📍Huge blow—UK had halted plans to open rapid-turnaround #COVID19 tests across England amid concerns about the accuracy. Huge blow to UK’s £100bn “Operation Moonshot” mass-testing plan, to increase daily tests from 430k to 10mil. Poor 🇬🇧 case surging too. theguardian.com/world/2020/dec…
2) Experts in testing and understand immunology like @michaelmina_lab think the test is good in capturing **INFECTIOUS** virus, which is key.
5) there are MORE ACCURATE RAPID ANTIGEN tests like the Abbott PanBio test available in continental Europe. It’s cheap and relatively very accurate. See thread 🧵 below 👇
6) comparing nasal PanBio rapid antigen test vs Nasal PCR #COVID19 test:
➡️VERY good.
📌Sensitivity 98.1% (99.0% for samples with higher viral load PCR Ct<=33)
📌Specificity 99.8% (ie 0.2% false positive)
(Sensitivity is 91-94% vs deep nasopharyngeal PCR).
7) Thus, @michaelmina_lab thinks the lateral flow rapid antigen test is still indeed good for population screening.
Here is how they work.
8) For this reason, just yesterday, UK regulators also just gave the go-ahead for lateral flow devices (LFDs), which give results in 30 minutes, to be used at home by members of the public, with a few minor caveats. dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9…
9) Notably, you can only use them to confirm you need to isolate - NOT to make decisions on whether to mix with family and friends. It should not be a passport to go party since it just focuses on active infectious status.
10) We really need rapid tests. Look how fast the epidemic is spreading in the UK recently. And especially among young people. But honestly all age groups.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2) Potential scenario is infection through drainage system. U-traps typically act as water seals in each bathroom. But they can dry out if unused allowing aerosols from one unit to travel to another.
3) Thus is an amazingly detailed epidemiological study. They ruled out all other forms of transmission because the infected families had no other contact in their high rise. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
USA 🇺🇸 ranks—#43 in % 🧬 sequenced. So #winning, not.🧵
2) “Given the small fraction of U.S. infections that have been sequenced, the variant could already be in the United States without having been detected,” the CDC wrote on its website.
3) Remember the old saying, “No testing, no pandemic”?
📌Same goes for virus mutations. “No sequencing, no new mutated variants”
➡️We can’t be ostrich in the sand about this. To stop pandemic, we have to stay ahead of it—know when it’s changing or becoming more contagious.
2) “When patients get really sick with Covid, they’re in the hospital for weeks,” said Dr. Arghavan Salles, a physician who has worked in I.C.U.s in New York and Arizona over the course of the pandemic.
3) “When patients get really sick with Covid, they’re in the hospital for weeks,” said Dr. @arghavan_salles, a physician who has worked in I.C.U.s in New York and Arizona over the course of the pandemic.
2) Outside Greater London, the variant has higher viral loads. Within Greater London, the new variant does not have significantly higher viral loads. But this could be due to demographics, such as a faster variant growth rate in particular age-groups.
3) So is it higher or not? Or is it some London / non-London effect? ➡️ it’s really higher.
➡️In a multivariable model (adjusting mutually), what won was the B.1.1.7 variant’s 501Y mutation as key—**higher viral load**
❌London/other region interaction effect not significant.