A tweetorial on optimal machine settings for B line image acquisition, with a focus on: focal position at pleura, harmonics off, and increased far gain.

Inspired/based on the recent article - onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
@cameron_baston @IsaacMatthiasM1

#POCUS #IMPOCUS

1/18
Let's start with some polls
We will stick to low frequency probes here (i.e. curvilinear and phased array - linear has its own purpose for detailed pleural assessment)

Which preset do you prefer for B line assessment?

2/
What depth do you typically set?

3/
After selecting preset and selecting depth, do you ever adjust any other machine settings to optimize B line assessment?

4/
Importantly, there is no right answer to the above questions!

We won't discuss much about preset or probe type. But we will discuss machine settings to optimize B line quality, based on
1) Theory based on physical basis of B lines
2) In vitro study
3) Study in patients

5/
To start with the theoretical basis:

B lines are
1) reverberation artifacts
2) formed from the pleural interface when the interstitium is thickened
3) span the full depth of the field

See explanation in tweetorial on ABCs of lung ultrasound here


6/
1) Artifact
Tissue harmonic imaging is a technology designed to minimize artifact. In theory, harmonics being "on" may reduce B line quantity. The same idea applies for cardiac presets, which tend to minimize artifact.
(Notably, there is conflicting literature here)

7/
2) Formed at the pleural interface
Thus it would make sense to put the focus at the pleural line. The focal position is the depth at which lateral resolution is highest, so interstitial thickening is more likely to be detected w pleural at focal position.

Here, focus at 10 cm
8/
Same site, but focus moved to pleura. Improved lateral resolution at the pleural line brings out more B lines.

9/
3) B lines Span the full depth of the field
Often the brightness of B lines fades deeper into the image due to loss of energy with subsequent reverberations. Increasing the far gain can theoretically improve ease of visualizing B lines in the far field (as shown here).

10/
Study using in-vitro B line model (tetrahedral air bubbles) found better quality w
-focus at pleura
-more far-gain
-lung preset (vs abd)

Did not acheive significance for "harmonics off"
Limitations: one machine (Sparq), needs further study in pts.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31089845/

11/
Back to the article that inspired the thread. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…

This study sought to test if adjusted settings (developed based on in-vitro experiments) were associated change in perceived quality (and quantity) of B lines.

12/
Adjusted settings were defined as focus at pleural line, harmonics off, and time gain compensation increased linearly in the far field.

In a retrospective study, most exams resembled the typical settings (and cardiac was most common preset).

13/
In the prospective study, reviewers (>100 prior lung ultrasound exams) were shown side by side clips of typical v adjusted settings (side randomized) and were asked to grade the quality and quantity of each.

Adj settings were reported to have better quality in ~97% of cases

14/
Conclusions
Though more data is needed, it seems reasonable that for B line assessment:
1) focus set at pleural line
2) harmonics off
3) increased fair gain

Limitations: these were studied as a bundle (not individual). Study not designed to compare probes or presets.

15/
Why does this matter?
1) Consistency is important, in both clinical practice and in research.
2) The utility of B lines lies in their high sensitivity for interstitial edema. If settings are suboptimum and limit sensitivity, that reduces the power of the B line assessment.

16/
Other points on B line acquisition
-remember to find the most perpendicular angle to the pleural line. Otherwise you may end up with a non-A non-B pattern, which is non-diagnostic.
-if ribs are obscuring view, can turn probe to remove ribs from view.

17/
After considering the above data and discussion, will you adjust machine settings for B line assessment?

18/
Thanks for reading, interested to hear all thoughts on experiences w B line assessment!

Tagging a few #POCUS friends @kyliebaker888 @iceman_ex @msenussiMD @cameron_baston @Manoj_Wickram @DRsonosRD @NephroP @ArgaizR @ria_dancel @hraza222 @ThinkingCC @Wilkinsonjonny @katiewiskar

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with IM POCUS Focus

IM POCUS Focus Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IMPOCUSFocus

22 Nov
1/
Thread: Ultrasound for CVC placement - more than just follow the needle tip and confirm the wire.

There are many potential uses of ultrasound during CVC placement, shown here. Not all are essential.

