Thread by @TheHorizonX

My Dutch twitter-thread in quick and dirty English "Questioning The Validity Of The #PCRtest From A Quality Management Perspective" 👉

https://twitter.com/TheHorizonX/status/1411550393641975813

The PCR test is/has been decisive for corona measures since the (so-called) outbreak of a “killer virus” @COVID19 . A Positive Corona-PCR test has completely turned our society upside down and continues to do so with freedom-restricting measures.👉

Besides the fact that the quickly put together PCR test has been declared completely inadequate and unreliable by many scientists, I wonder what the actual (legal) validity of the test is for the following reason: 👉

All COVID-19 test samples are run only once in different conditions so COVID-19 testing doesn’t have reproducibility and repeatability. further explained in detail 👉

Within the EU there are strict rules regarding the production and distribution of medicines. These rules are described in documents; Annex-1 to 17
Annex-1, the most comprehensive, 52 pages focuses on “Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal” Products” 👉

.. and Annex-15, 16 pages, “Qualification and Validation” For example, an important aspect is the continuous measurement of air quality in production areas measuring the number of particles present in this area. 👉

Another aspect is the validation of production surfaces with regard to purity (cleaning validation) No Costs or efforts are saved to show that values of particle (0.5µm – 5.0µm) limits are exceeded. If so all alarm bells go of and quality professionals turn into state of alarm 👉

Cross-contamination even goes a step further. Guidelines have been drawn up whereby the producer must demonstrate that the production surfaces of production resources such as equipment must be spick-and-span. 👉

The so-called MAC value (Maximum Allowable Carry-over) I’m talking about about measurements in picogram (0.00000000001 gram) Also a WC should be determined. Not your daily bathroom but the Worst-Case needs to be calculated. 👉

Again no costs or efforts are saved to ensure that the final product in bottle, tablet, powder or soft-gel arrives completely pure/clean (without contamination) at the pharmacy or drugstore. 👉

Back to the COVID-PCR test and the test locations. In busy times the locations house several sick / infected persons at the same time in 1 area. Coughing and spitting Virus RNA in the air. 👉

Who’s Who to show me that the virus particle detected by PCR is on my swab is actually mine; a swab taken in an area filled with aerosols (contaminated) from other people!? 👉

Who’s Who to show me that my swab is processed (daily with thousands at a time) according to the so-called GLP protocol (Good Laboratory Practices). 👉

Who’s Who to provide me with an overview of the so-called “chain-of-custody” Documentation covering the entire process of acquisition, transfer, handling and removal of materials. 👉

Overdone? Okay then at least provide me with a COA – Certificate of Analysis – a document containing the details of the specific test(s) / method(s) performed with associated values used… including of course the PCR-test CT value.👉

This story could be much longer and more detailed, but then it would become some sort of an annex summary with many pages… my conclusion in short: 👉

All COVID-19 test samples are run only once in different conditions so COVID-19 testing doesn’t have reproducibility and repeatability. And therefore the PCR test result is unreliable! 👉

You can also rad this story on thevirus.wtf/pcr item 37