शुंग वंश के पतन के पूर्व (~75 BCE के पूर्व), #संस्कृतम् क्या कभी भी बोलचाल की भाषा रही थी ? अवश्य रही थी ।

संस्कृत विद्वान और पद्मश्री कपिलदेव द्विवेदी के विचार, प्राचीन प्रमाणों के साथ, इस सूत्र में रख रहा हूँ ।

पढिए, जानिए और अग्रेषित करें । 🙏

1/9
2/9

@ निरुक्तकार यास्क (~700 BCE)

• संस्कृत को "भाषा" कहा है और वैदिक संस्कृत से पृथक् माना है (न इति प्रतिषेधार्थीयो भाषायम् - निरुक्त 1.2)

• संस्कृत के प्राच्य और उदीच्य भेदों का उल्लेख + लौकिक संस्कृत से वैदिक शब्दों की निष्पत्ति (भाषिकेभ्यो धातुभ्यो ... निरुक्त 2.2)
3/9

@ पाणिनि (~500 BCE)

• वैदिक संस्कृत को छन्द और लोकबोली के लिए भाषा शब्द का प्रयोग और दोनों के बीच का अंतर भी स्पष्ट किया ।

• पूर्वी भाषा के लिए प्राचाम् , उत्तरी के लिए उदीचाम् आदि का प्रयोग ।
4/9

@ कात्यायन (~350 BCE)

• वार्तिकों में स्पष्टता - लोकशब्दों के आधार पर ही संस्कृत व्याकरण की रचना (लोकतोर्थप्रयुक्ते शब्दप्रयोगे शास्त्रेण धर्मनियमः - महा. आह्निक 1)

• सर्वे देशान्तरे (महा. आ. 1) - विभिन्न प्रांत/प्रदेश/देश में प्रयुक्त भाषा से धातुओं/शब्दों का संकलन ।
5/9

@ पतंजलि (~100 BCE)

• पाणिनि और कात्यायन के उक्त कथनों की पुष्टि उदाहरणों के साथ बताई ।

• सिद्धे शब्दार्थसम्बन्धे - व्याकरण चलता है प्रचलित शब्द और अर्थ के आधार पर ।

• प्रियतद्धिता दाक्षिणात्याः - दक्षिण के विद्वान तद्धितरूपों में अधिक रुचि रखते हैं ।
6/9

• सर्वे देशान्तरे (सूत्र के चौथे ट्वीट को देखो) और अन्य सूत्रों की व्याख्या में कम्बोज, सौराष्ट्र, मध्यदेश आदि प्रदेशों में प्रयुक्त संस्कृत का उल्लेख ।

• एकैकस्य शब्दस्य बहवोऽपभ्रंशाः - संस्कृत के शुद्ध रूपों का अपभ्रंश में रूपांतरण का उल्लेख ।
7/9

• वैयाकरणी (व्याकरण के रचयिता) से अधिक ज्ञान सूत (सारथी) को होने का उल्लेख ।

• सूत शब्द की व्युत्पत्ति सु+उत (अच्छा बुना) न हो कर सुवतेरेव सूतः (√षू प्रेरणे धातु से सूत अर्थात् हाँकनेवाला) ऐसा ज्ञान एक सूत द्वारा मिलने का उल्लेख (महा. 2.4.56)
8/9

इन सभी से पूर्व, #रामायणम् में हनुमानजी द्वारा सीताजी के साथ अशोक वाटिका में हुआ वार्तालाप संस्कृत में ही था ।

वाचं चोदाहरिष्यामि मानुषीमिह संस्कृताम् । (सुन्दरकाण्ड 30.17)
9/9

इल्वल राक्षस ने ब्राह्मण का रूप लेकर संस्कृत में ही ब्राह्मणों को निमंत्रित किया ऐसा उल्लेख भी #रामायणम् से प्राप्त होता है ।

अतः रामायण काल से ही बोलचाल की भाषा, आर्य और अन्य प्रदेशों में भी, संस्कृत रही थी उसमें कोई सन्देह नहीं है ।

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with व्यासोन्मुखः

व्यासोन्मुखः Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Vyasonmukh

18 Nov
Can I use the same argument of @D_Roopa_IPS (Firecrackers are not old enough practice/absent in "ancient" texts to count it as Hindu) for वाचस्पत्यम् कोश ?

वाचस्पत्यम् referred by Nityanand in his tweet is a work of 19th century. It is in "modern" category.
If you @D_Roopa_IPS ji insisting to have proof from ancient sources about firecrackers then you can't take support from modern sources.

Moreover, if one random tweet from someone is good enough for you to endorse yr claim, then it shows yr bias, nothing else.
Also @D_Roopa_IPS ji,

• Is Dr. Swamy an ancient person ?
• What is his credential to even speak on this topic ?
• How is he a leader ? Which govt. portfolio is he handling ?

