#INSPIRATION RCT comparing intermediate vs standard dose DVT prophylaxis, just published @jama:
-no benefit to additional anticoag in ICU patients w/ #COVID19:no reduction in mortality, MV, LOS or any 2° endpoint
-time to rethink COVID #anticoagulation? 1/ bit.ly/3vCluqK
INSPIRATION was a 10 site open-label RCT in 🇮🇷 comparing intermediate vs standard dose prophylaxis in ICU patients with PCR-confirmed #COVID19.
LMWH was the primary intervention (~40 mg vs 1mg/kg daily), dosed appropriately for weight; UFH was used if the GFR was too low.
2/
Overall the groups were balanced (total n=562) & were fairly representative of US ICU cohorts with COVID19.
The use of HFNC was very low (~3%) compared to in the US, which may reflect different practice patterns/availability.
Most patients (>90%) received corticosteroids 3/
The 1° outcome - a composite of thrombosis, need for ECMO, & mortality - was not significant:
-46% intermediate dose (ID)
-44% standard dose (SD)
There was also no difference in 30-day mortality:
-41% ID
-43% SD
This is a low thrombosis rate & a slightly high mortality rate 4/
The low incidence of thrombosis is interesting. I can think of two explanations:
-they didn’t search for minor VTEs: only 63 duplex & 21 CTAs were done in the whole study
-there may be less thrombosis now: more ICU mobility, less sedation, & faster recoveries due to steroids
5/
Some might argue that the low rate of VTE makes the study underpowered.
True except that the low rate of VTE with a high mortality rate suggests that people with COVID19 aren’t dying of (or even with) VTE. Hard to argue that anticoag is “lifesaving” in light of this finding.
6/
Aside from mortality, there was also no benefit to intermediate dose prophylaxis in terms of ventilator free days or ICU LOS.
There was also no benefit in *any* the prespecified subgroups (including patients with elevated D-dimer.)
Overall this was a very negative study. 6/
Unsurprisingly, there were numerically more bleeding events w/ intermediate dose anticoag.
Aside from 2x the bleeding risk, there was a safety signal: 6 ID pts had severe thrombocytopenia.
This suggests the risks of intermediate dose anticoag may be closer to treatment dose. 7/
Overall, I think this study is another 🚩for increased anticoagulation in people with COVID19 in the ICU.
Increased anticoagulation for an apparently “hypercoagulable” disease was a reasonable hypothesis, but it just hasn’t been validated in several high quality RCTs.
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Pre-print of the @remap_cap RCT of #anticoagulation for ICU patients w/ #COVID19 adds details but confirms what we learned from the press release:
- no improvement in survival or organ failure w/ therapeutic (TA) vs prophylactic anticoagulation (PA)
- medrxiv.org/content/10.110… 1/
This study is the amalgam of 3 large platform RCTs of TA in COVID19: @remap_cap@ACTIV4a & ATTACC.
Each trial was administered separately but as much as possible they harmonized the design so the results could be analyzed together. (a pragmatic way to enroll more pts faster) 2/
There were some differences:
-REMAP enrolled suspected & confirmed infxn; the others only enrolled confirmed
-choice of anticoagulant varied
-most importantly, the definition of prophylaxis: ~1/2 the sites used standard low-dose heparin, the remainder used “intermediate dose” 3/
Following @remap_cap & #RECOVERY#Tocilizumab results, @NIHCOVIDTxGuide has updated guidelines:
-#Toci + #Dexamethasone now recommended for all ICU pts on IMV, NIPPV, or HFNC
-Toci + Dex recommended for non-ICU pts w/ rapidly increasing O2 needs & elevated inflammatory markers 1/
There are some caveats:
-Toci must be combined with dexamethasone (not given alone; ? harm signal)
-It should be given early (w/i 3 days)
-Toci should NOT be given to people who are already immunosuppressed or who have “an uncontrolled” infxn (e.g. getting worse despite Abx) 3/
🚨Exciting results from the #RECOVERY trial #preprint of #Tocalizumab (Toci) in hospitalized people w/ #COVID19
-reduced 28-day mortality (29 vs 33%; NNT)
-decreased likelihood of requiring MV (33% vs 38%)
-shorter hospital stay (median 20 vs >28 days) medrxiv.org/content/10.110… 1/
They randomized 4116 pts to weight-based Toci vs usual care (UC):
-groups were balanced: mostly male (>65%), older (>60 yo), & w/ comorbidities (>55%)
-most patients (82%) also received dexamethasone
-they received Toci early in hospitalization but were 7-14 days after onset 2/
Notably, only 83% of patients in the Toci group actually received Toci (plus 2.6% randomized to the UC group got Toci); this would decrease the effect size and bias the towards null.
This means their ITT analysis is probably *underestimating* the true effect size somewhat.
It kinda irks me when someone describes a vital sign or lab value as “incompatible with life.”
Here’s a @tweetorial all about the extremes of physiology.
Case #1:
A 10 yo ____ presents with the following vital signs.
T 109F RR 30 HR 300 BP 142/116
Fill in the blank
Answer: 🐓
A chicken's "normal" Temp is 103-110F (w/ HR 220-360) & they live up to 11 yrs.
The Hummingbird would be quite bradycardia (“normal" HR 800-1200 when active)
The Desert ant (Cataglyphis bicolor) has a higher temp (up to 122F!) but doesn't live 10 yrs or have that BP
Case #2:
An *arterial* blood gas is obtained from a ___ showing
pH 7.37 / PCO2 50 / PaO2 20 / HCO3 26
(yup it really is arterial)
First, Abx prescribing was much higher earlier in the pandemic (January 86% vs April 63%) and higher in China (76%) compared to the US (65%) & Europe (63%).
This suggests that overprescribing may be less of an issue currently and in the US.
2/3
Second, only 5 studies (out of 154) reported the Abx duration. We don’t know if Abx was quickly de-escalated (appropriate) vs continued despite (-)cultures (inappropriate).
IMO It’s not wrong to start Abx in sick COVID pts so long as you promptly d/c when cultures are (-)
3/4
🚨BIG NEWS: In January, the unpublished VICTAS trial of vitamin C in #sepsis was stopped after enrolling just 501 of a planned 2000
Now data on clinicaltrials.gov shows why, and it doesn’t look good for #vitaminC. Is this the last🔩in⚰️of the ‘metabolic cure’?
A short🧵
1/
I’ve been hopeful but more than a little skeptical about the 🍹🍋 metabolic cocktail for sepsis (vitamin C + hydrocortisone + thiamine) since the original before/after case series.
I’ve followed this literature closely & have been waiting eagerly for the results of the RCTs.
2/
Thats’s why I was excited to see that VICTAS had posted results. bit.ly/3j3Iatl
The VICTAS trial is the largest (& arguably best) of the vitamin C RCTs: a placebo-controlled, Double-blind RCT done at 43 sites across the US. The 1° endpoint was vasopressor free days.
3/