Election Commission will notify the Rajya Sabha elections for 3 vacancies from Kerala (that will arise later this month on the retirement of the MPs) prior to the expiry of the term of these 3 MPs i.e. before April 21, 2021, #KeralaHighCourt told.
Adv Deepu Lal Mohan (for EC) says that the reason why HC was moved was because the earlier notification was kept in abeyance.
A revised election schedule will be issued. At this moment, it cannot be speculated when it will be scheduled, but it will be before April 21, he adds
Senior Advocate CS Vaidyanathan, for the petitioner, argues that the Election Commission must disclose why the initial date for the Rajya Sabha elections was reconsidered in the first place and what reference of the Law Ministry was involved.
CS Vaidyanathan: What are the circumstances that are weighing with them that is not enabling them to take a decision is not disclosed... This, to me, is rather mysterious.
Vaidyanathan: I do not see what he is withholding. The President has been issuing ordinances, a new CJI appointment has been announced, both ECI and the President are available. I don't know why they are delaying the process
Deepu Lal Mohan: It is within the exclusive domain of the election commission. Commission, in its wisdom, announced the first date, it is now revised...Let the schedule come
Vaidyanathan says that ECI's discretion under Art 324 is subject to statutory time limitations
Vaidyanathan: They are excising power in a completely arbitrary fashion... What made them do this? They can’t merely say that they will issue the notification at any date they choose.
Deepu Lal Mohan is now reading case law on elections to the #RajyaSabha.
Mohan: The earlier press release was kept in abeyance... Press note did contain a statement that reference has been received (from the Union Ministry).. (however, my instructions are that) the central ministry or any other ministry has no say
Vaidyanathan: What were the extraordinary circumstances for keeping in abeyance is not disclosed. there is a total lack of transparency. it is an unreasoned order. This order will have to go.
Advocate Navaneeth urges the #KeralaHighCourt to direct the ECI to produce all relevant records pertaining to the earlier decision to keep in abeyance the #Rajyasabha elections
We are entitled to know, he argues.
CORRECTION: The above submission was by Senior Advocate NN Sugunapalan
Mohan says that before the revised election schedule is issued, it is mere assumptions as to what will be the date etc.
Vaidyanathan: Kindly note that the counsel for the ECI fairly states he doesn't know the reason why it was kept in abeyance, therefore he cannot appraise the court. Therefore all the more reason that the records of the EC must be (given to the court)
#Breaking: #KeralaHighCourt asks Election Commission of India to file a statement on the reasons for earlier postponing the Rajya Sabha elections for vacancies that would arise upon the retirement of 3 Kerala MPs on April 21, 2021. Matter posted on Friday
Justice PV Asha: Furnish the reasons which are with you. if I direct to get the files, it will take more time. You can file a statement on the reasons.
Court takes on record submission by Election Commission that it would notify the Rajya Sabha elections before April 21, 2021, and also submissions by petitioners that no reasons have been given by ECI for earlier postponement.
"Therefore, there shall be a direction for the respondent to file a statement disclosing the reasons based on which it was decided to postpone the elections."
Court also notes submission by the petitioner that the ECI had referred to a Law & Justice Ministry reference being under examination while informing of decision to keep in abeyance the Rajya Sabha polls.
#SupremeCourt to hear Centre's application to close the criminal trials pending in India against two Italian marines accused of killing two fishermen off the coast of Kerala in 2012.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had said the victims’ families have been compensated
SG: You are aware of about the incident. Dispute was who can prosecute the Italian Marines. It was held that trial will be by Govt of Italy. Italian government was directed to compensate the families of those who were killed.
SG: Indians are the best negotiators and we have negotiated a good deal. They have paid 10 crores more. Victims have accepted it now
A five-member committee to be constituted comprising of eminent persons, experts well-versed with archaeology, two members preferably from minority community.
An expert to be appointed as observer for the committee
Committee prime purpose is to find whether religious structure standing at the disputed set is a superimposition, alteration or addition or if there is structural overlapping of any kind over any other religious structure
#MadrasHighCourt seeks response on the anti-corruption set up in the State, the degree of independence afforded to the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) and the number of corruption cases attended to in the last 3 financial years.
During the hearing today, Court also posed queries on how secure the DVAC is and the extent to which its own officers have indulged in #corruption.
“…we want to know how secure is your Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption", CJ Sanjib Banerjee orally observed
"We have no doubt you have a very attractive website, 20,000 pages of nothing written, but we want to get to the meat of the matter… Or are we in such a fool's paradise that we have to believe that there is no corruption over there?“ CJ Banerjee remarked.
Special Bench of Supreme Court led by CJI SA Bobde to hear a plea filed by NGO Lok Prahari seeking appointment of Additional Judges to High Courts under Article 128 of the Constitution #SupremeCourt #judgesvacancy
Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul led bench of the #SupremeCourt to hear appeals by Maharashtra govt and former Home Minister Anil Deshmukh against the Bombay HC order allowing CBI probe into allegations made by Param Bir Singh against @AnilDeshmukhNCP #SupremeCourt @OfficeofUT
Senior Adv Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi: I appear for Maharastra. Note three striking things. On March 21 one Jayshree Patil complains within 48 hrs she files a writ on March 23 is not on board. No listing. Param Birs writ was listed on March 23
Singhvi: On Marcv 31, matter was heard only on maintainability. The AG of Maharashtra argues on the same and division bench records that hearing was on maintainability, admission and interim order. #SupremeCourt
The cases goes back to 2000 and concerns alleged irregularities relating to the issue of 12 crore equity shares in January 2000 by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) at a price of Rs. 75 per share to 38 allottee entities.
As per Regulation 11(1) of Takeover Regulations, RIL was obligated not to make additional acquisition of more than 5% of voting rights in any financial year unless it made a public announcement to acquire shares.