaoui, recognize that every day matters for HCWs and high-risk groups and are moving with extraordinary speed. 1/
@bnallamo@US_FDA An EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) for a vaccine is not the same as a therapeutic, given that the vaccine is being given to subgroups of people who are “healthy” and may or may not be exposed to the virus. The bar for safety & efficacy data is therefore higher than for Rx. 2/
@bnallamo@US_FDA The dataset is very large (44K participants), and thorough analyses of safety & efficacy take time. Moreover, the studies aren’t powered to conclude efficacy in the subgroups being considered for EUA, yet convincing benefit-risk assessments for those groups need to be shown. 3/
THREAD
In light of the Pfizer #vaccine news, a natural question is whether it's feasible to develop “better” #COVID19 vaccines after the first ones are approved?
The answer is yes. It can be complicated but there are ways to do it. 1/
First let’s break this down into three questions:
▪️ Why might we want better vaccines?
▪️ Why would it be hard to study new vaccines?
▪️ What are the options for doing this? 2/
WHY MIGHT WE WANT BETTER VACCINES?
After we’ve seen full Phase 3 datasets on the first vaccines, we may desire better efficacy in certain populations, longer protection, greater impact on transmission, improved dosing schedule, or an improved safety profile. 3/
First, it shows vaccines *can* prevent COVID illness in humans, and it validates the spike protein target. We didn't know these things before today, and it's good news for all #COVID19 vaccines in development. 1/
Second, the early efficacy is quite high, although it may wane over time. We can't say anything about duration of protection yet, but it helps to start from a high level of efficacy. Higher efficacy reduces the uptake needed to significantly dampen virus transmission. 2/
To be clear, it's not impossible, and OWS surely has assumptions to support this. And yes we must be ambitious.
But many will assume and/or communicate that these *targets* are what they can *expect* to happen, when there are many unknowns and execution risks. 1/
A few big ones: (1) we don't have *any* efficacy data, incl in elderly; (2) manufacturing scale-up is complex and delays very common; (3) first-time cold-chain, distribution and logistics; and (4) presumably more than one vaccine needs to succeed for this to happen; etc. 2/