[Data Thread] I haven't done a British politics thread in a while, but was curious about public anger towards @MattHancock ! What follows is a thread analyzing those who've tweeted at Hancock since beginning of June. #sackmatt#thematterisnotclosed
2) First, I scraped around 23,361 tweets. As you can see, there is a big spike in tweets to @matthancock on 25th June, when news of his kiss properly broke. (nb: The scraping method doesn't include all tweets, and tends to favour more recent tweets from what I can tell)
3) Since the same people probably tweet at @matthancock a lot, I removed duplicate tweeters using an algorithm. This resulted in around 15,175 unique users tweeting at Hancock. As you can see, the pattern of tweets is roughly the same #sackmatt
4) I did a corpus analysis of these tweets, analysing them for the most common word. Interestingly, but perhaps unsurprisingly, the most common word was 'resign'. (I am excluding matthancock and https as they are just account data). 11% (1591)of 15175 tweets from unique accounts
5) used the term resign. And if there was any doubt, the context for using the term resign was almost always a demand that he resign. That's a lot of people asking Hancock to resign #SackMatt#TheMatterIsNotClosed#matthancock#matthanock
6) If you analyse the progression of tweets today and tomorrow, you can see there is an increased percentage today of people calling for @matthancock to resign - possibly due to continued anger, perhaps due to the video of the kiss being released. If we assume the data scraped
7) disperses error evenly then we can assume a greater percentage of people are demanding that Hancock resign today than yesterday (certainly on Twitter - even though we have a bit less data today). 24 % of tweets at Hancock today call for him to resign, compared to 16% yesterday
8) It would be interesting to keep tracking this trend, to see the extent to which public anger at Matt Hancock rises and eventually falls. In theory sustained or increasing anger may lead to his resignation, and it would be interesting to see what the threshold is.
9) I may add some network analysis later but that's it for now. To some up, the major mood to Hancock today is a demand to resign. This trend is increasing, and might continue to increase if public attention remains fixed and captured by the issue! #sackmatt
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
[Thread 1/4] Strange true story. When I was 21 I worked in #Sudan as an English teacher. Immediately prior to my arrival in Jan 2007, our small 'British English' school had taught the Ministry of Humanitarian Affairs, the Minister of State for whom was Ahmed Haroun. In April
2/4 that year the ICC issued a warrant for the arrest of Ahmed Haroun for war crimes and crimes against humanity. That month, our small school had published new promotional pamphlets advertising the school. Right on the front page, was a small feature congratulating those
3/4 students from the humanitarian ministry who passed their English exams. Right next to it, in full colour, was the below picture of our English director, beaming and handing Ahmed Haroun a giant trophy! Needles to say, myself and some of the teachers expressed our concern
"Although it appears that Al-Siddiq was killed in a tragic road accident in Oxfordshire, England, it has not stopped partisan commentators in the region from exploiting the tragedy as a tool of disinformation to smear her, her family and the political enemies of the UAE."
"Numerous commentators, many linked to the United Arab Emirates, have sought to sew conspiracies that she was assassinated, either by Qatar or by the Muslim Brotherhood"
[Thread] 1) I've had a chance to look at the HJS report that are the basis for the May 2021 Times article and June 2021 article in the Telegraph. There's no doubt Iran is a bad actor with regards to digital disinformation, but this type of reporting is somewhat disingenuous
2) My main concern is that both articles are based on the same report by the @HJS_Org . Although HJS_Org are known for their Islamophobic, neo-con agenda, that is not particularly new. What I find bizarre is that there are two mainstream newspapers commenting on the report as if
3) it were providing new and revelatory information, giving it a 'scoop' and sensationalist quality when in fact all the information about Iran's manipulation on Facebook and Twitter has been revealed by either FireEye, FB themselves or Graphika. No new networks have been
Happy to announce that my article in IJMES is now open access (free to read). Digital De-Citizenship: The Rise of the Digital Denizen in Bahrain cup.org/3cgeo36 cc @QNLib@HBKU@CHSS_HBKU#Bahrain
"Beyond autocratic Bahrain, democratic states such as the UK & the US enable and abet the erosion of digital citizenship. The global surveillance industrial complex, less regulated than the arms trade, although no less insidious, has profited enormously from the Bahrain uprising"
"Perhaps the most striking notion of this is the dystopian potential of a civil society simulacrum, one in which online performances of citizenship are neatly orchestrated by autonomous accounts to give the illusion of a functioning and healthy public sphere" #disinformation
2/6 It starts with accounts tweeting the suspicious hashtag in isolation (why would you tweet a deliberately nonsensical hashtag spontaneously unless it was co-ordinated?) Graph shows tweets (i.e. not RTs, mention etc) in green starting off the activity
3/6 Almost all the tweets that begin the hashtag are sent from iphone (see turqouise colour). Again, multiple accounts, tweeting a strange hashtag in isolation, using the same devices)
Summary, there is a network of around 629 sockpuppet accounts using 'chopped hashtags' to drown out a hashtag advertising a broadcast from Saudi dissident @oamaz7
2/8 As this screenshot shows, the original hashtag promoting broadcasting of @oamaz7 is بث عمر عبد العزيز while the chopped hashtag takes four consecutive consonants from the middle of the hashtag: مر عب
3/8 As with similar networks, the accounts do not generally interact with each other. The fact they are tweeting the same nonsensical chopped hashtag 'independently' of each other with few RTs indicates it is co-ordinated sockpuppet activity.