#INSPIRATION RCT comparing intermediate vs standard dose DVT prophylaxis, just published @jama:
-no benefit to additional anticoag in ICU patients w/ #COVID19:no reduction in mortality, MV, LOS or any 2° endpoint
-time to rethink COVID #anticoagulation?
1/
bit.ly/3vCluqK ImageImageImageImage
INSPIRATION was a 10 site open-label RCT in 🇮🇷 comparing intermediate vs standard dose prophylaxis in ICU patients with PCR-confirmed #COVID19.

LMWH was the primary intervention (~40 mg vs 1mg/kg daily), dosed appropriately for weight; UFH was used if the GFR was too low.
2/
Overall the groups were balanced (total n=562) & were fairly representative of US ICU cohorts with COVID19.

The use of HFNC was very low (~3%) compared to in the US, which may reflect different practice patterns/availability.

Most patients (>90%) received corticosteroids
3/ Image
The 1° outcome - a composite of thrombosis, need for ECMO, & mortality - was not significant:
-46% intermediate dose (ID)
-44% standard dose (SD)

There was also no difference in 30-day mortality:
-41% ID
-43% SD

This is a low thrombosis rate & a slightly high mortality rate
4/ ImageImageImage
The low incidence of thrombosis is interesting. I can think of two explanations:
-they didn’t search for minor VTEs: only 63 duplex & 21 CTAs were done in the whole study
-there may be less thrombosis now: more ICU mobility, less sedation, & faster recoveries due to steroids

5/ ImageImage
Some might argue that the low rate of VTE makes the study underpowered.

True except that the low rate of VTE with a high mortality rate suggests that people with COVID19 aren’t dying of (or even with) VTE. Hard to argue that anticoag is “lifesaving” in light of this finding.
6/
Aside from mortality, there was also no benefit to intermediate dose prophylaxis in terms of ventilator free days or ICU LOS.

There was also no benefit in *any* the prespecified subgroups (including patients with elevated D-dimer.)

Overall this was a very negative study.
6/ Image
Unsurprisingly, there were numerically more bleeding events w/ intermediate dose anticoag.

Aside from 2x the bleeding risk, there was a safety signal: 6 ID pts had severe thrombocytopenia.

This suggests the risks of intermediate dose anticoag may be closer to treatment dose.
7/ ImageImage
Overall, I think this study is another 🚩for increased anticoagulation in people with COVID19 in the ICU.

Increased anticoagulation for an apparently “hypercoagulable” disease was a reasonable hypothesis, but it just hasn’t been validated in several high quality RCTs.
8/8

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nick Mark MD

Nick Mark MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nickmmark

12 Mar
Pre-print of the @remap_cap RCT of #anticoagulation for ICU patients w/ #COVID19 adds details but confirms what we learned from the press release:
- no improvement in survival or organ failure w/ therapeutic (TA) vs prophylactic anticoagulation (PA)
- medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
1/ ImageImageImage
This study is the amalgam of 3 large platform RCTs of TA in COVID19: @remap_cap @ACTIV4a & ATTACC.

Each trial was administered separately but as much as possible they harmonized the design so the results could be analyzed together. (a pragmatic way to enroll more pts faster)
2/ Image
There were some differences:
-REMAP enrolled suspected & confirmed infxn; the others only enrolled confirmed
-choice of anticoagulant varied
-most importantly, the definition of prophylaxis: ~1/2 the sites used standard low-dose heparin, the remainder used “intermediate dose”
3/ Image
Read 9 tweets
5 Mar
Following @remap_cap & #RECOVERY #Tocilizumab results, @NIHCOVIDTxGuide has updated guidelines:
-#Toci + #Dexamethasone now recommended for all ICU pts on IMV, NIPPV, or HFNC
-Toci + Dex recommended for non-ICU pts w/ rapidly increasing O2 needs & elevated inflammatory markers
1/
You can read the updated NIH COVID19 treatment guidelines here: covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/statement-on-t…

