5-judge Bench of Calcutta High Court to resume hearing in case relating to Narada scam where CBI is seeking transfer of trial to High Court on law and order grounds.
This is a matter of seminal importance. It is the first time in this democracy and possibly in any democracy some Constitutional functionaries laid siege to an investigation agency's office which was investigating a case on this Court's order: SG Tushar Mehta.
I would also cite precedents in how Constitutional functionaries are expected to conduct themselves: SG Tushar Mehta
This is not merely a petition for transfer under s. 407 but it also invokes this Court's Constitutional prerogative powers under Article 226, supervisory powers under Art 227 and inherent power under S. 482 CrPC: SG Tushar Mehta
These are not isolated incidents but have happened before too in West Bengal where high Constitutional functionaries resort to threat and intimidation: SG Tushar Mehta
The Pinochet judgment carves out a third principle of what the common man's perception is and whether judge could remain objective or not as per a reasonable observer: Tushar Mehta
Could an observer get an impression that the acts of people outside court led to a situation where judge could not exercise his discretion properly? This should be looked into: Tushar Mehta
The bias we are speaking about on the part of the judge is not bias due to the judge's personal prejudice but due to the fear created by acts of people outside the court: SG Tushar Mehta
The judge knows there is a crowd. The judge might not have been influenced it. But will a fair minded individual observer get an impression there won't be fair hearing in the matter, asks SG Tushar Mehta
The test is not whether judge was actually influenced or not. But what is relevant is whether an individual observer felt there is likelihood of bias: SG Tushar Mehta
Peaceful protests and assembly is allowed under our Constitution. It is allowed against executive action. So how does it create an impression in a common person that such a protest will influence judiciary: Justice IP Mukerji
The hearing was on a virtual platform. He had no information that there were somebody outside. Will that influence the judge: Justice Soumen Sen to SG Tushar Mehta
The judge might not have been aware. It is not necessary for judge to be aware and be biased. The test is what a reasonably informed common man would feel about the proceedings: Tushar Mehta.
If so, your counsel could have asked for adjournment of proceedings: Justice IP Mukerji.
Court should not restrict to the bail order alone: Mehta
This was engineered and orchestrated and accused benefitted from it. The crowd outside the special court dispersed only after bail was granted: SG Tushar Mehta
Mehta seeks to distinguishes instances of crowd gathering in cases of film stars and godmen.
Those might not be orchestrated especially film stars. Godmen 50 percent it could be: Tushar Mehta
Instances of orchestrated hooliganism (in case of politicians) have happened before also in West Bengal. This is not solitary incident. This happened before also when Police commissioner was sought to be arrested by CBI: Tushar Mehta
Courts must look at the impression other people might get. This flows from the principle that 'justice must not only be done but also seem to be done'.
Senior Advocate AM Singhvi for Luthra: There is a clause which puts in place a waiting period for lawyers from leaving and joining others. We are happy to waive this clause
#BombayHighCourt at Goa is hearing plea filed by Rahul Mhambre, convenor of AAP Goa raising grievances at the Super Specialty Block of Goa Medical College and hospital.
Hearing before Bench of Justices SC Gupte and MS Sonak.
Court: We will give you (State) time to respond. But we want to point out, two things, drinking water has to be provided. Movable screens for the patients have to be provided, this is a question of human dignity.
AG Devidas Pangam appearing for State:
First of all, I do not know what is the urgency in this. We will look into the grievances, but I am wondering how did he get access to the COVID ward.
Instead of moving the court for this, he could have approached us.
#BombayHighCourt to hear plea seeking door-to-door #COVIDVaccination for citizens above 75 years of age and those who are specially-abled or bed-ridden.
Hearing before Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni.
The Court had on May 20 directed the National Expert Group on Vaccine Administration for COVID-19 (NEGVAC) to examine the feasibility of door to door COVID vaccination for elderly and disabled citizens.