Collection of input to the discussion on:
➡️Two doses 3-4 weeks apart (per protocol)
vs
➡️Delay 2nd dose of up to 3 months

As with everything regarding this pandemic, there are no easy solutions, only difficult compromises.
1/x
@henrik_ullum @Heunicke @stinuslindgreen
Pfizer/BioBTech Protocol here

2nd dose is provided after 21 days & readout was 7 days after 2nd dose
pfe-pfizercom-d8-prod.s3.amazonaws.com/2020-09/C45910…
2/x
Moderna dosing & schedule

The Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine is administered intramuscularly as a series of two doses (0.5
mL each) 1 month apart

fda.gov/media/144637/d…
3/x
Astra-Zeneca/Oxford vaccine. The 2 doses are administrated 28 days apart
thelancet.com/journals/lance…

They do have subgroup data on 3 months dosing interval


UK delaying 2nd dose of AZ/Oxford vaccine

4/x
The discussion to potentially wait with the 2nd dose, is to increase the number of individuals, who are vaccinated with 1 dose, thus slowing the spread of the virus. Especially, in light of the concerning new data on mutated variant B.1.1.7/N501Y
5/x
"I am still a proponent of 2 dose vaccine but given the urgency, we can delay the 2nd dose until more vaccines become available. I know many others have been saying this all along, but it was the B.1.1.7 variant transmission rate that did it for me."
7/x
Below is a real risk highlighted, in regards to delaying 2nd dose.

8/x
"'Partial immunisation', caused by a delay of the second vaccine dose could accelerate the emergence of such 'vaccine-escape' mutants."
9/x
"These concerns might work out OK. But they might not. We simply *do not know*, and human immunology is very much capable of dealing us either high cards or low ones here. It’s a gamble. No other word for it."
10/x
Overall, there seems to be a high risk associated with changing the dosing regiment, as increasing the rate of escape mutations, potentially lose vaccine efficacy, would be a bad start to 21. On the other hand, fast vaccine rollout might be the best way to control the spread
11/x
I have tried to collect input on the subject for decision makers to have easy access to top-experts opinions on this difficult subject.
/end
Follow up #1
More caution on delaying the second dose, from someone with has on experience on developing viral escape mutations

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Martin Juhl

Martin Juhl Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MartinJuhl2

3 Jan
Hvad ville der være sket, eller hvad vil ske, hvis vi mister kontrollen med smitten i DK

Dette er baseret på følgende

➡️Hvor mange vil blive smittet
➡️Ekstrapolering fra nuværende tal
➡️Brug af aldersjusterede dødelighed
➡️Læringer fra udlandet

1/x
R0 værdien (hvor mange 1 smittet, smitter videre) for SARS-CoV-2, er estimeret til 2,5

Man skal minimum op på 60% samlet set, dette kan godt ske i flere bølger. Hænger sammen med årstid & restriktioner

thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/…

Flokimmunitet = 1 - 1/R0
For SARS-CoV-2 = 60%
2/x ImageImage
Den spanske syge, influenza pandemien i 1918-1919, kom i tre bølger.

Det menes i følge bogen "The Great Influenza", at den første bølge var en mildere form, og efter mutation og "passage" gennem flere personer, blev mere dødelig

3/x ImageImageImage
Read 19 tweets
1 Jan
Looked into COVID-19 Population Fatality Rate (PFR), which is how many individuals have died of the entire population.
At least 12 countries have now passed PFR = 0.1% and 5 countries are between 0.09-0.1%

For comparison, the the average PFR for seasonal influenza is ~0.01%
1/6 Image
The 12 countries with PFR >0.1% are:
Belgium 🇧🇪
Slovenia 🇸🇮
Bosnia 🇧🇦
Macedonia 🇲🇰
England 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿
Bulgaria 🇧🇬
Italy 🇮🇹
Peru 🇵🇪
Montenegro 🇲🇪
USA 🇺🇸
Czech Republic 🇨🇿
Spain🇪🇸
2/6 Image
These estimates are without taking excess deaths into consideration, which is how estimates for influenza deaths are derived
(Note: the red line in the first graph, is DK’s 2017/2018 influenza season, which seems to be a very large outlier, compared to all other countries)
3/6 Image
Read 6 tweets
29 Dec 20
Thorough comparison of SARS-CoV-2 and the seasonal influenza

Comparisons
➡️ CFR & IFR
➡️ Case-to-case
➡️ R0 & Herd theshold
➡️ Direct deaths to deaths
➡️ Relevant articles

1/x
Will use US and DK as examples

US had 12,000 - 61,000 deaths pr year (330 mill ppl)
And 9.3 - 45 mill estimated symptomatic infected

Both influenza deaths & symptomatic individuals are only estimates, based on statistical analysis, excess deaths, & sentinel monitoring
2/x
This paper states ~3-11% symptomatic flu cases pr year
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.111…

Below refs show that there are an additional 50-75% asymptomatic cases, thus indicating 6-44% flu cases (incl asymptomatic) in total pr year
3/x
wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/22…

ecdc.europa.eu/en/seasonal-in…
Read 23 tweets
27 Dec 20
Man kan nemt blive snydt af tal. Denne graf bliver delt på sociale medier, og bliver brugt som argumentation for ikke at vaccinere <65 årige.
Jeg har set lidt på det, og hvorfor det er helt forkert
@henrik_ullum @SSTbrostrom @Heunicke
1/x
Hvis man regner med at virus bliver endemisk over tid, og vil smitte de fleste på et eller andet tidspunkt, samt bruger O'Driscoll aldersjusterede dødeligheds-data (IFR) for Europa og USA, så vil det klart være at foretrække, at vaccinere de fleste, inklusiv yngre under 65 år
2/x
I Europa vil man regne med at >600.000 vil død under 65 år, hvis alle blev smittet på et tidspunkt.
Her vil man kunne redde mange liv, ved at vaccinere yngre personer, måske helt op til ½ million mennesker <65 år alene i Europa og USA.
3/x
Read 18 tweets
26 Dec 20
With a potentially more infectious variant lurking around

Rate of transmission of the variant (B.1.1.7), estimated to be 71% (95% CI 67% to 75%) higher than for other variants, and pontentially it may also have a higher viral load.
1/5
bmj.com/content/371/bm…
If the new variant in more infectious, that means R0-value will also be higher, which means a higher threshold for herd immunity, which means more than the original 60% of the population needs to be infected/vaccinated.
2/5
cell.com/immunity/fullt… Image
As R0 increases, the proportion of the population that must be immune to generate herd immunity increases
(1 – 1/R0).
R0=1.5➡️33%
R0=2➡️50%
R0=2.5➡️60%
R0=3➡️67%
R0=4➡️75%

Thus it is positive that 80% of the DK population is willing to be vaccinated
3/5
nyheder.tv2.dk/samfund/2020-1…
Read 5 tweets
27 Nov 20
3 argumenter for at holde smitten nede

➡️Bedre økonomi
➡️markant lavere overdødelighed
➡️Vacciner kommer snart

1/12

@Heunicke @SSI_dk @SSTbrostrom
Oversigt over rapporter, som peger på at lande med lav smitte har klaret sig bedre økonomisk
2/12
Graf som viser sammenhæng mellem overdødelighed og Covid-19 dødsfald.
Lande med lidt smitte har også haft lav overdødelighed, mens lande med megen smitte har haft stor overdødelighed.
Det indikerer at restriktioner dræber markant færre end Covid-19
3/12
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!