The total number of hospitalizations in 2020 "with" (not necessarily FOR) #COVID19 is within the range of annual hospitalizations FOR #influenza estimated by the CDC. (Thread continues...)
h/t Marjorie, a member of my reader community
The CDC estimates between 140,000 and 810,000 hospitalizations occur annually for flu (it's a range because numbers vary widely year to year). cdc.gov/flu/about/burd…
This December 30 @nytimes article states that "more than 670,000 Americans have been hospitalized with the disease this year".
I checked the source and confirmed that, according to data compiled by the COVID Tracking Project, there were 686,158 accumulated hospitalizations "with" COVID-19 in 2020. covidtracking.com/data/national
We should keep in mind that these numbers include both individuals who were admitted into the hospital for symptoms of COVID-19 and individuals who were there for whatever other reason, got tested, and received a positive result.
Comparing the 686,158 hospitalizations with COVID-19 for 2020 and the CDC's estimate of up to 810,000 hospitalizations annually for influenza, it appears that the disease burden was comparable to a bad flu season.
Indeed, as I've previously written, three years ago, during the 2017-2018 flu season, there were headlines in the news media across the country about hospitals being overwhelmed. It happens. jeremyrhammond.com/2020/12/22/rem…
To preempt the objection: I keep seeing criticisms from #lockdown advocates that opponents are "downplaying" #COVID19 severity. But to share a few pieces of data to put the situation into perspective in response to the incessant #fearmongering isn't to downplay anything.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The @nytimes presents the figure of 60% as the most conservative of estimates, going up to 90% (which, absurdly, would put #SARSCoV2 at the contagiousness level of measles) when in fact scientists have also estimated that the #HerdImmunity threshold could be far lower.
... the #COVID19#vaccines that have received emergency use authorization have been adequately studied such that we have scientific proof that they have no potential to cause harm.
But you are the one who is wrong and irresponsibly spreading dangerous misinformation.
As @RobertKennedyJr rightly notes, we do not have adequate data from the trials to be able to meaningfully claim that they are "safe". The data do not show that they prevent severe disease, hospitalization, death, or transmission. We have no data on long-term effects.
Here is how the #COVID19#lockdown regime in my home state of #Michigan is engaging in institutionalized scientific fraud, justifying authoritarian measures on the basis of nonsensical anti-science policies resulting in uninterpretable data. (1/9)
Here is the #Michigan Department of Health and Human Services (MDHHS) "COVID-19 Standard Operating Procedures" dated September 2020: (2/9) michigan.gov/documents/mdhh…
First, it shows plainly that state health officials are equating any positive PCR test with a "COVID-19" case, even though the detection of viral RNA by itself does not tell you whether the person is infectious or has (or has ever had) the disease caused by #SARSCoV2. (3/9)