IMO, this change makes sense based on the published & pre-published data, which I discussed last month:
2/
There are some caveats:
-Toci must be combined with dexamethasone (not given alone; ? harm signal)
-It should be given early (w/i 3 days)
-Toci should NOT be given to people who are already immunosuppressed or who have “an uncontrolled” infxn (e.g. getting worse despite Abx)
3/
Read 5 tweets
11 Feb
🚨Exciting results from the #RECOVERY trial #preprint of #Tocalizumab (Toci) in hospitalized people w/ #COVID19
-reduced 28-day mortality (29 vs 33%; NNT)
-decreased likelihood of requiring MV (33% vs 38%)
-shorter hospital stay (median 20 vs >28 days)
medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
1/
They randomized 4116 pts to weight-based Toci vs usual care (UC):
-groups were balanced: mostly male (>65%), older (>60 yo), & w/ comorbidities (>55%)
-most patients (82%) also received dexamethasone
-they received Toci early in hospitalization but were 7-14 days after onset
2/
Notably, only 83% of patients in the Toci group actually received Toci (plus 2.6% randomized to the UC group got Toci); this would decrease the effect size and bias the towards null.

This means their ITT analysis is probably *underestimating* the true effect size somewhat.

3/
Read 13 tweets
5 Jan
It kinda irks me when someone describes a vital sign or lab value as “incompatible with life.”

Here’s a @tweetorial all about the extremes of physiology.

Case #1:
A 10 yo ____ presents with the following vital signs.
T 109F RR 30 HR 300 BP 142/116

Fill in the blank
Answer: 🐓

A chicken's "normal" Temp is 103-110F (w/ HR 220-360) & they live up to 11 yrs.
The Hummingbird would be quite bradycardia (“normal" HR 800-1200 when active)
The Desert ant (Cataglyphis bicolor) has a higher temp (up to 122F!) but doesn't live 10 yrs or have that BP
Case #2:
An *arterial* blood gas is obtained from a ___ showing
pH 7.37 / PCO2 50 / PaO2 20 / HCO3 26
(yup it really is arterial)

Fill in the blank
Read 14 tweets
5 Jan
Meta-analysis of antibiotic prescribing in #COVID19 inpatients finds:
-74.6% received antibiotics 💊
-8.6% had bacterial co-infection 🧫

At first glance, this suggests that we’re *way* overprescribing Abx in COVID. But there are some caveats.
1/3

clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-…
First, Abx prescribing was much higher earlier in the pandemic (January 86% vs April 63%) and higher in China (76%) compared to the US (65%) & Europe (63%).

This suggests that overprescribing may be less of an issue currently and in the US.
2/3
Second, only 5 studies (out of 154) reported the Abx duration. We don’t know if Abx was quickly de-escalated (appropriate) vs continued despite (-)cultures (inappropriate).

IMO It’s not wrong to start Abx in sick COVID pts so long as you promptly d/c when cultures are (-)

3/4
Read 4 tweets
25 Sep 20
🚨BIG NEWS: In January, the unpublished VICTAS trial of vitamin C in #sepsis was stopped after enrolling just 501 of a planned 2000

Now data on clinicaltrials.gov shows why, and it doesn’t look good for #vitaminC. Is this the last🔩in⚰️of the ‘metabolic cure’?

A short🧵
1/
I’ve been hopeful but more than a little skeptical about the 🍹🍋 metabolic cocktail for sepsis (vitamin C + hydrocortisone + thiamine) since the original before/after case series.

I’ve followed this literature closely & have been waiting eagerly for the results of the RCTs.
2/
Thats’s why I was excited to see that VICTAS had posted results. bit.ly/3j3Iatl

The VICTAS trial is the largest (& arguably best) of the vitamin C RCTs: a placebo-controlled, Double-blind RCT done at 43 sites across the US. The 1° endpoint was vasopressor free days.
3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!