EU toolbox update: New regulation "designed to protect EU funds from being misused by EU governments who bend the #ruleoflaw" approved by EP after being approved by Council on 14 Dec
To get my head around on how new mechanism will work I have put together yet another slide 😎⬇️
Step-by-step overview of new general (#ruleoflaw) conditionality mechanism for protection of #EUbudget
(any mistake PLMK)
(warning: rudimentary design of slide not pre-approved by @JoelleGrogan aka @stickytrickylaw but hope to convince her/"them" to help out with version 2.0)
More helpful feedback received re Step 4 (who said academics should stay away from Twitter 😎)
Version 3.0 below
Version 4.0 below
(sorry 😬 you can blame @PatrykWachowiec for the helpful feedback he provided me with and which left me with no choice but to make some further slight revisions to first 3 steps)
Speaking of unlawful puppet body known as Poland's "Disciplinary Chamber" & its unlawful "decision" to void ECJ AK ruling, this development was mentioned for 1st time at ECJ level by AG Tanchev in his Opinion of 17 Dec 2020 in C-824/18
@RULEOFLAWpl This is an important AG opinion which also for the 1st time mentions *and* makes use of Poland's Supreme Court resolution of 23 January 2020 which held the bogus "DC" not to constitute a court
On this resolution see my @reconnectEU post and paper
@RULEOFLAWpl@reconnectEU Another "1st" at ECJ level: reference to lack of effective constitutional review in Poland but AG is still too diplomatic here as EU Comm, EU Parliament & CoE Parliament have been explicit about total lack of effective review + unlawful composition of CT
Based on my first quick reading of draft EUCO conclusions re #ruleoflaw conditionality mechanism, have to agree with @alemannoEU but let me add some quick comments in thread below
(Health warning: have spent about 7 hours on zoom today so my brain no longer fully operational)
Para 1 of draft conclusions: 2nd sentence is legally wrong/poorly drafted. Art 7 not only procedure to address "breaches" of Art 2 TEU values as already established by ECJ re Polish Sup Court purge (both item under Art 7 and subject of successful infringement action in 6198/18)
Paragraph 2 gives a veneer of credibility to recurrent nonsense from autocrats that destroying national checks and balances is somewhat something which can be justified in the name of their alleged “constitutional identity”. Very poor but not end of world
This is a great post by @ADimitrovs on new but not adopted yet #RuleofLaw conditionality mechanism & EU budget. Have just finished myself reading the 20,372 words of trilogue "4-column" doc re this latest likely addition to EU's toolbox. My first reaction assessment in 🧵 below
Title of not yet adopted Regulation (at @EUCouncil's insistence) no longer mentions #ruleoflaw & concept of "generalised deficiencies" with reference instead to "a general regime of conditionality". Cosmetic rebranding to assuage autocrats or bad omen? Let’s continue to find out
Article 1 (subject matter): surprise! the rule of law is back BUT “breaches” have replaced “generalised deficiencies” (again at Council’s insistence) = deliberate attempt to force Commission to not see the wood for the trees…
When will the @EU_Commission learn that time is autocrat's best friend & that more reporting will do nothing to prevent creation of irreversible facts on the grounds...
@ceu@EU_Commission But Comm is not only institution which deserves criticism
+3 years to issue ruling on this crucial pressing issue is not serious
#RuleofLaw breakdown in #Poland: Just finished reading this meticulous, compelling and unprecedented ruling by the Amsterdam District Court whose potential ramifications for the functioning of EU legal order could be extremely significant. Thread ⬇️
1/ Historical significance: 1st time in legal history of EU (TBOMK) that a national court of EUMS has found judicial system of another EUMS as a whole to have been structurally disabled = judicial independence structurally gone in Poland = we have black hole in EU’s Area of FSJ
2/ 🇳🇱 Court’s (correct) diagnosis: no independent/effective Const Tribunal left; ENCJ-suspended NCJ not impartial/independent; Disciplinary Ch not a court; independence of SC & ordinary courts no longer guaranteed with disciplinary proceedings possible for applying ECJ case law
2/ Different takes you can read, including from most eminent experts, suggest ambiguous EUCO conclusions and this is indeed the case but contrary to noise originating from kleptocrats/autocrats in Budapest/Warsaw, EUCO conclusions contain several positive #ruleoflaw aspects
3/ respect for the rule of law is explicitly mentioned twice with same para appearing in main text in MFF section (para A24) and in horizontal section of Annex (para 22) and there are 2 additional mentions to Article 2 TEU values, which include of course the rule of law