#SupremeCourt to hear Centre's application to close the criminal trials pending in India against two Italian marines accused of killing two fishermen off the coast of Kerala in 2012.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had said the victims’ families have been compensated
SG: You are aware of about the incident. Dispute was who can prosecute the Italian Marines. It was held that trial will be by Govt of Italy. Italian government was directed to compensate the families of those who were killed.
SG: Indians are the best negotiators and we have negotiated a good deal. They have paid 10 crores more. Victims have accepted it now
SG: Italian embassy responded it agreed on the compensation of ₹ 10 crores to be paid as total compensation under all heads. Govt of Kerala in letter dated Nov, 2020, stated that victims would recieve 4 crores and other to the boat owners.
SG: Revised Italian offer over and above ex gratia was acceptable to Govt of Kerala
SG: criminal proceedings are going on. The proceedings have to be closed by you under Article 142
Senior Adv Jaideep Gupta appears appears Kerala: We have accepted the offer. This money should be deposited in #SupremeCourt first before proceedings are quashed as no enforcement mechanism in place
Justice V Ramasubramanian questions the Solicitor-General
Advocate Karthik appears for victim: No amount has been paid yet as per international Tribunal award
Senior Adv Suhail Dutt: I appear for Italy. We have agreed to 10 crores for all the four heads. How it is distributed is upto Centre
CJI: deposit the amount in this court. We will say Solicitor-General consents to the deposit and then we will disburse it. When will you deposit
Dutt: We were waiting for an account number by MEA
CJI: Republic of Italy states amount of compensation in terms of award passed on May, 2020, will be paid by Italy to India in the particular account specified by MEA. We direct that after such transfer the said amount be deposited in #SupremeCourt within one week thereafter.
CJI: list the matter on April 19.
CJI to SG: I wish you Act with the same speed in other matters too. Here you say 3 days but in other weeks.
SG: I assure you we will. Depends on which ministry we are dealing with.
While hearing a plea for door to door vaccination, #BombayHighCourt enquired with the Union as to how could political leaders get vaccinations at home while the citizens could not.
Chief Justice Dipankar Datta: Important political leaders get a jab at home. How do political leaders get a vaccine at home and other cannot? There has to be a uniform policy.
Adv Sunil Gonsalves appearing for NIA submits that the statement which Waze wanted to give to the court somehow got leaked out in the media despite directions from court to file the same in Court as per procedure under CrPC.
Court: I never said don’t file. I only said proper procedure under CrPC has to be followed. This ought not have happened and this should not happen again.
ECI tells #KeralaHighCourt that on the eve of notifying #RajyaSabha elections for 3 vacant seats for members from Kerala retiring on April 21, Union Law & Justice Ministry had raised a question of propriety that popular will not be reflected if RS polls are held on April 12
Union Law & Justice Ministry had requested ECI to revisit the decision to conduct #RajyaSabha polls on April 12 since the Kerala Legislative Assembly elections were on April 6, #KeralaHighCourt told by Election Commission via a statement.
Since this issue of propriety was raised, the ECI kept the initiation notification in abeyance and sought legal opinion from a senior advocate, Advocate Deepu Lal Mohan submits on behalf of ECI
Kerala Gold Smuggling: Hearing to resume today before Kerala High Court in the plea by @dir_ed Deputy Director challenging FIR registered by @TheKeralaPolice against unnamed officials of ED.
A five-member committee to be constituted comprising of eminent persons, experts well-versed with archaeology, two members preferably from minority community.
An expert to be appointed as observer for the committee
Committee prime purpose is to find whether religious structure standing at the disputed set is a superimposition, alteration or addition or if there is structural overlapping of any kind over any other religious structure
#MadrasHighCourt seeks response on the anti-corruption set up in the State, the degree of independence afforded to the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) and the number of corruption cases attended to in the last 3 financial years.
During the hearing today, Court also posed queries on how secure the DVAC is and the extent to which its own officers have indulged in #corruption.
“…we want to know how secure is your Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption", CJ Sanjib Banerjee orally observed
"We have no doubt you have a very attractive website, 20,000 pages of nothing written, but we want to get to the meat of the matter… Or are we in such a fool's paradise that we have to believe that there is no corruption over there?“ CJ Banerjee remarked.