1/I interviewed 18 sources for my 2019 debunking of Vivian, 15 of them ENGOs. I asked most of them if Vivian had followed up with them to verify information, especially how the Tar Sands Campaign funding they received was actually used.
2/ "Although in one email I found she asked [a] question about where the funding went, for the overwhelming majority, she would simply list a whole bunch of info she had collected, and then ask for us to reply and confirm it was correct."
3/Another quote:
"For the record, Tides Canada was never a member of the Tar Sands Campaign. In much of the Vivian Krause rhetoric, there is conflation between Tides Canada and Tides Foundation in the US. We believe this is intentional."
4/Another quote:
"Since 2005, approximately 1% of Tides Canada’s funding has gone towards pipeline and oil sands-related initiatives. This support went to Indigenous communities and environmental organizations as they address the impacts that such projects...
5/...would have on their communities and the environment, two things that are deeply connected. Tides Canada, along w/the scientific community and a rapidly growing population of Canadians, believe Canada must transition to a clean energy economy.
6/...We support activities that move us in that direction. Tides Canada receives funding from a wide range of partners including individuals, govts, foundations, charities, non-profits, and businesses. Our donors help us connect and empower a wide range of transformational...
7/...community-led initiatives that advance environmental, social, and economic justice. Like many other Canadian foundations and charities protecting the environment and building sustainable livelihoods, Tides Canada receives donations from Canadian and international donors –
8/...all of which are within the CRA guidelines. Between 2015-2018, Tides Canada received 43% of its total revenue from international contributions. Because important global issues like land, freshwater, oceans, and species conservation and climate change cross borders...
9/...international foundations often support work in other countries to further their mission. This is neither new nor surprising."
This is the charity Vivian, Jason Kenney, and industry leaders have been slandering for years.
They can't even get their facts straight.
10/To illustrate my point, my interview with Tides Canada CEO in which she confirms that neither Kenney nor the Allan inquiry contacted her org to confirm information before making wild public allegations.
Can you spot the pattern here?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2/Allow me a few "I told you so" moments that Premier @jkenney ignored:
"That squishing sound you hear? That’s Jason Kenney and the Alberta junior oil and gas sector being sucked under the Liberal climate plan steamroller."
The electrification of transportation is an existential threat to Alberta's oil industry but the energy war room @CDNEnergyCentre spends $30 million/year on vapid nonsense like this.
3/The next installment of our Sunday morning gibberish series from Milke.
I actually interviewed Norges, the Council on Ethics that advises Norges on this issue, and the Norwegian climate institute CICERO that prepared the report for the Council.
"...has been transforming itself in recent years to rely more on data/tech to improve its efficiency, such as using autonomous trucks...had anticipated these changes would lead to a smaller workforce." calgaryherald.com/business/local…
2/@jkenney's corporate tax reductions were supposed to create jobs. Instead, Suncor appears to have used the tax savings to invest in digital tech that will destroy jobs, about 4,500 of them.
All the big oil and gas producers are doing the same.
3/This slide from Suncor's July 22, 2020 investor presentations shows that the drive for more efficiency and lower operating costs that lead to a smaller workforce is a deliberate management strategy.
1. Climate risk is front and centre for international investors.
2. Oil sands bitumen has a very high ghg emissions-intensity.
3. Why doesn't Alberta use a federal "green recovery" to help fund lowering that emissions-intensity instead of acting like the sky is falling?
2/Suncor CEO Mark Little has already proposed federal funding for an independent public agency to invest in commercializing the manufacture of materials (like carbon fibre) from bitumen.
Why not use "green recovery" $$ to fund that agency?
Materials, not combustion, eh?
3/Electrification of industry - like oil and gas production - is a key strategy for combatting the climate crisis and lower ghg emissions.
Why not use "green recovery" funding to electrify oil sands production? Are wind and solar feasible? What about small modular nukes?