In @PUCTX proceedings, interested parties file comments. In Texas, #txlege set it up many years ago that anyone can file comments. In many states, you must have a lawyer. Not here #txenergy
To view the comments, go to this site and enter the control number shown in the agenda:
For example, for the filing by the Independent Market Monitor discussed so vigorously in both House and Senate yesterday, enter 51812 where it says control number
Most states have held dynamic, public facing proceedings on the evolving grid in recent years. Topics often include resiliency, cost, customer protection, etc.
In the 1990s, then Chairman @patwood3 embarked on a process of deliberative polling. The @PUCTX educated customers on energy systems and then listened to what they wanted. The process is described here in a paper called "Listening to Customers"
If we think the public matters, if we're going to call it the PUBLIC Utility Commission, then open the doors to the public. Roll out the welcome mat. Actively ASK them what they want.
Legislators have acknowledged in recent days and weeks that we underfund the @PUCTX. I talked about that in the attached article. The Commissioners didn't even know in the week after the #TexasBlackout if they had money to do an investigation. tpr.org/2021-02-19/pub…
Since then, I looked up the numbers.
PUC of Texas annual budget: $16.5m, 29m people
Michigan: $33m, 10m people
Nevada $16m, 3m people
Utah $26m, 3m people
You get what you pay for.
The @PUCTX are the regulators, the electric market police.
So when you hear politicians calling for heads to roll, ask them what their role was.
I'd like to see a lot more leaders working to strengthen regulatory oversight and public participation going forward. They need to put their money--that is, our money--where their mouth is.
If and when the PUCT budget increases, they should have an Office of Public Engagement.
Less acronyms, more dialogue with non-insiders.
This kind of democratic engagement strengthens systems. It is *itself* a form of resiliency.
Tuned in a little late but a customer who was on @gogriddy plan says to @PUCTX "he fully understood the risk." Said his bill was $3000. Says the government mandated $9000 "left customers like me unprotected." He thinks indexed customers should be repriced to $1200.
Chair D'Andrea says: Usually, we wait 60 days to publish generator outage data. Some generators did not waive the 60 days. "I need as many eyes on this as possible." There are researchers @EnergyUT looking into this, he says. He will sign an order to make all that info public now
Says customers need to get on a deferred payment plan. Encourages people to call their retail electric providers.
Hate to be repetitive but an Office of Public Engagement sure coudl help with that.
@PUCTX staff lays out 7 areas they'll pursue in response to #TexasBlackouts 1) Generation weatherization 2) Essential generation load ("need to work our way up their chain" to look at those drawing electric power to keep power running)
3) Essential customer load (e.g. people with medical equipment need to "identify absolutely everybody" with critical needs) 4) "how can we make rolling outages more granular" we want to explore reducing load on the system from commercial buildings
5) ERCOT operations: how do they implement NERC protocols 6) Communications: how do we ensure Texans get the information they need. 7) Market settlements:
Also, wholesale market design (e.g. pricing mechanism) and the retail market (the types of products and disclosures, customer protections including in a disaster)
That's 9, I think some of those were combined.
Disappointed building weatherization is not on there. @PUCTX needs to look at energy efficiency to ensure demand doesn't get to the insanely high level it reached (77GW) and that people don't die in their homes bc they aren't insulated properly.
@PUCTX staff also reports there will be an audit performed delivered to the #txlege before the end of the session.
Staff says they'll have a Winter Storm page on the website to help customers. An Office of Public Engagement would be better. Just sayin'.
End meeting.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@NathanForTexas asks for clarification on the $16b. Is that a real number?
It's an "economic number," but $5b is the real number, is what I think Bivins said.
To say that's unclear would probably be an understatement. #txlege.
The filing Bivins is referring to, the Independent Market Monitor's latest official position on the $3b vs. $5b vs. $16b is here: interchange.puc.texas.gov/Documents/5181…
They'll hear from @PUCTX Chair D'Andrea and undoubtedly have lots of questions about the $16b in charges to customer facing retailers, munis, and co-ops Feb. 18-19 that have been the source of much contention lately. Great coverage by @James_Barragan here: dallasnews.com/news/politics/…
Check out this discussion with two #txlege leaders to hear what they're thinking about solutions for dealing with future extreme weather (aka #climatechange).
@evanasmith always asks good questions. Tune in now!
@GoldmanCraig, asked why the #TexasBlackout happened, said all sources of power had failures: coal piles froze, one of the two nuclear plants froze, wind turbines froze, gas pipelines froze, and solar panels had snow.
@Menendez4Texas agrees and says he heard testimony that even if we had more gas plants, it wouldn't have mattered because you couldn't get gas to the plants.
@cohan_ds called this an "energy system failure" not merely electric system. Important bc methane gas regulators must be part of the solution. #txlege#txenergy
2/ Alison Silverstein, former PUCT and FERC staffer and true expert on these issues (Commitees: call her!) said “This industry has been treating weather events as if they’re high-impact, low-frequency. In my view, extreme weather events are [now] high-impact, medium-frequency.”
3/ On #climatechange, I said: “We’ve got to embrace the science and get smarter about how we deal with climate change. It’s hard for people. It’s hard for me to say it, but it is going to get worse and people need to understand this.”
Hey #energytwitter, if you want to tune in to the Senate and House hearings on the #TexasBlackout, links are in next tweet. I'll tweet on it throughout the day on this thread.
Please tweet using #txlege and #txenergy, esp. if you have relevent info that could help going forward
1/ Tomorrow, the Texas House and Senate will hold hearings on the #TexasBlackout. One thing I'll be listening carefully for--and likely won't hear from many on the committees--is discussion of #climatechange.
3/ Why? As I said in the @HoustonChron “We never hear the words #climatechange spoken at ERCOT because of the politics. It’s a taboo subject. We’re using the past as a predictor of the future and we can’t do that...