'Build rapport' is at the heart of #communication skills training and #CX
It's obviously good to have good conversations, but what does ‘building rapport’ look like ‘in the wild’ – and does it 'work'?
1. Thread. 🧵
2. What actually counts as rapport building – in terms of words and phrases and 'tone of voice' – is "amorphous” and “nebulous”, says G.B. Rubin (2016) in her thesis on crisis #negotiation
'Active listening' and related concepts sound good but they're also imprecise.
3. One common piece of advice (and instruction) to ‘build rapport’ is to ask, “how are you today?”
‘How are you’ have also been called “the three most useless words in the world of communication"🤔
Let’s have a look at some salespeople ‘building rapport’ in #B2B conversations.
4. This is a 'cold' telephone call between a salesperson and prospective client from a series of studies by me, @BogdanaHuma & @rein_ove.
The goal is to get an appointment with a new client. The salesperson responds to a non-existent "how are you" from the prospective client 🙄
5. Here's another #B2B sales call that looks very similar. The salesperson isn't listening. The prospective client doesn't want to 'build rapport'.
6. In this #B2B call, the salesperson IS listening. He hears the lack of reciprocation from the prospective client (who does not ask 'how are you' in return) and moves to the reason for calling - and gets the appointment in the end.
7. In this case the call is between a salesperson and an EXISTING client – someone that he doesn’t need to ‘build rapport’ with. He doesn’t ask ‘how are you’ and gets straight to business. But, as he is talking to someone he knows, the client expects to exchange ‘how are yous’ 😬
8. Asking someone you have not previously encountered “how are you today” does not build rapport.
Like the previous #B2B cold calls, this university call-taker replies (after a delay) to the student's “how are you” but does not return the question.
9. Here’s a thread on why the statement that that ‘how are you’ are “the three most useless words in the world of communication” is wrong.
But 'how are you' doesn't ‘build rapport’ either - because you can’t build rapport on your own 🗨️🗨️
10. It’s not just salespeople who both try to build rapport and don’t listen properly. Here’s a call to the vet’s. The caller wants to know how much it would cost to get injections for her puppy. While some pet owners want lots of "puppy chat", this one just wants the price...
11. ... as we (@MagnusHamann) show, the call goes *on and on and on* before getting to a price. And just because the caller says "brilliant" and "lovely" doesn't mean things are "brilliant" or "lovely" and the caller turns down an appointment when offered.
No rapport built.
12. In fact, ‘building rapport’ can take just ONE turn.
Here’s two ways that a customer gets to use a café’s WiFi. In both cases, the café has WiFi so the outcome is the same. But in one, the customer has to push the request, while in the other, they don't even have to ask.
13. In our research on crisis negotiation, @rein_ove and I found that explicit expressions of 'care' were often rejected the persons in crisis ("You don't care, you're just doing your job"). In this case, behind-the-scenes advice to express care does not go well.
14. Yet, in this final example, the negotiator can ONLY risk saying to the person in crisis that she's "talking to him cos she has to" because she really does 'have rapport'. Moments later, the person in crisis comes down safely.
15. In sum:
It’s obvious when someone is doing ‘building rapport.’ People can spot it a mile off.
'Rapport' is the OUTCOME of an effective encounter.
And it is RECIPROCAL - you can't 'have rapport' on your own.
Some questions are *standardized* (e.g., surveys, scripts, instructions) and require reading out loud, word for word.
In business, research, law, medicine, etc., do people "just read them out"?
TL;DR: No. And there are consequences.
1. 🧵
2. We might take it for granted that, when 'standardized', questions will be the same whether spoken or written. The examples in the thread will show they're not.
Without examining actual interaction, we won't know the clinical, diagnostic, legal, etc. consequences either way.
3. Let's start with @rolsi_journal's research on the significant consequences of the way diagnostic instruments about #QualityOfLife are delivered in talk, compared to how they're written on the page.
2. If a person threatening violence can hear you on the phone, using ‘small talk’ - in this case, saying "y'all right" at precisely the place where it would routinely appear in an ordinary conversation - will help you sound like you’re having an ordinary conversation.
3. The caller uses her tacit knowledge that saying "y'all right" (or similar, like “how are you”) at this point in a call is routine and ordinary, helping the conversation sound routine and ordinary.
“How do open-ended questions improve interpersonal communication?”
TL;DR: They do not.
Let’s explore a common #communication assumption about 'open' and 'closed' questions with some data to see what they look like, and what they do, in real interaction.
1. Thread. 🧵
2. Google "open and closed questions” and you’ll find loads of articles and (often written or hypothetical) examples about them - tweet 1 is just one of many.
As @d_galasinski pondered recently: “I wonder who is responsible for fetishising open questions.”
3. When we examine questions as they are actually used - ‘in the wild’ - we find that yes/no (‘closed’) questions routinely receive more than ‘yes/no’ in response.
And just because a question is ‘open’ doesn’t mean it'll be answered.
Regarding the UK gov's new Covid campaign (“Act like you've got the virus”), I was asked on @SkyNews yesterday if “there is a problem with compliance now in terms of people adhering ... is the message is clear enough?”
Preparing took me down messaging rabbit holes.
🧵
2. On Friday night, to prepare for the interview, I duly looked at @DHSCgovuk's campaign.
Prof Whitty speaks to camera: “We must all stay home. If it is essential to go out, remember wash your hands, cover your face indoors, and keep your distance from others.”
3. The new campaign combines March 2020's strap-line – “Stay Home>Protect the NHS>Save Lives” with new messages (e.g., about the new variant).
“We all NEED” (below) is not the same as Whitty's “We MUST” - or the very clear "You MUST stay at home" text message from March 2020.
1. From Stay Home to Stay Alert, UK government messaging has been much discussed during the #COVID19 pandemic. #IndieSAGE has analysed its effects (March-Oct 2020) and makes recommendations for a communication reset.
2. It is through language that #COVID19 laws, regulations, rules, and guidance are written - which must be understood, interpreted, and acted upon by people. Precise messaging is easier to understand and act upon.
3. While 90% of people believed that “Stay home, protect the NHS, save lives” was clear, "Stay Alert" was immediately challenged, rejected by other UK nations, criticized, satirized, and - crucially - not understood by 65% of people.