Reading back through my original thread when they announced mass testing, I got sent the link to the Heads test and trace briefing on last day of term, only around 500 attended, most were probably too busy notifying close contacts.
First section was of logistics of mass testing
The government clearly hadn't thought through trying to test a whole school twice a week on site, they solved it with the 2 tests in school then the rest at home.
Idea was students would learn how to do it right from the video they and staff watched.
The data showed that this would reduce reliability, roughly 50% accuracy was estimated from some real world trials,less in others, think it was Birmingham Uni trials where they picked up 2 or 3 put of 60 +ve PCRs
Less safe but always felt it was more about the pretence of safety
I've got the original handbook don't know if its changed, focus was on logistics and reliability but a lot of the book seems more focused on government controlling the narrative
Have a read, suprised the skeptics didn't start shouting about this
Israel has shown more patience than UK, borders closed, waited for more vaccination before starting to reopen, less death, less long covid, less economic damage, more chance of maintaining freedoms.
I assume that's when the over 50s have been double dosed.
It also means schools will be about to break up, and although the gov pretends otherwise they know schools are acting as Delta hubs.
3/ Been saying for a while I think the government believes the quickest route to herd immunity with what they consider an acceptable death and health toll is
2 jab over 50s
1 jab 18-50s
Natural infection for under 18s
Its a gamble based on impatience and pandering to lobbyists
If we had an adequate media then everytime a minister was interviewed they'd be asked about when the government will finally invest in ventilation.
All the evidence says this is one of the most important measures.
2.Even skeptics are going to struggle to portray clean air as an attack on our freedoms, if anything we have a right to clean air.The impact of pollution on health and in particular on children is clear
Can anyone remember the last time a minister was asked about ventilation?
3. Can anyone ever remember a minister being asked about investing ventilation in the whole pandemic?
UK government's total failure to address this is stark
So is the failure of the media to hold the gov to account for this glaring hole in their Covid strategy.
1/🧵@MattHancock just now in the Commons
Secondary students are seeing largest rise of Delta cases.
Children are much less likely to be harmed but they are "more transmissible"
Then he twice ignored questions about why masks have been removed in secondary
3/ Which is a bit odd seeing as I've been fed a daily diet of being told that there's no sign of meaningful transmission in schools and that children hardly transmit
Media have found lots of experts and pediatrics quite certain theres nothing to see here
🧵Somehow in the UK we have a narrative that vaccines and masks are important for everyone except children.
Every hour experts and gov advisors are in the media claiming school arent really contributing to infection rates and arent driving Delta growth
How can children not be impacting infection rates when so many are being infected?
If over 40% of cases in my LA are in schools,how is that not significant? Local PH director says it is, PHE report says it is,yet PHE blog disagrees with own report? vip.politicsmeanspolitics.com/2021/06/05/bor…
3/ UK reports find infections high in children, other countries look at UK data as sign of the impact of schools on transmission, yet the reporting of these studies and data seems to completely minimise children's role in transmission.