U.S. payrolls grew by +266k, which would be fabulous in normal times, but is utterly disappointing at a moment in which forecasters expected +1 million jobs, and we’re still missing millions of pre-pandemic jobs.

This is a big miss that changes how we think about the recovery.
Unemployment is stuck at 6.1%, well above the pre-pandemic rate of 3.5%, and that’s despite the fact that millions are still not looking for work.
We are still 8 million jobs below pre-pandemic levels, or about 10 million jobs below where we would have been if pre-covid trends had continued. That’s why we need much faster job growth.

There are millions in need, an economy that remains sick, and a recovery that’s ailing.
Utterly baffling to see a recovery stalling with 8 million fewer jobs and then hear talk of a ‘labor shortage.’

Do you really think 8 million people lost the will to work?

Sound like weak labor demand.

Or if it’s labor supply, it’s not a labor shortage, it’s a safety shortage.
This one simple trick can turbo charge the recovery: Get vaxxed, get your friends to join you, make the marketplace safe, and watch people return.
If counterfactual you would have interpreted a strong payrolls report as evidence that labor demand was running ahead of labor supply stoking concern about a ‘labor shortage,’ then you shouldn’t also be in the business of seeing a weak payrolls report and yelling ‘labor shortage’
Shoutout to the folks at the CEA, who on this difficult jobs report day chose to report the numbers as they are, without undue political spin.
BTW, labor supply may turn out to be a big part of the problem holding back the recovery, but the labor supply issues aren’t excessively generous benefits, laziness or not wanting to work: They’re safety and childcare. Fix those before whining about a’ labor shortage.’

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justin Wolfers

Justin Wolfers Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JustinWolfers

8 Jan
In December the U.S. economy lost -140,000 jobs, and THE RECOVERY HAS STALLED JUST LIKE I WARNED.

We lost 22 million jobs in Feb & March, then regained half of them, and now we've stalled, with the economy in a deeper jobs hole than the darkest days after the financial crisis.
The glimmer of good news here (and it's only a glimmer) is that October and November were stronger than we thought, and revisions added +135k to those months.
But there's no way around the depressing fact that the economy is in a hole as deep or deeper than anything following the financial crisis, the mechanical bounceback is behind us, and further progress has stalled.
Read 13 tweets
4 Dec 20
Payrolls in November rose a mere +245k. That's the sort of number you might see in a "normal" month, and definitely not what you're hoping for in the snapback from a covid-induced shutdown.

THE RECOVERY IS STALLING.
Remember, the economy lost 22 million jobs, then gained roughly half of them back.

We still have 10 million fewer jobs than we did in February. Clawing the rest back at +245k per month will take basically forever. If this is the second half of the recovery, it's going to be grim
The dramatic ups and downs of recent months might hide the real story here: The economy is in a deep hole -- as deep as in the darkest days following the financial crisis -- and the recovery is faltering. Barely there. Making no progress. Stalled. Stopped.
Read 14 tweets
9 Nov 20
To explain the inside joke: The more the coronavirus makes in-person interactions dangerous, the more valuable Zoom is.
So Zoom's stock crashing can signal that traders believe we're making progress in the war on the virus — like today's news about a potentially powerful vaccine.
A successful vaccine would be a huge boost for vast swathes of the (non-Zoom) economy. While the stock market is not the economy, the sharp rise in broad stock indices gives you a a sense of the tremendous optimism that this would be a huge boost.
Summarizing the early results from the trial.
Read 5 tweets
6 Nov 20
Payrolls +638k in October, and the unemployment rate has fallen by a full percentage point to 6.9% (even as participation rose).

A very strong household report, with a weaker (but pretty much as expected) payrolls report.

Sadly, the payrolls report is usually more informative.
That unemployment rate is worth digging into. It comes from a separate survey, in which employment was reported to have grown by a massive 2.2 million.

This decline in unemployment occurred even as the labor force grew 724k.

It's good news, but from the less reliable survey.
Usually payrolls growth of +638k would be fantastic news. But right now, much less so.

The economy lost 22 million jobs Feb-Apr, and had made half of that back by Sept.

If we crawl back the remaining 11 million jobs at this rate, it'll take ages. The recovery is worryingly slow
Read 9 tweets
3 Nov 20
Lemme tell you a little about why I'm not putting much weight on prediction markets this election. The short version is that the main US market, @PredictIt, is structured in a way that allows big mis-pricings to persist.
Right now, you can sell a share that pays $1 if Trump wins, for 40 cents. I would love to do that. But there are large transaction costs that get in the way, and they're so big that it would be wrong to infer that markets believe that Trump is anywhere near a 40% chance to win. Image
Let's say that I'm willing sell 1000 of these shares, effectively buying "Not Trump" shares for 60 cents. If so, I'll lose $600 if Trump wins. You might think that I stand to win $400 if Trump loses, but that's not quite the whole story, because transaction costs are a big deal.
Read 14 tweets
29 Oct 20
GDP rose by +7.4% in Q3 (pretty much exactly as expected), after falling by -9.0% in Q2 and -1.3% in Q1. All told, the economy is -3.5% smaller than it was at the end of 2019.

For context, the economy is roughly as far below its peak as in the darkest days of the last recession
When the economy rises by +7.4%, some will report this as being at an "annualized rate" of 33.1%.

Lemme be crystal clear: This does not mean that the economy is now one-third bigger. (Lemme explain...)
Reporting *quarterly* GDP growth at an *annualized* rate answers the question: If the economy also grew at this rate for the next 3 quarters, how much larger would the economy be?

But there's no chance that will happen, so the annualized rate answers a question no-one is asking.
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(