🧵 Following up on the Quad ministerial held yesterday, a quick addition to my Quad charts, breaking down the readouts from Australia, India, Japan & the US. 1/
2/ The “when”: this was the 3rd ministerial of the Quad, which was revived after a decade in 2017. Beyond these senior-level meetings, the Quad countries interact in various ways (see brook.gs/3blCOXQ). This was the first hi-level Quad meeting of the Biden administration.
3/ While there had been some questions abt the fate of the Quad, over the last few weeks, comments from Prez Biden on down (incl Austin, Blinken, Sullivan) hv indicated it is here to stay for now. At yda's ministerial, the countries agreed to an annual ministerial + add’l mtgs
4/ The Quad has thus far not released a joint statement, but their individual readouts can collectively highlight their convergences & divergences, the group’s agenda, as well as particular areas of concern. This year some readouts noted “who” the members are (shared attributes)
5/ The readouts also outlined “why” the countries have come together -- they have a shared (albeit not identical) vision and goals for the Indo-Pacific region. Each highlighted particular principles/priorities within that.
6/ Some of the readouts added to the “why”: that the rules-based order in the region was being challenged. It is rare for the countries to explicitly say “by China” (in this case, Japan did refer to it), but the China bit is always present implicitly in the readouts.
7/ So “what” was on the Quad ministerial agenda & in which areas are the countries likely to consult, coordinate and/or cooperate? You can get a general sense by considering the readouts together
8/ This year, the agenda also featured the developments in Myanmar. Unsurprising, since each country has been active on the issue alone, with each other, and with non-Quad partners on the situation.
9/ The Quad readouts also recognize need to cooperate (& do cooperate) w/ other partners to ensure a rules-based order prevails - esp ASEAN but also Europe. This time Japan also mentioned Pacific Isl states, and India & Japan emph not just ASEAN centrality but also cohesion/unity
.@StateDeptSpox says that tomorrow @SecBlinken will participate in a meeting with Quad counterparts and another with E3 counterparts (+EU foreign affairs council next week)
1/ That sound u hear is the huge sigh of relief from many Indian women. A journo accused a minister/fmr editor of sexual harassment (20+others then spoke out) & found herself in the docket
We owe a debt of gratitude to Priya Ramani & other women who speak out esp vs powerful men
3/ I hope this judgment holds because a different verdict would have sent a message to Indian women: don't speak up against sexual harassment because, among other things, you will be the target of lawfare.
India will be relatively pleased w/ Lloyd Austin's remarks/answers re China, India, Indo-Pacific at confirmation hearing. It'll be less pleased -- though not surprised since he's a fmr CENTCOM commander -- re his answers on Pakistan
1/ Secretary of Defense nominee Lloyd Austin at Senate Armed Services Committee confirmation hearing:
"Globally I understand that Asia must be the focus of our effort and I see China in particular as a pacing challenge for the Department"
2/ SecDef nominee Lloyd Austin on advance policy Qs
"Globally...most significant challenge I will face will be to ensure DOD's contd efforts to prepare & strengthen the US military for a dynamic, future security landscape driven by accelerating competitions w China & w Russia.."
3/ SecDef nominee Austin in written answers says strategic competition w/ China & Russia primary challenges but "because of its ascent and the scope and scale of its military modernization, China is the top priority"
Sen. Mark Warner, currently cmte vice chair, soon to be chair: "Echoing what the chmn [Sen. Rubio] has said, perhaps the greatest challenge facing you as the DNI will be a rising China that is committed to surpassing & eclipsing the US militarily, economically & technologically"
2/ DNI Nominee Avril Haines: "we should provide the necessary intelligence to support long-term bipartisan efforts to outcompete China, gaining & sharing insight into China's intentions & capabilities..."
3/ DNI Nominee Avril Haines: "...while also supporting more immediate efforts to counter Beijing's unfair, illegal, aggressive & coercive actions as well as its human rights violations whenever we can"
🧵 A lil’ late to this but important enough an issue that I’d like to flag why I have a slightly different perspective from Jeff on this. CAATSA sanctions wld hv a greater impact on US-India relations than GSP/tariffs & cld set back 🇮🇳🇺🇸 coop & Indians' view of US. Here’s why 1/
2/ A major reason for Indian hesitations about the US historically has been the sense that as a partner it is
- unreliable
- attaches too many strings
- weaponizes interdependence
(thus curtailing Indian strategic autonomy)
3/ Comes from India seeing US
- cut off supply of mil equipment, parts in 1960s in midst of a crisis
- stepping back in 1971 from promises to help India if China attacked
-post-nuclear test sanctions
India-US rels might hv “survived” those but they were significant setbacks