Everyone is afraid of a #brexit shitstorm next week on the Short Strait...one thing not appreciated fully is that lorries are getting on the boats in Dover (so obtaining barcode via French SI Brexit systèm) and *still* getting pulled/stuck at Calais /1 on.ft.com/3ntFLJG
This is particularly true for those moving agri food products.
The haulier I spoke to yday moved a load of meat on Thurs lunchtime and was still stuck on Fri PM, despite his French customer going to Calais to see what problem was.
This haulier btw is one of best-prepared /2
The point, as @RHARodMcKenzie says is that when @michaelgove says hauliers must “be ready” and “have the right documents” it isn’t that simple.
As I says hauliers/exporters are falling foul of rules they don’t yet appreciate. /3
Here’s a list of five common problems from @RHARichardB and co - note one key issue is lack of agents, this will start to bite hard this week. /4
But the fact that its apparently possible to board ferries and still not be in possession of correct docs is telling - I seem to remember @RobHardyFR8 warning of this at a select cmme while back. He’s also flagged agents shortage. /5
Another issue I’ve heard about is EU changing rules on its TRACES-NT system for declaring agri products so that you can’t raise a CHED [Common Health Entry Document] from a U.K. address. That haulier I mentioned was having “CHED” issues - oh the joys! /6
In short, as @ColdChainShane said in that great thread - steep learning curve ahead. As my colleague @MureDickie reports in the above-linked @ft story, fear is that some companies doing hard stuff (fish/shellfish) won’t make it. ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's OUT! The first #Brexit Briefing of 2021...which explores how unrealistic some industry expectations are about 'fixes' to the current deal, now the penny is dropping about what it means for supply chains and UK position vis-a-vis EU 1/Thread
So take the example this week, where the @Foodanddrinkfed raised the issue that UK-hubs for food and drink were "unworkable" since goods that came in from the EU were attracting full tariffs when the were spun back into Ireland or other EU members /2
@Foodanddrinkfed They were backed by other EU associations - and both said they would lobby UK govt and @EU_Commission to 'fix' what they presumed was an "unintended consequence" of the deal....except that both EU officials and UK govt have basically shrugged. The deal is the deal. /3
🚨🚨🚨🇪🇺🇬🇧🚛🚒🇪🇺🇬🇧🚨🚨🚨 serious #brexit story alert - companies now starting to see penny drop on what rules of origin does to supply chains (food for example) but Brussels seems deaf to both EU & U.K. pleading. A bellwether? 😬 Stay with me. 1/ on.ft.com/2JOIlMP
So first the problem: its a tad complicated but basically goods that are imported into UK and then 'hubbed' onwards into Ireland or other parts of the EU are facing full EU tariffs - this is particularly bad for food stuffs, which attract high tariffs. Why is this? /2
It's a function of the Rules of Origin clauses that mean that goods have to sufficiently "originate" in the UK to qualify for zero-tariff entry to EU (and vice versa).
But to qualify, you have to do something to the goods - process them or add value - not just punt them on /3
🚨🚨🚚🚛🚨🚨email from Robert Hardy @RobHardyFR8 whose Customs Clearance Consortium is part of govt’s £200m scheme for GB-NI border warns of “huge shortage” of customs agents. Via @SJAMcBride /1
He adds: “Export from GB with import to Ireland [is] amongst the most complicated...We expect heavy volumes at Dover from tonight as GB exports start to ramp up and many transporters do not have transit and EU clearance in place.” ...remember @BrandonLewis ‘no border’ tweet 🙄/2
He then warns - as @RHARichardB had warned - that the issue is companies providing poorly cleansed/matched data...and announces CCC doesn’t have capacity to raise docs in mainland EU/3
Can we squash this tiresome trope that teachers don't want schools to open? Or that arguments for closing schools are somehow preserve of liberal/wet child-eating commies....this is about hard choices as the #COVID19 is running out of control (R above 1) /1
A decision to shut schools impacts different groups, whose interests all have to be weighted. Children. Teachers. Parents. The Economy. The NHS. Let's take each in turn. /2
First children. Simple one this. They are not (except in rare cases) impacted by the virus, but clearly they can pass it on to those who are impacted. They desperately need to be in school (I write as father of three teens in big Brighton state school) and suffer if they aren't/3
Remember the government wanting to "follow the science"? It is remarkable how far it is ignoring scientific advice on this new ultra-infectious variant of #Covid-19 by keeping schools open... both SAGE and @imperialcollege issuing warnings on school closures. Stay with me. /1
@imperialcollege First the @imperialcollege paper, which finds that the new variant is still being ultra-infectious despite November lockdowns - link here, but cases of new variant trebled in SEast, even under lockdown /2
@imperialcollege The paper then notes (given schools were open and under 20s are most infected): "A particular concern is whether it will be possible to maintain control over transmission while allowing schools to reopen in January 2021." /3
The real differences seems to turn on how easy it will be for either party to show “material impact” from a subsidy or regulatory change in order to apply tariffs. @alanbeattie says hard, citing similar clauses in US deals that have proved toothless /2
While Prof Chalmers argues the impact test is actually very weak - weaker than the distortion test required to justify intra-EU regulation - and will result in EU policing U.K. sovereignty from Brussels /3