No, #HR1 is not a “partisan power grab.” Key provisions like automatic voter registration, early voting and redistricting reform are based on policies Republicans overwhelmingly support at the state level, and under which they have done very well electorally.
It’s not a “federal takeover” of elections either. State and local officials will continue to run elections. #HR1 simply sets a federal floor for voting access, as Congress is explicitly permitted to do under the Constitution and has done many times before.
#HR1 doesn’t allow non-citizens to vote. It makes voter registration easier, but only for citizens. Dozens of states have already passed the same reforms and there is zero evidence of widespread non-citizen voting.
#HR1 won’t lead to more “voter fraud.” People already use most of the voting methods the bill requires in dozens of states, and have been doing so for decades. Yet voter fraud is so rare, an American is more likely to be struck by lighting than commit it.
#HR1 doesn’t give taxpayer money to politicians. It does include a new voluntary program to match small donations to candidates so that they don’t have to rely on big donors, but the program isn’t funded w/ taxpayer money. There is language in the bill that says that point blank.
Remember, $$ for campaigns must come from somewhere. If you don’t want billionaire megadonors to have all the clout, you need an alternative. #HR1 is the first serious attempt in decades to offer one federally + other corruption-busting reforms that voters overwhelmingly support
Of course, we can debate all this stuff on the merits. But it would be better to focus on what’s actually in #HR1. Here’s a decent high-level summary: washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/…
And if you want to take a deeper dive, we put together an annotated guide explaining each provision and the rationale behind it, with links to the actual text. brennancenter.org/our-work/polic…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
👉 First, they would guarantee the freedom to vote, and take a huge bite out of the wave of voter suppression laws sweeping the country, as explained here: brennancenter.org/sites/default/…
👉Modernize voter registration
👉Restore voting rights to the formerly incarcerated
👉Expand opportunities for early + mail voting
👉Require use of voter-verified paper ballots
👉Restore the full power of the landmark Voting Rights Act to combat discrimination.
Yesterday’s #Acquittal of Fmr. President Trump (by senators representing barely 1/3 of the country) underscores the urgent need to repair American democracy, beginning with swift passage of the landmark #ForThePeopleAct (a/k/a #HR1 and #S1) brennancenter.org/our-work/polic…
#HR1 includes the most ambitious expansion of voting access for eligible voters since the Voting Rights Act of 1965. Automatic + same day voter registration. Restoration of voting rights to the formerly incarcerated. Expanded early + mail voting. A commitment to restore the #VRA
Never forget that the #CapitolInsurrection was spurred by lies about “voter fraud” that have driven increasingly brazen #VoterSuppression efforts, primarily targeting Black and brown Americans. Trump harnessed these lies to try an overturn the election, but he didn’t invent them.
The Supreme Court has dismissed the remaining lawsuits against Fmr. President Trump for violating the Foreign and Domestic Emoluments clauses, constitutional provisions barring POTUS from taking benefits from foreign govts and US states. The ball is now in Congress’s court.
The Emoluments Clauses are critical safeguards whose enforcement would have stopped some of the worst corruption of the Trump years. Huge credit to the many individuals + orgs that rescued them from relative obscurity and brought them into the public consciousness.
But one-off lawsuits were always going to be an uphill battle, requiring tremendous resources. To truly give full effect to these provisions, Congress needs to establish a clear statutory framework for applying them + robust enforcement mechanisms.
The @WSJ is out with an editorial today slamming the historic democracy reforms in #HR1 with the same tired arguments they and others have deployed many times before. Let’s take them one by one, shall we? 1/many
First, we have dog whistle arguments about “California-style election rules” —a/k/a rules that make it easier for all eligible voters to cast their ballots, even voters who — gasp — need food stamps.
Virtually all of these changes have already been adopted in many states of varying political hues. Automatic voter registration, one of the most significant, passed the Illinois House unanimously.
Important to acknowledge that pardon abuse isn’t a new problem, but as usual this president has taken it to a new level. That’s been true for a while. brennancenter.org/our-work/analy…
Fortunately, there is excellent legislation already pending before Congress, the Protecting our Democracy Act, which addresses pardons among a number of critical issues. It deserves swift passage.
This is called “giving in the name of another” and if knowing and willful, it’s a federal crime to do or ask others to do. washingtonpost.com/investigations…
Of course there is no way to be sure just from a news article if that’s what happened here. But even if lawbreaking wasn’t intentional, it is still deeply troubling (I’d certainly like to know which “former FEC general counsel” told them it was ok).
The problem, of course, is that we don’t have a functional regulator in this space—the @FEC is completely broken. That fosters a culture of impunity where deeply troubling conduct like this becomes a perfectly acceptable way to get ahead.