#SupremeCourt to shortly hear a plea by NDTV promoters, Prannoy Roy and Radhika Roy against Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) order of penalty of Rs. 27 crore for failing to disclose price sensitive information to the shareholders of NDTV @PrannoyRoyNDTV@SEBI_India
SEBI had held that the ICICI loan agreement and the two VCPL loan agreements contained clauses and conditions that substantially affected the functioning of NDTV. @ndtv #SupremeCourt
Additionally, it noted that the VPCL loan agreements also warranted transfer of shares of NDTV by the promoters which was carried out off-market by way of various inter se bulk transactions. @SEBI_India @ndtv
Bench to commence hearing.
Senior Adv Mukul Rohatgi appears for the NDTV promoters
Rohatgi: Petitioners are husband and wife. They are promoters of a channel. Show cause notice was issued 10 years after a transaction. It was issued in 2018 which us hopelessly barred by time. They owned 100 percent shares of NDTV , that was disinvested
CJI: How much security are you willing to give?
Rohatgi: I have no security or money, I cannot hand over shares without leave of Tribunal. We will argue the appeal its a matter of 10 days
CJI: tribunal may not hear you after 10 days if you don't give security. You give some security. Can you give some guarantee
Rohatgi: I can give guarantee of shares. We are struggling news channel we don't have any other resources
Adc Fereshte D Sethna: This morning shares was trading at 37.35 on NSE and 37.25 on BSE. We can provide 50 lakh shares. Total would be around 18 crores. Amount directed to be deposited is 27 crores
CJI: shri Rohatgi is willing to provide a statement of shares they are willing to provide as security in view of deposits ordered by the tribunal. Please give the value also. When can you file
#BombayHighCourt will begins hearing the plea of #BhimaKoregaon accused Dr. Varavara Rao for grant of bail on medical grounds along with his the plea seeking Court’s intervention against violation of his fundamental right to health.
Delhi High Court starts hearing @amazon's plea seeking enforcement of Emergency Award restraining Future Group from going ahead with its deal with Reliance Retail.
The Emergency Arbitrator has passed interim order. All parties were heard, detailed order was passed. He found he has jurisdiction and that Future Retail was bound by Arbitration : Subramanium
Senior Advocate Darius Khambata for Future Retail: We have objections to the maintainability of the petiton. This is not a section 17 of Arbitration Act. It can't be enforced.
Supreme Court bench led by CJI SA Bobde is hearing a plea by Jamiat Ulema I Hind against the communal reporting on the #NizamuddinMarkaz event which was touted to be the focal point of #COVID19 spread #SupremeCourt
CJI: Regarding Cable TV network, you are exercising power to broadcast such content. Its not a happy content
Solicitor-General: I will inform the government about this
Senior Advocate Sanjay Hegde: In the affidavit filed by the Centre, bodies which look into such content regulation has been laid out. Govt can look into it and perhaps establish an independent body
Supreme Court to continue hearing petition filed by @Facebook India chief Ajit Mohan challenging the summons issued to him by Delhi Assembly's Committee in relation to #DelhiRiots2020. Senior Adv Harish Salve for @secondatticus to resume arguments #SupremeCourt
Salve takes the court through nature of privileges.
Senior Adv Salve: It is more of a shield than a sword. Thr nature is such that you cannot carve them into weapons. Your lordships can look into this.. it is not a no go area.
Supreme Court to consider a petition filed by civil service aspirants seeking an extra attempt in the UPSC exams for those candidates who gave the last attempt in the latest exam held in 2020. @DoPTGoI
has stated no extra chance would be given
We have seen your affidavit. We would have appreciated if a secretary level officer had filed this affidavit and not an under secretary: Justice AM Khanwilkar to Centre.