Delhi High Court to hear plea filed by former Assistant Secretary-General at United Nations, Lakshmi Puri against allegedly defamatory tweets by Saket Gokhale @SaketGokhale@lakshmiunwomen
Hearing before Justice C Hari Shankar begins. Senior Advocate Maninder Singh appears for Puri.
How can you be vilifying people like this? Knock off these things from the website: Court
If you have any problem with public functionaries, you must go to them. Make necessary clarifications before you got to the public domain: Court
Singh: I am not holding any public office. I will demonstrate how mala fide this gentleman is. Such uncontrolled people. I have worked for 28 years in the service. During my leave, I worked with United Nations
I was finding a flat when I was on UN salary. I got a mortgage of Rs 10 lakh from UBS. This gentleman may only ask people who hold public office and not me: Singh
My elder daughter who is a banker in New York gave me 6 lakh Swiss francs and I had mortgage of 10 lakh Swiss francs. I have put these documents before Court; this man is no one to question me: Singh
United Nations salary is tax-free. I was on leave, not deputation as alleged by Gokhale. He knows everything. It is only an edifice created to blackmail me: Singh
Background to legal notice sent to Gokhale for his tweets:
Former UN officer Lakshmi Puri sends legal notice to activist Saket Gokhale for tweets alleging accumulation of disproportionate assets bit.ly/3hpWxtw
I could have put these documents in sealed cover to the Court, but I insisted otherwise. Let this be an example to people making allegations without accountability: Singh
Assets have been declared by Puri and her husband @HardeepSPuri in their respective capacities: Singh taking Court through money trail of purchase of house in Switzerland
It is a case of ex facie defamation. If I may use a Hindi phrase, it is a case of Ulta chor kotwal ko daante. When we sent the legal notice, he said he was being harassed: Singh
"This house in Switzerland was first declared by Hardeep Puri in his 2017 asset declaration as a member of the Union Cabinet." This is false, I have declared it to my employer in 2005: Singh
"For purchasing a house worth CHF 1.6 million, Puri would have to show: 1. Annual household income of CHF 3,00,000 (Rs. 2.4 crores) 2. Savings/equity of CHF 6,00,000 (Rs. 4.8 crores).NOT KNOWN!"
We had this, but is it none of his business: Singh
Whatever obligation I had to discharge is done. I do not hold public office to face these allegations. If he wants to put this in public domain. It is basic civility to ask me before he publishes this: Singh
I have made out a prima facie case and the balance of convenience is in my favour. There is conclusive evidence of defamation and harassment having taken place: Singh
If people who have served with utmost integrity and who have done things after retirement face this from people with no accountability, only the Court can save us: Singh
Assets of candidate and spouse should be matter of public record as per Supreme Court judgment in Lok Prahari. They have not declared the 6 lakh Swiss franc loan taken from daughter: Naved
Maninder Singh seeks to make rejoinder submissions. As per the 2018 Lok Prahari judgment, it is for Election Commission to frame rules for declaration of assets etc.
The foundation started building up from June 13. It is pre-designed attempt to defame. He makes it seem like I used black money to buy the flat in Switzerland: Singh
[Order] Detailed arguments have been heard. A query was put to Mr Naved as to whether his client had approached any official authority or sought clarification from plaintiff before tweets. He answered in the negative
[Order] A further query was put as to whether the law permits a voter who had grievance against a retired public servant to publish allegations against such persons on social platforms without seeking clarification. Mr Naved said no.
[Covid 19] Allahabad High Court to hear the suo moto COVID 19 matter shortly.
Earlier, the court had directed the government to inform the court about the steps being taken to upgrade the primary and secondary health care centers.
Manish Goyal, AAG: We were directed to file the status report about future planning and steps to tackle the pandemic. We have filed an affidavit in this regard.
Delhi High Court to hear plea seeking direction to Twitter India to appoint Resident Grievance Officer under IT Rules, 2021. On last date of hearing, Court had asked the social media platform when it would appoint such an officer
#BombayHighCourt is hearing two petitions assailing the Information Technology (Guidelines for intermediaries and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021.
Hearing before Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni.
Sr Adv Darius Khambatta for one of the petitioners, which is a digital news portal, states there are amendments which are required to be carried out in that petition.
Supreme Court to shortly hear a plea challenging the provisions dealing with restitution of conjugal rights since "court-mandated restitution of conjugal rights amounts to a "coercive act" on part of the state." #supremecourt#conjugalrights
The plea states that such a direction for restitution of conjugal rights is an infringement of one's sexual & decisional autonomy, right to privacy & dignity, and thus a violation of the right to life under Article 21 #supremecourt
Plea seeks Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and Section 22 of the Special Marriage Act to be struck down. Additionally, the enforcement of restitution of conjugal rights as provided for under Order XXI Rule 32 and 33 of the CPC is also sought to be struck down
Ghaziabad Video: Karnataka HC to shortly begin hearing a plea filed by Manish Maheshwari, an employee of Twitter Communications India Private Ltd challenging notice issued under Section 41A of CrPC.