A clear, concise & well-written & article by sociologist Arianna Piacentini, on the rise of (populist) nationalism & right-wing populism across Europe - a trend which, given Europe's history over the last century, should concern us all.

I'll summarise:

beta.eurac.edu/en/blogs/eurek…
Arianna starts by saying #populism has become ‘the concept that defines our age’, & the electoral surges of right-wing populist parties have been branded a ‘populist zeitgeist’.

Yet populism is - as I've said elsewhere - a slippery concept, featuring both the right & the left.
On the Right, we have parties such as the Hungarian Fidesz, the French National Front or the Italian Northern League. On the Left, Syriza in Greece & Podemos in Spain - as well as seemingly 'non-ideological' anti-establishment actors such as the 5 Stars Movement in Italy.
#Populism is based on the idea of a fundamental opposition between the ‘the pure people’ & the ‘corrupt elite’ &, populists argue, politics should be an expression of the people’s volonté générale, or, as we've been relentlessly subjected to in the UK - 'the will of the people!"
There is a general perception that #democracy seems to be slowly eroding, prompting scholars to talk of a 'crisis' or 'backslide' in democracy: we see illiberalism & ethnonationalism, nationalist & right-wing populism, are increasingly dominating Western European politics.
Orban first described a ‘zero tolerance’ policy in matters of immigration as ‘defending Europe from the Muslim invasion’.

Right-wing populists such as the Dutch Party for Freedom, AfD in Germany & Golden Dawn in Greece, also embrace this perspective.

We hear it in the UK too.
They reject both migrants (as outsiders) & the EU (as the cause - liberal multiculturalism). The in-group (the people) must be defended against both enemies from beyond (migrants, immigrants, ethnic minorities) & enemies from above (EU, UN, IMF, ‘global elites’, foreign powers).
It's no coincidence that he electoral surge of these populist nationalist parties coincided with economic (2008 financial crash) & social (migrant crisis) shocks - manifested in a generalized popular disappointment regarding both domestic & international political elites.
Historically, populist parties & leaders have always emerged as a consequence of ‘general social crises’ – think back to the 1930s - sometimes due to fractures in the power block, at other times due to the system’s inability to absorb its contradictions or transform itself.
The current Europe-wide ‘populist zeitgeist’ is no exception: the economic recession which hit Europe in 2008, & the refugee crisis which has emerged most clearly since 2015, are both determining factors in the rise of right-wing populism & nationalism, at home & across Europe.
The response to these socio-economic shocks was to turn inwards, socially & economically, manifested in the policies of ‘closing the borders’ or erecting walls. Brexit increased Euroscepticism, economic protectionism, social conservativism, & increased ‘tolerance of intolerance’.
‘The terrorism factor’ - heightened by terrorist attacks across Europe - was also used by right-wing parties as a political weapon to stress the boundary line between ‘us & them’, in turn legitimating & justifying the need for stricter policies in matter of national security .
Especially in Central & Eastern Europe, #democracy is threatened by increasingly authoritarian & illiberal tendencies – once thought to have vanished in Europe - which *could* foreshadow wider contagion across Western Europe & elsewhere.
A political class, which - while accepting & respecting the rules of the democratic game, even adopting democratic reforms - at the same time, relies on ethnic politics, clientelism & patronage, as well as nationalist rhetoric to gain consensus & electoral support (Priti Patel).
The rise of right-wing populism & the development of un-democratic & illiberal tendencies has undoubtedly been strengthened by the 2008 economic crisis – which worsened the area’s economic conditions, & sharpened pre-existing social & wealth inequalities.
These economic & social shocks also deepened disappointments & frustrations with the EU & generated both anti-elite & anti-establishment sentiment - on both Left & Right - but at home & across Europe, it is the Right who appear to have capitalised on these sentiments.
The macro-crises impacting European states & their democracies have created an environment permeated by insecurity & anxiety, sometimes worsening already precarious domestic situations.

Such an environment provides the most fertile ground for right-wing populist nationalism.
Across Europe, there is a general trend towards the closure of boundaries, exclusivism, & xenophobia, yet, at the same time, democracy & its principles are being endorsed & supported. So rather than 'backsliding', Arianna asks if democracy is going through a redefinition process.
Illiberal & quasi-authoritarian measures - advocated by the right-wing populist nationalists across Europe & supported by an increasing number of voters - are increasingly being regarded as the ultimate realisation of 'the will of the people', & thus legitimate & democratic.
These political developments are framed - predominantly but not exclusively by the Right - as measures to protect & safeguard ‘the people’ from 'cultural contaminations' & insecurities. though thankfully (perhaps) #democracy per se remains uncontested – ‘the only game in town’.
However, democracy's mechanisms & institutions are increasingly used by the right-wing populist class – & seen by an increasing portion of the electorate – as tools of exclusion & in-group protection, rather than inclusion & cooperation.

