🚨 We've been talking about tiny mutations in the coronavirus.

Scientists say we should be talking more about how the virus is a master of mixing *large* chunks of its genome. This might contribute to new and dangerous variation.

My latest, for @nytimes: nytimes.com/2021/02/05/hea…
Other RNA viruses make about 20-times to 100-times more tiny, single-letter mistakes in their genomes than coronaviruses do, according to Mark Denison of @DenisonLab. That's because coronaviruses have a fabulous 'proofreading' enzyme, called nsp14-ExoN. 2/n
So, tiny mutations are actually relatively *rare* in coronaviruses compared with many other viruses. One theory is that coronaviruses have this excellent proofreading because they are BIG among RNA viruses. They have around 30,000 'letters' in their genome. 3/n
In contrast, influenza and polio have around 14,000 and 7,500 letters in their genomes. Since coronaviruses are so big, there's more room for short-circuiting errors to crop up as they replicate—and their proofreading enzyme protects against that. 4/n
When scientists recently 'broke' this proofreading enzyme in a mouse coronavirus, they saw more small mutations. But—crucially—they saw less remixing of the coronavirus genome. Suggesting that the enzyme helps the virus 'recombine' its genetic bits to create variation. 5/n
Coronaviruses appear really good at recombination. But just to be clear there are different 'flavors' of this recombination:

1) a single virus remixing its copies in a cell
2) two variants of the same virus remixing in a cell
3) two different kinds of coronavirus mixing 6/n
That last category is the scariest, but scientists say they don't have much evidence that coronaviruses from very distinct taxonomic groups can mix. Seems difficult for the virus to do that. Within groups though? That looks like less of a stretch. So vigilance is needed. 7/n
Recombination is hard to study because it leaves no 'scars' in the genome.

But there's a silver lining: the nsp14-ExoN enzyme that SARS-CoV-2 uses for recombination could be its Achilles' heel. Scientists are now looking for drugs to target that enzyme: nytimes.com/2021/02/05/hea…
Antiviral like #remdesivir and ribavirin usually trip up viruses by giving them dummy RNA that trips up their replication. But it seems like coronaviruses overcome those errors with their excellent proofreading enzyme, nsp14-ExoN. This might foil remdesivir and ribavirin. 9/n
So, now Sandra Weller of @UConn is teaming up with @DenisonLab to try to develop a 'cocktail' approach that would combine drugs like #remdesivir with a compound that targets nsp14-ExoN. It was a 'cocktail' approach like this that helped us truly fight back against HIV. 10/n
Many thanks to @stgoldst, @ElEarlyBird, @katrina_lythgoe, Vincent Munster of @NIAIDNews, Feng Gao of Jinan University for speaking with me for this article. 11/n
Also a great deal of thanks goes to Geng Meng of the China Agriculture University, @virusninja and @BrianRWasik for contributing context and information for this story. 12/n

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Roxanne Khamsi

Roxanne Khamsi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rkhamsi

16 Nov 20
🚨 I’ve been reporting on this awful pandemic since February.

But this is the article I should have written months ago:

There’s a woeful lack of transparency in how governments decide their #Covid19 policies. It’s making this pandemic worse.

wired.com/story/a-lack-o…
If you’ve ever been dumbfounded by a Covid-19 rule that seems to go against everything you ever read in PubMed then this article is for you, Baby! 👆👆👆👆
Covid-19 policies have banned:

- open-toed shoes
- bars after 10pm (but not before)
- parks and playgrounds

Befuddling and dangerous inconsistencies plague policymaking:
wired.com/story/a-lack-o…
Read 4 tweets
17 Jul 20
📣 #THREAD: COVID-19 could be a double whammy for older people -- they're more likely to die from it and they might be less likely to respond to a vaccine. This might be due to "#immunosenescence" and "#inflammaging", as I describe in my latest story: nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/0…
Surprise! If you are reading this tweet and past puberty, your thymus gland -- which harbors the T cells that help train the body to make protective antibodies against new viruses (and respond to vaccines) -- is already shrinking: nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/0…
Almost a century ago, Edith Boyd helped confirm that the thymus shrinks with age. Boyd was an anatomist who combed through data from 10,000 autopsies collected at the University of Minnesota and compared them to similar findings from European scientists: nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/0…
Read 12 tweets
30 Mar 20
THREAD🧵--> For weeks, I've been tracking the scientific debate about whether we need masks to prevent transmission of the virus causing #COVID19 and whether it is #airborne. If you're confused, you are not alone. Stick with me here. Let's clear the air. 1/15
On Saturday, the World Health Organization used CAPS to say, "FACT: #COVID19 is NOT airborne." Here is the tweet. But keep reading this thread, because the wording is tricky.
As I wrote about 2 weeks ago, essentially, the word 'airborne' means something traveling in the air. But public health officials rely on a cutoff that any tiny bit of mucus larger than 5 microns in diameter that you cough out is called a 'droplet' 3/15 wired.com/story/they-say…
Read 27 tweets
25 Mar 20
THREAD --> In this time of #COVID19, I figured it might be handy to share some basics with other reporters who might be new to the health beat. What's an 'antibody'? What is 'viral load'? Here's a list of some things reporters might want to know. I'm adding to it slowly.
First off. A lot of the tests being discussed are looking for 'antibodies'. What the heck are those? In a nutshell, proteins made by certain immune cells that bind to particles in the body (usually foreign) that we call 'antigens'. Here's a 3:28min primer:
What's that? You're a reporter too busy to watch a 3:28min video? I understand. Here's a picture capturing pretty much the same thing 3/n (source: slideplayer.com/slide/9390892/)
Read 17 tweets
19 Mar 20
Got this question from a reporter friend, and honestly, I don't know what to suggest. PubMed? BioRxiv? MedRxiv?

Each publishing company seems to have it's own special page, but is there a hub where all this is being collected??
And, nota bene: only my friends get to call me Rox.
Update: @sciencecohen points to this supremely useful resource: ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/research/coron…

I don't think it captures preprints (meaning papers that have not undergone peer review), but it is really a great hub to bookmark if you are a reporter living in the year 2020.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!