It stands out and is completely incongruous with the emerging fact pattern of this case.
🟥 RED
IT READS ❮AS IF❯ downing of #PS752 was nothing more than a matter of negligence, a 'failure to take proper care in doing something.'
"Tragedy" is more great loss and misfortune, even calamity. It's benign and it minimizes.
FIRSTLY, it flies in the face of a recent Ontario Superior Court ruling: "The plaintiffs have established that the shooting down of Flight 752 by
3
the defendants was an act of terrorism and constitutes 'terrorist activity' ..."
SAID IN OTHER WORDS, it has been now ruled that this was NOT an accident, but deliberate; NOT a tragedy, but an ATROCITY
It is literally, a 'mass murder'.
OUR CHOICE OF WORDS MATTER. Referring
4
to #PS752 as a "tragedy" is ill-considered and entirely inappropriate.
ONLY «ATROCITY» carries with it the reality of the barbarity and savageness necessary to deliberately shoot down a civilian airliner.
IT IS DOUBLY PREPOSTEROUS to issue a weak statement like this one
5
containing a (glaring) twofold defect, namely: "failed to recognize the danger of their military operations" coupled with "neglected to take measures to prevent this tragedy."
MAKE NO MISTAKE, this is not nuance, it is the unadulterated language of milquetoast.
6
THIS PHRASEOLOGY lays bare either a complete failure to grasp what has actually occurred as an act of brutality, or it reveals an attempt to tiptoe carefully through extra-linguistic signalling and understatement.
Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 (PS752) was shot down
7
deliberately, not by accident.
TO BE CLEAR, and the Ontario court has ruled, two (2) sophisticated Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (#IRGC) Tor M-1 missiles fired from advanced battery systems about 30 seconds apart is ❮NOT❯ accidental.
8
AND SINCE it has now been found to be a deliberate act (the "Intentionality Scenario"), it necessarily follows that the Iranian regime had a reason(s) to destroy this particular aircraft.
The #Iran regime has consistently demonstrated a capacity for outrageous brutality.
9
IT TAKES monstrous inhumanity and evil to destroy a civilian aircraft with innocent souls aboard ... AND it challenges and defies our comprehension.
NONETHELESS, any hope of identifying the reason(s), can only come through a competently-conducted criminal investigation.
10
IT MUST BE a dogged investigation, as only our grim persistence and tenacity will yield answers.
AS FOR the reason(s), there are only two possibilities. Suffice it to say, the answer lies in 'a person or persons' AND/OR 'something' [italics] were aboard that aircraft.
11
🟨 YELLOW
THE WORDS "justice, transparency and accountability" sound reassuring and consequential in the context of this statement.
BUT FOLLOWING a weak embedded statement, however these words become more or less a feeble assertion. AND,its feebleness won't be lost on #Iran.
12
It is not difficult to imagine the #Iran regime scoffing when it reads such banal and threadbare words like "failed", "neglected" and "tragedy", without the teeth of Canadian criminal investigation.
'Justice' and 'accountability will not be realized in the near future.
13
As a trained/designated Major Case Manager, I can say the type of criminal investigation required for #PS752 will need time and resources. Nonetheless, it must be embarked upon with a long view perspective and unrelenting tenaciousness, sufficient to last decades if required.
14
Any thought or hope of receiving any semblance of anything approaching 'transparency' from #Iran should be set aside immediately as unrealizable and not realistic.
A Canadian criminal investigation is the only means by which to achieve justice and with it, accountability.
15
IN CLOSING, as a former @rcmpgrcpolice#RCMP (Ret'd), I am utterly outraged by the shocking and indefensible position presently being taken by RCMP Commissioner @CommrRCMPGRC Lucki.
The position she has chosen to adopt is untenable. AND, I have every confidence it cannot be
16
long sustained. I will be addressing her decision not to open a Canadian criminal investigation in the coming weeks.
17
FINALLY, «ATROCITY» should become forthwith the ONLY descriptor used by #GOC in all future communications whenever referring to Ukraine International Airlines Flight 752 (PS752).
"Tragedy" has no rightful place going forward as Canada pursues justice and accountability.
3
IN THE COMING WEEKS that answer will begin to take shape.
PLAINLY, Transport Minister ALGHABRA has not been authorized to refer to #PS752 as an «ATROCITY». He remains shackled by PMO @CanadianPM to a narrative that permits the use of "tragedy" only.
THIS WEEK "Kingston [City] Council has decided to move the statue of Sir John A. Macdonald to his gravesite, pending Indigenous consultation." @PaulSoucyygk via @CKWS_TV@globalnews#YGK
3/5 THE HORRIFYINGLY RUTHLESS use by Amherst of this crude form of biological warfare was callous brutality and a crime against humanity.
AND YET Amherst Island, named in honour of Jeffrey Amherst, 1st Baron Amherst, and its
2/7 This position adopted is untenable. And, I have every confidence that it cannot be sustained.
FIRSTLY, it flies in face of a recent Ontario Superior Court ruling by Justice Edward Belobaba [Zarei v Iran, 2021 ONSC 3377 | Court File No. CV-20-635078 (dated 20210520)]:
3/7 "The plaintiffs have established that the shooting down of Flight 752 by the defendants was an act of terrorism and constitutes 'terrorist activity'..." p. 12
SAID IN OTHER WORDS,this was not an accident or tragedy, but an ATROCITY [literally, a 'mass murder'].
SAID MILDLY, regardless of the eventual determination that will be made with respect to the appropriateness of "terrorism (-related)" charges in this horrific case ±
3/3 such a statement made by Members of Parliament, who are persons in authority, is at the very least premature and not appropriate.
THIS STATEMENT can be viewed in different ways. But regardless of how it appears,it contributes to a perception that the course and outcome of ±
1/3 AS A FORMER #RCMP (Ret’d), I am concerned about such statements being made by ANY politician.
RISKING SERIOUS UNDERSTATEMTN, they are at best inappropriate, and could even be viewed as an attempt to otherwise ‘direct’ [italics] the course and/or outcome of an investigation.
2/3 AS AN INVESTIGATOR, I was always mindful of and exercised vigilance with respect to my responsibilities to never cause to bring the administration of justice into disrepute.
MOST REGRETTABLY, such statements can carry the taint of political interference. The appropriate
3/3 police agency with jurisdiction - @lpsmediaoffice (and possibly with assistance of @rcmpgrcpolice) will and must assess the evidence without any regard for such statements. I have every confidence that they will do just that.
2
during 2015 federal election #Elxn42, I can say @JohnIbbitson DOESN'T approach the blight existing between the floorboards.
IN ALL FAIRNESS THOUGH - that is not the focus of @JohnIbbitson's op-ed. Column space is limited.
Far from being a welcoming "Big Blue Tent",
3 @CPC_HQ is riddled with a not-so-nice undercurrent of 'shenanigans and subterfuge' [polite description]. Actually, it could be said to be a type of rot.
The undercurrent (or if one prefers, rot) is resulting in a hemorrhage - a damaging loss of valuable people.