The format of UEFA’s competitions will change next season with the addition of the Europa Conference League to the existing Champions League and Europa League, so I thought it might be interesting to see how this will impact the revenue distributions in 2021/22.
UEFA estimate gross revenue will increase by €250m (8%) from €3.25 bln to €3.5 bln. €323m is deducted to cover competition-related costs, while €105m (3%) is set aside for qualifying rounds, €140m (4%) for non-participating clubs and €10m for Women’s Champions League.
That leaves €2.92 bln net revenue, of which €190m (6.5%) is reserved for European football and remains with UEFA, while €2.732 bln is distributed to the participating clubs, split Champions League €2.032 bln (74%), Europa League €465m (17%) and Europa Conference €235m (9%).
Total revenue distribution increases by €192m (8%) from €2.540 bln to €2.732 bln. This growth has funded the Europa Conference €235m, along with a €95m (17%) decrease in Europa League (albeit down from 48 to 32 clubs), while Champions League will be €52m (3%) higher.
As a result of COVID-19, revenue in 2019/20 was reduced by €531m with €416.5m impact on participating clubs. This will be deducted in equal shares over five seasons (from 2019/20 to 2023/24) in proportion to each competition. This works out to around 3% of each club’s revenue.
Clearly, the Champions League retains the lion’s share of UEFA revenue with its €2.032 bln being nearly 3 times as much as the Europa League and Europa Conference combined (€700m). The difference is particularly stark for the UEFA coefficient (based on 10-year rankings).
The importance of distribution elements varies by competition. In the Champions League prize money and UEFA coefficient lead the way (both 30%), while in the Europa Conference participation and prize money are most significant (both 40%). TV pool very high (30%) in Europa League.
In 2021/22 each of the 32 clubs in the Champions League group stage get €15.64m plus €2.8m for a win and €930k for a draw. Additional prize money for each further stage reached: last 16 €9.6m, quarter-final €10.6m, semi-final €12.5m, final €15.5m and winners €20m.
The 2021/22 Champions League prize money has therefore risen by 3% over the current cycle with the highest increase (5%) reserved for the winners. The maximum amount that a club could earn (excluding TV pool & coefficient) is up €2.6m from €82.5m to €85.1m.
Each of the clubs in the Europa League group stage get €3.63m plus €630k for a win and €210k for a draw. Additional prize money: win group €1.1m (runners-up €550k), knockout round €500k, last 16 €1.2m, quarter-final €1.8m, semi-final €2.8m, final €4.6m & winners €8.6m.
The 2021/22 Europa League prize money has risen by 10% over current cycle with the highest increase (24%) in the participation fee, but only 1% more for the winners. The maximum amount that a club could earn (excluding TV pool & coefficient) is up €2.1m from €21.3m to €23.4m.
Each of the 32 clubs in the Europa Conference group stage get €2.94m plus €500k for a win and €166k for a draw. Additional prize money: win group €650k (runners-up €325k), knockout round €300k, last 16 €600k, quarter-final €1m, semi-final €2m, final €3m & winners €5m.
The Europa Conference has a decent participation fee of €2.9m, but the big money (€5m) is reserved for the tournament winners. The maximum amount that a club could earn (excluding TV pool & coefficient) is €15.5m.
The Champions League prize money overall is 3.6 times the Europa League and 5.5 times the Europa Conference, but this varies by round. In general, the difference becomes smaller the further a club progresses, e.g. last 16 it’s 8x and 16x, while for winners it’s only 2.3x and 4x.
The UEFA coefficient payment was introduced in 2018/19, based on performances in UEFA tournaments over the past 10 years, including bonus points for winning UEFA tournaments, so it benefits the traditional big clubs like Real Madrid, Barcelona & Bayern Munich.
The Champions League €600.6m UEFA coefficient pot is divided into shares worth €1.137m, so the highest ranked club gets €36.4m, while the lowest gets €1.1m. In the Europa League payments range from €4.2m to €132k, while the Europa Conference goes from €1.4m to €45k.
Champions League clubs clearly benefit most from the UEFA coefficient payments, as these are nearly 9 times as much as the Europa League and no less than 26 times as much as the Europa Conference. Some have argued that this is UEFA’s way of trying to prevent a Super League…
Champions League TV pool distribution: (a) first half is based on position in previous season’s Premier League – winners 40%, 2nd 30%, 3rd 20%, 4th 10%; (b) second half based on progress in current season’s Champions League. After the 3% increase, England up from €68m to €70m.
Europa League TV pool distribution: (a) first half based on previous season’s domestic competitions – cup winners 60%, league 40% (if cup winner does not qualify, split equally); (b) second half based on progress in current season’s Europa League. Down 17% over previous cycle.
Europa Conference TV pool distribution follows the same model as the Europa League, albeit with smaller amounts. My estimate of €5.2m for England is based on applying the overall split of the TV pool between Europa League and Europa conference to the previous English amount.
Based on these assumptions, we can estimate the maximum that English clubs could earn from Europe. Taking the highest ranked qualifier (based on league position), #MCFC would earn €133m from Champions League, #LCFC €44m from Europa League and #THFC €21m from Europa Conference.