Is this where Britain really wants to go?
This article was written before the pandemic.

The developments Arianna outlines, imho, now have an added urgency: there's no doubt that the economic shock following both Brexit & the pandemic will make 2008 feel relatively mild, so we need to start preparing for the fallout NOW.
This involves urgently considering & planning concrete alternatives to the direction of travel: who wants to live in a Britain characterised by intolerance, xenophobia, & Islamophobia?

My guess & hope is that the democratic majority don't: let's reclaim 'The Will of the People!' Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GET A GRIP 💙

GET A GRIP 💙 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @docrussjackson

14 Feb
The 2020 Edelman Trust Barometer Spring Update makes interesting reading.

The survey was conducted between April 15-23, sampling more than 13,200 college-educated respondents in 11 markets: Canada, China, France, Germany, India, Japan, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, S. Korea, UK & USA. Image
67% of respondents believe that those with less education, less money & fewer resources are bearing a disproportionate burden of the suffering, risk of illness & need to sacrifice in the pandemic, & more than half are very worried about long-term, #Covid-related job loss. Image
Revitalizing the economy is important, & health & safety is paramount. 67% of respondents want saving lives prioritized over saving jobs, and 75% say CEOs should be cautious in getting their companies back to normal, even if it means waiting longer to reopen workplaces. Image
Read 6 tweets
14 Feb
A THREAD about the history of the UK press & journalism, focusing on how the 'radical press' transformed Britain.

I believe we're experiencing something similar now, with outlets like @BylineTimes, @DoubleDownNews & many others challenging the dominant free-market narrative.
A bit of context.

The Guttenberg print press, invented in 1440, changed everything.

Ordinary people now had access to information, ideas & narratives from all sorts of perspectives, thus breaking the stranglehold on the elite's domination.
Gradually at first, there was a profound shift from oral/visual culture toward print culture – kickstart age of reason, & it was transformative, giving birth to the Renaissance & the Enlightenment, & in the17th century gave rise to early #journalism.
Read 55 tweets
13 Feb
"Flag-signalling" - the practice of ostentatiously using a flag ostensibly to signify one's patriotic character, when its primary function is to encourage acquiescence from "the people" in passively accepting their own subjection & exploitation by manipulative opportunist elites. Image
Read 4 tweets
12 Feb
No-one has been "banned", & it's nothing to do with our "education system".

The irony of dangerous extremist Nigel Farage - our very own shit-stirring 21st century Oswald Mosely - describing a decision taken BY STUDENTS to drop Winston Churchill as a house name as "dangerous". Image
LIAR Nigel Farage has used racism, xenophobia, sexism & Islamophobia to stir up division, has toxic connections to extreme & far-right figures across the world, & Thatcherite beliefs that he has tried to hide from communities in former industrial towns.

hopenothate.org.uk/2019/11/15/who…
Farage on LBC Radio, 2014: “I was asked if a group of Romanian men moved in next to you, would you be concerned? And if you lived in London, I think you would be”. Asked whether he would object to living next door to German children, he replied “You know what the difference is”.
Read 61 tweets
10 Feb
#Outrage is the most profitable emotion: pundits, columnists, politicians & advertisers are trying to make us angry.

It's partly why society is so polarized: to get attention (& ad-revenue, audiences, followers etc), say something controversial!

Trump turned it into an artform.
Sparking outrage seems counter-intuitive when trying to sell or promote a product or an idea, but as Oscar Wilde said, the only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about.

84% of advertising isn't noticed - outrage gets people talking, or at least noticing.
Outrage sells newspapers & gains listeners. @Conservatives use it all the time.

It's partly why billionaires invest in people/organisations who say outrageous things, & it's why #GBNews will be deliberately provocative: it's 'good for business'.

But it's an energy-sapping trap!
Read 5 tweets
10 Feb
Britain was a much more equal society before Thatcher than it has been at any time since.

In this short THREAD, I just want to try and quickly take stock of what forty years of increasingly deregulated free-market capitalism has actually achieved.
The attacks on the welfare state in the 1980s were based on views that saw poverty as the result of individual moral failings, rather than structural inequality. This narrative has become so dominant, it is now unusual to hear the Govt attach the prefix 'structural' to any issue.
Permanent jobs and decent pensions for the masses have become a thing of the past.

British manufacturing, once the envy of the world, has all but disappeared.

Around 10 million people are trapped in insecure, relatively low-paid work, with declining working conditions.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!