#POCUS #IMPOCUS #FOAMED #FOAMUS Image
2/
Pre-procedure
Lung sliding on ipsilateral side - for a comparison to post-procedure
-use linear probe
-apical and lateral/anterior
3/
Check vessel
-confirm compressibility
-understand axis of vessel
-check prox and distal for stenoses
-optimize depth and gain (this image may be undergained)
Read 25 tweets
15 Nov
Let's talk about placement of small bore nasoenteric feeding tubes and use of ultrasound for this (A thread)

Scenario: Pt with gastroparesis and COVID/ARDS, planning to prone, want post-pyloric tube. No dedicated team for this. Can we place safely w #POCUS guidance?

1/
How is small bore feeding tube (SBFT) different from standard NG?

Narrower (6-8 Fr vs 14-18 Fr), more flexible (but w rigid stylet for placement), longer. Thus: more comfortable, gastric or post-pyloric, ineffective for suction, prone to clogging, prone to PTX if placed in lung.
Some methods used for placement
1) Blind placement - NOT RECOMMENDED. 1-2% risk of PTX
2) 2 radiograph method (safe but time consuming)
3) Capnometry
4) Endoscopic visualization
5) Electromagnetic
6) Fluoroscopic
7) Ultrasound?

Nice article on this: med.virginia.edu/ginutrition/wp…

3/
Read 31 tweets
9 Mar
1/
Happy Monday everyone! We have a special case for you today written by UPMC PGY2 #POCUS enthusiast @MikeTao15.

A 52 yo M with hx of EtOH/HCV cirrhosis, VTE on Eliquis, HFrEF presents w worsening abd distention and pain. He is disoriented and unable to give much history.
2/
Cirrhosis previously complicated by esophageal varices, hepatic encephalopathy, and ascites. No follow up since last hospital admission at outside facility ~1 year ago. Has not been taking meds.

Vitals in the ED: Temp 38.1, HR 90, BP 98/70, Pulse Ox 96% on 2L
3/
He is lethargic, arousable to voice and oriented to self only
+scleral icterus
Cardiac + pulmonary exams normal
Abdomen distended, diffusely tender, no rebound/guarding
2+ b/l edema to thighs
Jaundiced, scattered ecchymoses
+asterixis
Read 36 tweets
28 Feb
Ever found DVT POCUS challenging? We do.

Here is a #Tweetorial on #POCUS for Lower Extremity DVT assessment. Let’s walk through a case and discuss common questions that arise.

50s f no PMH presenting to the ED on a Friday evening with right leg swelling and redness...

1/
History/exam/labs:

No travel, surgeries, immobilization. No dyspnea, CP. No meds. No FH of VTE. no tobacco.

HR 88 SpO2 98% RA BP 160/90 T 37.

Exam unremarkable other than 2+ LE edema erythema and tenderness from right ankle to knee.

CBC/BMP/coags normal

2/
Wells-DVT score 1 (for pitting edema confined to symptomatic leg), with a moderate pre-test probability for DVT.

It is Saturday. Formal vascular study (FVS) is not available until Monday. D-dimer is considered. Would you check D-dimer in this case? (poll)

3/
Read 39 tweets
11 Jan
1/
After a break for the new year, we are back with a case of #POCUS and abdominal distension.

59 y/o m with no medical history presenting with increasing abdominal girth and now altered mental status.

#IMPOCUS
2/
HPI:
well until 3 months ago. Since then, progressive fatigue, nausea, mild diffuse itching without rash. Few weeks of early satiety, poor PO intake, and now increasing abdominal girth. Last BM 3 days ago. No vomiting. Weight unchanged over 3 months. No fevers/chills.
3/
No home meds. 2-3 etoh drinks per day (none for a few wks). Unable to work due to symptoms. Past 1-2 days he has become confused and unable to ambulate.
Read 30 tweets
27 Sep 19
A lines, B lines, Consolidation… the ABCs of Lung Ultrasound

But what do they really mean?

Here we attempt a #tweetorial presenting a way of thinking about common patterns seen on lung ultrasound.

See table here for a summary, and thread below for details

#POCUS

1/
We will start with a hypothetical case for illustration
65 y/o f w HFpEF, COPD admitted 4 days ago with acute pancreatitis (now resolved). You are prepping her for discharge but she is now short of breath/hypoxic requiring 4 L O2.

2/
Reportedly coughed a lot after dinner yesterday. Has not gotten any inhalers or antiHTN meds this hosp stay.
Net positive 4L. HR 88 SpO2 90% 4L BP 165/90 RR 22 T 99.8. WBC 22 (from 12 a day ago).
JVP not seen RRR, +S1/S2, 2/6 SEM
Bibasilar crackles, No LE edema. BNP 150.

3/
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!