It is worth noting the impact of exchange rates on the amounts received by English clubs. In our illustrative example, #MCFC €133m would be £114m at current rate of 1.17, but it would be up to £117m if the rate were the 1.14 used in the 2019/20 Deloitte Money League.
These figures underline the importance of qualifying for Europe, especially the lucrative Champions League, as the financial difference in the three competition is evident. Once again, it’s a case of “the rich getting richer”, posing more questions about competitive balance.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Swiss Ramble

Swiss Ramble Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SwissRamble

22 Jun
Manchester United have announced financial results for Q3 of 2020/21, incorporating the first 9 months of the season. This covers January to March 2021, so provides further insight into the impact of COVID. Some thoughts in the following thread #MUFC
For Q3 #MUFC pre-tax loss improved from £29m to £23m, despite revenue dropping £5m (4%) to £118m, a £1m loss on player sales and expenses rising £7m (5%). This operational decline was offset by net interest payable falling from £25m to £1m thanks to forex gains.
The main reason that #MUFC revenue only fell 4% in Q3 was £33m increase in broadcasting to £59m, due to return to Champions League, which compensated for COVID influenced reductions in match day, down £28m (95%) to £2m, and commercial, down £10m (15%) to £58m.
Read 35 tweets
8 Jun
#CardiffCity 2019/20 accounts cover a season when they finished 5th in the Championship following relegation from the PL, losing in the play-off semi-final. Manager Neil Warnock was replaced by Neil Harris in November 2019, since succeeded by Mick McCarthy. Some thoughts follow.
#CardiffCity swung from £3m profit to £12m loss, as revenue fell £79m (63%) from £125m to £46m due to relegation and COVID, partly offset by profit on player sales rising £12m to £14m, while expenses were down £33m and no repeat of prior year £20m provision for the Sala transfer. Image
#CardiffCity £79m revenue fall was largely driven by broadcasting’s £70m (66%) decrease from £107m to £37m, due to lower TV money in Championship, though commercial also dropped £5m (48%) from £10m to £5m and match day fell £4m (53%) from £8m to £4m. Image
Read 43 tweets
1 Jun
Stoke City’s 2019/20 financial results covered a season when they finished 15th in the Championship, two years after relegation from the Premier League. Manager Nathan Jones was replaced by Michael O’Neill in November 2019. Some thoughts in the following thread #SCFC
#SCFC pre-tax loss widened from £15m to £88m, as revenue dropped £21m (29%) from £71m to £50m and profit from player sales fell £15m (83%) from £18m to £3m. Total expenses increased £37m, mainly due to £43m impairment charge (reducing player values). Loss after tax was £86m.
The main reason for #SCFC £21m revenue reduction was broadcasting, which dropped £20m (39%) from £51m to £31m, mainly due to lower parachute payment, though match day also fell £1.6m (25%) from £6.4m to £4.8m. In contrast, commercial rose £0.9m (7%) from £12.9m to £13.8m.
Read 42 tweets
31 May
#BarnsleyFC 2019/20 accounts covered the club’s first season back in the Championship following promotion from League One, when they narrowly avoided relegation by finishing 21st. Head coach Daniel Stendel was replaced by Gerhard Struber, since succeeded by Valerien Ismael.
#BarnsleyFC are owned by a group of international investors, led by Chien Lee of NewCity Capital and Paul Conway of Pacific Media Group, who follow the “Moneyball” approach of fellow investor, Billy Beane. They bought 80% from former custodian, Patrick Cryne, in December 2017.
Following promotion to the Championship, #BarnsleyFC reduced their loss from £3.4m to just £0.3m, as revenue increased £6.4m (83%) from £7.8m to £14.2m and profit on player sales rose £2.0m to £5.8m, partly offset by expenses growing £5.6m (37%) to £20.5m.
Read 39 tweets
24 May
Queens Park Rangers 2019/20 financial results covered a season when they finished 13th in the Championship, an improvement on the previous year’s 19th place, though the campaign was disrupted by COVID-19. Some thoughts in the following thread #QPR
#QPR loss widened from £10m to £16m, as revenue fell £16m (47%) from £34m to £18m, though expenses were cut £11m (24%) and profit on player sales increased £3m to £6m. Also impacted by £4.5m write-off of previous training ground development.
The main reason for #QPR £16m revenue reduction was broadcasting, which dropped £14m (62%) from £22m to £8m, as parachute payments stopped, though gate receipts were also down £1.4m (25%) from £5.4m to £4.0m, while commercial fell £1.4m (19%) from £7.2m to £5.8m.
Read 45 tweets
13 May
Quick estimate of the revenue earned by English clubs from Europe this season up to the final. This analysis is based on the participation fees, prize money and TV pools from 2019/20 distributions plus the UEFA coefficients for 2020/21 #MCFC #CFC #LFC #MUFC #AFC #THFC #LCFC
#MCFC and #CFC have both earned over €100m after reaching the Champions League final with €120m and €117m respectively, followed by #LFC €89m and #MUFC €76m. Europa League clubs receive significantly less: #AFC €29m after reaching semi-final, #THFC €21m and #LCFC €17m.
#MUFC €76m represents their total earnings from Europe, split into €62m from the Champions League (eliminated at the group stage) and €14m for reaching the Europa League final. Note: they only receive participation fee and UEFA coefficient from the senior competition.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(