I know others will have found these things before me but I've been home-schooling all day so only getting round to reading the roadmap now.
A few things stick out on first pass
(tl,dr: inequalities, testing, isolation support, social care, and inequalities).
There's a section on 'Test, Trace and Isolate' (who says NHS Test and Trace has a branding problem).
As expected, big focus on testing plus a further £400m for local gov through the contain outbreak mgmt fund - details tbc but likely much is for local testing/variant mgmt.
As have said, there remains a big challenge of people not getting tested in the first place (fear of being unable to isolate, job insecurity, caring responsibilities etc). Surveys suggest just 1/3 get tested regularly if symptomatic.
The community collect model is not going to help more underlying structural societal issues. But the added £20m/month for local gov discretionary isolation support payment is v welcome and *will* help.
The next piece missing is work with employers to help those in insecure jobs.
Bit more on testing, nothing on potential alternatives for people who find it difficult to safely isolate at home (multigenerational households etc), and this on regular testing as an alternative to isolation for contacts - lots of pilots but not ready yet.
There's plenty of what gov has done for care homes - but no more hints about any more substantive long term social care reform (also missing from the recently announced NHS reform plans)
And there's a short section on 'disproportionately impacted groups' (note, the word 'inequalities' isn't mentioned in the report once).
COVID loves inequalities, both directly & indirectly disproportionately impacting those least able to cope.
Inequalities must be front and center of all gov policy - both to directly limit transmission, and as central to an inclusive long-term socioeconomic recovery.
A commitment around new approaches to viral spread won't be enough.
Furthermore, resilience to future pandemics is far more than the establishment of the National Institute for Health Protection and improved outbreak mgmt.
It means a cross-gov approach to inequalities that ensures everyone is able to withstand future socioeconomic shocks.
This was put much more clearly by @JenniferTHF earlier today.
Case rates and positivity falling relatively fast. And across all ages.
Percentage of tests positive also falling, but this pillar 2 (community testing) graph has also been causing people some concern re young school children and returning to school - despite reported case rates being the lowest of all age gps.
The number of people being tested each week remains high at around 3m, but this is due to increasing use of rapid lateral flow devices as PCR test use falls.
The number of LFDs used has increased five-fold since the start of Jan, and 35% in the past two weeks (although noticeable slowdown this most recent week).
By contrast, PCR test use for people with symptoms fallen week on week for the past month (PHE positivity data due later).
Relative drop in prevalence between round 8 (6th-22nd Jan) and 9a (4th-13th Feb) is far greater in the S than the N and may be plateauing at around 1% in the NE.
It's helpful to know that trends in REACT generally follow trends in national PCR positivity data (in red). 2/5
Differences by deprivation group exposed yet again, plus if living in large households. Less stark differences by ethnicity (although v wide confidence intervals).
And this is AFTER adjustment for things like age, region, key work status, HH size, deprivation, ethnicity. 3/5