Again it shows yr selective bias to prove yr point.
Read 7 tweets
6 Oct
कौटिल्य के #अर्थशास्त्रम् में वर्णित शत्रुवध (Destruction of Enemy) के विभिन्न प्रयोग (Concerning Secret Practices).

• Target Person - अधर्मिष्ठ (Unrighteous).
• Aim (हेतु) - चातुर्वर्ण्यरक्षा (Protection of 4 वर्ण).

1/n
2/n

घातक विष को विश्वसनीय म्लेच्छों के द्वारा शत्रु के वस्त्रों में लगवाना ।

Deadly poison to be introduced on articles/clothes by trusted म्लेच्छ people.

Note the use of म्लेच्छ people in such an atrocious but important task.
3/n

चितकबरा मेंढक, जंगली तीतर, कानखजुरा, छिपकली आदि के चूर्ण का धुआँ तत्काल ही प्राणघातक होता है ।

Smoke of the powder of speckled frog, centipede, lizard etc. can instantly kill the person.
Read 9 tweets
23 Jun
What an agenda driven portal @Wikipedia is !

In this thread, you will see an example how they are trying to paddle fake agenda by citing "laughable/substandard references" in the field of #History

• Wiki Page - Battle of Haldighati
• Fake Agenda/Claim - Mughal Victory

1/6
2/6

To substantiate the claim "Mughal Victory", two references are cited

• 1st ref. - The Mughal Empire at War (pic 1)
• Writer - Andrew De La Garza (pic 2)

This book released in 2016 only and has only 4 lines for this battle p56 (pic 3)

Issues with this citation are ...
3/6

Issues in 1st citation -

• Cited reference is absolutely insufficient as it doesn't contain any primary material to support claim of Mughal victory

• Writer has no credential on his name to get cited on subject like "Battle of Haldighati".

Now coming to 2nd reference
Read 6 tweets
9 Jun
This is a case of false interpretation of सूत्र literature like #अर्थशास्त्रम् and trying to misquote कौटिल्य

This happen when u don't know #संस्कृतम्

Here, I will put facts from the same chapter दासकर्मकरकल्पम् (3.13)

दास is not slave. How ? Read in this thread

1/6
2/6
The very first सूत्र in this chapter says :
उदरदासवर्जमार्यप्राणमप्राप्तव्यवहारं ...

Except उदरदास (The one who is दास out of his compulsion), nobody from 4 वर्ण can be made दास

Violation of this rule attracts various levels of दण्ड ... Highest is प्राणदण्ड.
3/6
Above rule is made crystal clear in next सूत्र - न तु एव आर्यस्य दासभावः

As a general rule, nobody from आर्य (ब्राह्मण/क्षत्रिय/वैश्य/शूद्र) can be made दास

कौटिल्य further states
म्लेच्छानाम् अदोषः प्रजां विक्रेतुम् आधातुं वा (but मलेच्छ, who is out of आर्य fold, does it)
Read 6 tweets
30 May
Starting a thread on #कामसूत्रम् (1/n)

I will dismantle vile propaganda to denounce this wonderful text as a sex manual

Before I start, read this article by me to understand कामसूत्र as a शास्त्र
indiafacts.org/kamashastram-o…

Hindi version - indiafacts.org/kamashastram-o…
2/n
Lack of basic information leads to false propaganda (see the tweet in the image)

कामसूत्र is not written by Richard Burton. Authorship is with वात्स्यायन (~300 BCE) - a well known fact

Person who doesn't know such basic info has made a video to denounce this text !!
3/n
In fact, title of Burton's translation work in 1883 was - Kamasutra of Vatsyayana

Burton himself has acknowledged that this is not his work but is of वात्स्यायन and Burton has just translated it

So, saying "Burton written Kamasutra" is an agenda driven white lie.
Read 16 tweets
1 May
Thread (1/3)
Image of स्वस्तिक on a #Petroglyph in #India (At ~3900 mtr altitude)

Petroglyph = Carving on rock/rock piece #RockArt

• Place = Manda village, Zanskar Valley (#Ladakh)
• Dating = 50 BCE (~2000 yrs ago)

Pic 1 – Zanskar Valley on Map
Pic 2 – Found Petroglyph
2/3
~0.6 mtr stone piece has a carving of स्वस्तिक using a sharp stone tool. Such an art is first time discovered in this region and probably in #India too.

Pic 3 – स्वस्तिक image highlighted
Pic 4 – Traditional स्वस्तिक (Understanding Purpose)
3/3
From a nearby sanctuary, स्वस्तिक variant carved on a stone plate (See the image) is also found (~50 BCE)

It is not a petroglyph but an important connecting link of Swastika with #Ladakh region from the same era as of the petroglyph depicted in the above tweet
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!