So the next question is, did the UK government know?

We've been raising concerns about how unreliable these seem when used in the real world.

Also wondering, did the UK gov produce findings that seemed to match the manufacturers claims that the FDA disputes?
Quick scroll through bookmarked threads....

Boom🧨

Gov claiming they have studies that back the manufacturer

So have FDA missed the Oxford study?
Is the Oxford study wrong?
Is the UK gov misleading?
Have I got it mixed up?

Do other countries use these?
Reading back through my original thread when they announced mass testing, I got sent the link to the Heads test and trace briefing on last day of term, only around 500 attended, most were probably too busy notifying close contacts.

First section was of logistics of mass testing
The government clearly hadn't thought through trying to test a whole school twice a week on site, they solved it with the 2 tests in school then the rest at home.
Idea was students would learn how to do it right from the video they and staff watched.
The data showed that this would reduce reliability, roughly 50% accuracy was estimated from some real world trials,less in others, think it was Birmingham Uni trials where they picked up 2 or 3 put of 60 +ve PCRs

Less safe but always felt it was more about the pretence of safety
I've got the original handbook don't know if its changed, focus was on logistics and reliability but a lot of the book seems more focused on government controlling the narrative

Have a read, suprised the skeptics didn't start shouting about this
On top of this we have experiments being carried out in schools to replace isolation with a different brand of LFD that we have less data about

Perhaps they should focus on cutting transmission with proven measures rather than trying to skip isolation
They've spent a fortune on LFDs but won't recommend masks, in over 450 days secondary students have only worn masks for 40 school days

@MattHancock says he understands their importance today but ignores questions about why gov removed them from schools
Israel has shown more patience than UK, borders closed, waited for more vaccination before starting to reopen, less death, less long covid, less economic damage, more chance of maintaining freedoms.

The one place they think needs masks?
Schools
UK schools policy

Class size? 30
Social distancing? No
Ventilation? No
Masks? No
Recovery Funding? £50

Questionable LFDs? Yes please, we'll have shit loads

How to make sense of this... Image
State capture - is a particular type of political corruption
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_cap…
This government is dangerous
bylinetimes.com/2021/06/10/ind…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Karam Bales

Karam Bales Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @karamballes

13 Jun
🧵Several @LBC callers today have been quoting disinformation they read in the @Telegraph

The narrative in the article here is wait 4 weeks then let it rip because that will be the sweet spot.

So the idea is to get the over 50s double dosed and then away a Delta wave to spread
2/ Why will we reach a sweet spot in 4 weeks?

I assume that's when the over 50s have been double dosed.

It also means schools will be about to break up, and although the gov pretends otherwise they know schools are acting as Delta hubs.
3/ Been saying for a while I think the government believes the quickest route to herd immunity with what they consider an acceptable death and health toll is
2 jab over 50s
1 jab 18-50s
Natural infection for under 18s

Its a gamble based on impatience and pandering to lobbyists
Read 18 tweets
12 Jun
1🧵A Mad Plan, is this the only way?

If we had an adequate media then everytime a minister was interviewed they'd be asked about when the government will finally invest in ventilation.

All the evidence says this is one of the most important measures.
2.Even skeptics are going to struggle to portray clean air as an attack on our freedoms, if anything we have a right to clean air.The impact of pollution on health and in particular on children is clear

Can anyone remember the last time a minister was asked about ventilation?
3. Can anyone ever remember a minister being asked about investing ventilation in the whole pandemic?

UK government's total failure to address this is stark

So is the failure of the media to hold the gov to account for this glaring hole in their Covid strategy.
Read 9 tweets
10 Jun
🧵Concerns are raised around the DfE continuing with experiments to use LFD to scrap isolation when only close contacts are asked for consent.

No suprise Munro pops up to explain that actually it would be unethical not to experiment in schools.

This isn't reassuring. Image
Here's the thread so you can see his arguments made for continuing the trials.

Having read his reasoning, I do have some questions.
Read 8 tweets
8 Jun
NEU and Unison press release on protecting education
#edutwitter
#ReleaseTheDataOnSchools
1/4 Image
2/4 Image
3/4 Image
Read 5 tweets
7 Jun
1/🧵@MattHancock just now in the Commons
Secondary students are seeing largest rise of Delta cases.
Children are much less likely to be harmed but they are "more transmissible"

Then he twice ignored questions about why masks have been removed in secondary
2/ Higher transmissibility in school children

Higher transmissibility in school children!

No answer on masks

No answer on masks twice!
3/ Which is a bit odd seeing as I've been fed a daily diet of being told that there's no sign of meaningful transmission in schools and that children hardly transmit

Media have found lots of experts and pediatrics quite certain theres nothing to see here
Read 15 tweets
6 Jun
🧵Somehow in the UK we have a narrative that vaccines and masks are important for everyone except children.

Every hour experts and gov advisors are in the media claiming school arent really contributing to infection rates and arent driving Delta growth Image
How can children not be impacting infection rates when so many are being infected?

If over 40% of cases in my LA are in schools,how is that not significant? Local PH director says it is, PHE report says it is,yet PHE blog disagrees with own report?
vip.politicsmeanspolitics.com/2021/06/05/bor…
3/ UK reports find infections high in children, other countries look at UK data as sign of the impact of schools on transmission, yet the reporting of these studies and data seems to completely minimise children's role in transmission.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(