Background: the federal govt's Home Owners' Loan Corporation was a New Deal org aimed at helping people keep their homes post-Depression. Financially, it did pretty well - even turning a small profit 2/ trumanlibrary.gov/library/public…
But to "help" mortgage lenders, they generated maps of urban areas, color-coded by how "secure" neighborhoods would be for home loans. Here's the RVA map - guess what they based "security" on? 3/
This should be obvious, but to be clear: rather than look at important individual financials - credit history, outstanding debt, etc. - HOLC based broad maps on nabe's "detrimental influences" and "inhabitants," literally using the word "infiltration" to apply to race 4/
You may have seen these maps before, but have you really looked at how they were generated? A HOLC agent, in this case realtor J.D. Carneal, typed up the forms. Like, a dude had to literally type "Negroes are crowding out white men" 5/
[BTW, Carneal was from a prominent RVA family of architects and real estate folks; there's a Carneal Street in the East End, and a real estate firm still bears the name. Google shows lots of celebratory writing about fam w/o any mention of their assoc w/ redlining]
6/
My "favorite" note is from Randolph/Byrd Park, which was classified as "declining" because "the negroes of D-8 pass back and forth for access to the William Byrd Park which lies to the west". it's a bad nabe literally because black folk walk through it 7/
This was 1937, but it matters today, for so many reasons. Another @UR_DSL project shows how this redlining leads to environmental and health impacts (tree coverage, impervious surfaces, "heat islands," etc.) that persist today: 8/ storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/1a945c…
Anyway, If anyone ever wants to know what "systemic" or "institutionalized" racism is, show them this map - racism infused into the basic rules we live by, with long-term consequences rippling through generations
9/End dsl.richmond.edu/panorama/redli…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Happy weekend VA! Earlier this week I tweeted out #VoteNoOn1, the redistricting commission amendment. I'm still a No, but feel a Prof's need to clarify after hearing from some folks on both sides #Thread 1/
Earlier I said we all want Non-partisan, but even A1 supporters say that's basically impossible. What we actually want is INDEPENDENCE. Current SB 5015 tries to specify criteria for citizen members beyond "party picks" so it would help if passed 2/
But doesn't get over the fact that legislators are on the commission, and that one or two of them could use their veto power for mischief. In an uneven partisan environment (where GOP routinely kicks Dems' ass on process/power) I don't see a way around that 3/
Good morning VA! As early voting ramps up around the state, now’s a good time to remind you to Vote NO on Amendment 1, which supposedly ensures fair redistricting. I’m not convinced. Here's why: #VoteNOon1 #Thread 1/
Background: you probably know that “redistricting” - drawing district lines for state legislature and Congress - is super important is for setting the political course of the next decade. So do politicians, which is why they try to control it 2/
A coalition pushed for fair, non-partisan process by 2019 deadline. (Constitutional amendment in VA needs GA to pass a resolution twice, then approved on voter ballot Q.) They didn't get it! Instead, they put in place a compromise
3/
Anyone check out the #RVAProtests "112 Days" show on @CBS6 last night? You can watch it on MSN (linked below), but I did so you don't have to. Two big thoughts: #Thread 1/
First, the doc not great on repping protestors. Some efforts to give voice to protest, but probably not central figures. I get it - it's hard to parse, there's no "President of the Movement," and lots of folks probably didn't want to talk
2/
But still - why so much freakin' Mark Holmberg? Why let him complain that protestors marched at Lee Circle but not Gilpin Court- and then ignore multiple anti-eviction actions? 3/ richmond.com/news/local/wat…
Stoney's tenure has been a roller coaster of ups and downs. Before #GeorgeFloyd, it seemed the failed #NavyHill development would be the albatross that possibly ended his career. But the #BLM protests have made his re-election prospects even trickier
2/
A lot of folks, largely conservatives and property owners, oppose protests by default. They don't understand them, & rely on media and authorities who continue to refer to "violence" and "looters" to de-legitimize any political claims that animate them
3/
Good article from @nedoliver in the @MercuryVirginia today documents state legislators' proposals for civilian police review. But it shows how law enforcement will muddy the waters to try to prevent oversight. A quick #thread 1/
Chesapeake chief Kelvin Wright opposes civilian boards with disciplinary powers. Not because they would fire bad officers - he worries boards "would be too lenient"! 2/
But he's airing a particular gripe he has against a civilian grievance board reinstating a single officer. This is an HR/grievance issue with a cop he's tried to fire. It has NOTHING to do with civilian oversight 3/ pilotonline.com/news/crime/vp-…
Original CRB: the 1948 Complaint Review Board in DC. Idea (going back to Progressive Era) is to provide oversight of police by folks from outside the corps of sworn officers. Data hard to find (and police don't like to give it)
2/
BUT necessary - police internal review doesn't work (#PCPTP , or police cannot police the police); and elected oversight fails because of fear (don't want to be called weak on law-and-order politics). Police are NOT your typical bureaucracy
3/