Thread by @FreedomFriesInc

(1) These 4 questions are the most important ones to be asked about 1/6.

Instead of weaving a false narrative like media hack Tucker Carlson's, we should all be asking these questions until we get adequate answers.

A #Jan6Commission would have HELPED (actual) conservatives.

https://twitter.com/OliviaTroye/status/1394994793747566594

(2) Supporting details for the above:

1. The parts of the nat'l guard that should have been deployed AROUND the Capitol on the MORNING of 1/6 were solely under the jurisdiction of the sitting POTUS, ie Trump.

That land around the Capitol is FEDERAL land, not Congressional.

(3) Therefore, it's irrelevant whether Speaker Pelosi or anyone else who happens to oppose Trumpism wittingly or unwittingly reduced the security presence on her "patch." BTW, former SenMajLdr McConnell had the same rights & duties in this regard.

Trump's "patch" was around it.

(4) Everyone knew that the rioters had to pass over the federal exec branch land before reaching the Capitol environs, which are under the control of BOTH House and Senate.

There can be no excuse for Trump not knowing this. In fact the evidence of failure is damning for him.

(5) Trump failed to ensure proper security on the land under his control BEFORE the riot, then was implicated in the unconscionable & needless delay in deploying enough personnel to regain control & start cleaning up the place.

Security for such events is MULTI jurisidiction.

(6) Which brings me to Question 2:

"Why did DHS not do the analysis & issue their usual threat assessment in prep for a major event?"

We need to know why, and officials need to be subpoenaed and the law enforced. If they want to dodge the question, they can do it on live TV.

(7) The duty of DHS is to do all it reasonably can to prevent terrorist attacks & reduce harm. It's their core business; and (arguably) why they were established.

Millions of members of the public could see there would be violence on 1/6. I assumed security would be adequate.

(8) The remaining two questions are covered by what I said above.

@OliviaTroye, a career homeland security & counter terrorism expert, is a key witness to what went on in the Trump admin before she resigned in August 2020.

She knows what went wrong & enabled 1/6 to happen.

(9) Every 1/6 assertion made by Tucker Carlson can be easily countered using the available evidence, and simple logic.

I've read in full as many of the (so far) 450 charging documents as I can.

Almost all were clearly & definitely Trump supporters.

justice.gov/usao-dc/capito…

(10) The number who weren't Trump supporters, was tiny. Since Republicans are always talking about personal responsibility for choices, it is grossly hypocritical to assert that hundreds of violent criminals only did it because a fake Trump supporter told them to.

(11) I don't let Democrats off the hook, though. Biden, Harris, Pelosi, Schumer, and Merrick Garland have a duty to ensure all of these cases are prosecuted to their fullest extent.

If they fail to do that, they are contributing to the worsening trend of civil unrest in the US.