Senior Advocates Siddharth Luthra and R Besant, Amicus Curiaes, have submitted a draft rules on criminal practice.
Luthra: we had a colloquium.
Luthra: We have only recieved responses from Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, and Telangana High Court. 20 High Courts have chosen not to respond even after we held consultations.
CJI: we will give High Courts 2 weeks to submit or give suggestions to draft rules.
CJI: the high courts need to make a statement on adopting the draft rules for their high courts.
Luthra: These rules should be the substratum of all rules dealing with criminal trials. We also have to see what guidelines are to be followed to virtual hearing and trials dealing with such criminal trial hearing.
CJI indicates that Senior Advocate Siddharth Luthra will be appointed as the amicus curiae in the case where Delhi High Courts decision to conduct physical hearing has been challenged.
CJI orders: Rules have been drafted, and these rules are not followed in all High Courts. It is needed to prepare draft rules which can be incorporated into existing rules by the High Courts.
CJI: Accordingly we issued notice to regiatrar General of a high courts and chief secretary of all states so that uniform consensus can be there to amend the criminal rules and practice manual.
CJI: A committee of Senior Advocates Luthra, R Basant and K Parameshwar was formed to go through rules of all states and submit a report. The committee has submitted a report. This Court has received response of AP, Karnataka, Telangana and Delhi High Courts.
CJI: we consider it appropriate having regard to urgency of change, the high courts need to submit a substantive reply within two weeks dealing with all aspects. In case they cannot do so, the registrar general of the HC be remain present with appropriate instructions.
Adv Sneha Kalita for Gauhati HC: We have already filed an affidavit in 2016.
Luthra: This was a previous round. This report was submitted in March, 2020.
Kalita: we have not got this second report
CJI: the said report is available on the SC website. Access that and file the reply.
Amicus Curiae Advocate Vibha Datta Makhija submits a report on condonation of delay in consultation with SCLC.
CJI: we deem it appropriate to form a committee of experts to examine this issue and be perused by the High Courts.
CJI: We have also gone through report on timely filing of appeals. We therefore direct that various high courts to submit their responses to the committee through the registrar general. Committee shall submit report to us. Matter after 4 weeks.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Karnataka HC is hearing two petitions moved by Amazon and flipkart seeking to quash the probe ordered by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) against them for alleged violations of Competition Law.
Bench: Mr, Gopal Subramanium, your written submissions is bigger than the Writ petition. I only want bullet points.
Snr Advocate Gopal Subramanium appearing for Amazon: That can be kept aside for now, your lordships.
Subramanium: My villainy is on the basis of one document- one email. This email is me giving a rebate for a seller, it is on the referral fee and not the price.
Delhi High Court begins hearing appeal to its order staying the termination of Mohit Saraf from L&L partnership.
At the outset, Justice Sanjeev Narula discloses that he knows someone at L&L Partners. Counsel on both sides take no objection to his hearing the case
Court asking how much time counsel will take. Senior Advocate @DrAMSinghvi Abhishek Manu Singhvi, representing Luthra, says he will take 1 hour 30 mins. Senior Advocate Parag Tripathi, who will argue for Saraf, says he will take 45 mins.
#BombayHighCourt will continue hearing the plea filed by #bhimakoregaon accused Dr. Varavara Rao’s wife seeking court’s intervention in violation of his fundamental right to health by the State and jail authorities with the application for bail on medical grounds.
Justice SS Shinde: What heavens are going to fall if the petitioner is given protection for few days.
We have always believed that judiciary, agencies like RBI, CBI, ED should act independently.
Justice SS Shinde: There is threat to the very democracy if these agencies don't act independently.
Why should there be so much insistence on protection not being granted?
Bench presided by Justice Shinde were hearing the plea filed by NCP MLA Eknath Khadse for quashing a complaint filed by ED in connection to land case of Pune.
Supreme Court is scheduled to take up for hearing shortly, petition filed by @Facebook India chief Ajit Mohan challenging the summons issued to him by Delhi Assembly's Committee in relation to #DelhiRiots2020.
Senior Advocate Harish Salve appears for Petitioner: You can only summon those who is a party. If at all one is summoned is it limited to questions of evidence or fact. I may have strong opinions which I may not want to express
Senior Adv Salve: This is not a summon by the Parliament. The genesis of privilege is privilege against the crown. When the house of commons assemble they petition a ground. These are privileges by the crowm against the crown.