Ghaziabad Video: Karnataka HC to shortly begin hearing a plea filed by Manish Maheshwari, an employee of Twitter Communications India Private Ltd challenging notice issued under Section 41A of CrPC.

#ghaziabadpolice

@manishm @TwitterIndia
Justice G Narendar will be bearing the plea.

#ghaziabadpolice

@TwitterIndia
@manishm
Follow this link to find out what happened in Court yesterday:


#ghaziabadpolice

@TwitterIndia
@manishm
Hearing begins.

Court: Mr Nagesh, why do you seek quashing of notice under S 41A? What grounds?

Nagesh: The notice is issued without jurisdiction, without sanction of law.

#KarnatakaHighCourt

@TwitterIndia
@manishm
Nagesh: Please let me take you through section 160. The other day I was saying, every time we read it, we find something new.

Court: We read it in the backdrop of the different facts.

#ghaziabadpolice

@TwitterIndia
@manishm
Nagesh reads section 160 of CrPC.

Legal obligation is for a person who resides at a place which is located within the territorial location of the police station. That is the legal obligation: Nagesh
This also has an exception. There is a 2013 Amendment. Even for 160 also, he cannot issue notice to a certain class of persons.

Court: Irrespective of where it is registered?

Nagesh: Yes.
Nagesh: This is a protection under law. Otherwise, they can harass people. I am in Bangalore...

The proverb is "If Mohammed can't go to the mountain, mountain has to go to him.

Let him come to me. I am not interested in hampering the investigation.
I said Icannot come personally, so investigate me virtually. But he was not happy. He did not do it because there is a hidden agenda : Nagesh

Nagesh: Court put to me what have I challenged?
The fall-out notice has been challenged.
Does it preclude him to issue a notice under 41A after issuing notice under 160? : Court

Law does not empower him to do so : Nagesh

On the 17th, they say I am a witness because notice issued under 160. No crime registered against me : Nagesh
If I do not fit in the classifications as to whom section 41 A notice can be issued, then there is no sanction of law. I would say that : Nagesh

Then I am entitled to invoke jurisdiction of this High Court under Art 226.

Nagesh reads out a judgement of the High Court
Nagesh: For me to invoke your lordship jurisdiction are threefold.
- I am resident of Bengaluru
- My office is in Bengaluru
- Notice came to be issued to be my official email Id which is based in Bangalore.

A part of the cause of action arose here, in this State.
That is my submission. I am not sure if milord will accept this submission : Nagesh
We will continue tomorrow, 2:30: Nagesh

Matter adjourned to July 9.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

8 Jul
[Covid 19] Allahabad High Court to hear the suo moto COVID 19 matter shortly.

Earlier, the court had directed the government to inform the court about the steps being taken to upgrade the primary and secondary health care centers.

#COVID19 #UttarPradesh
A bench of Chief Justice MN Bhandari and Justice Piyush Agarwal will be hearing the matter shortly.

#COVID19 #UttarPradesh
Court: What's the status, Mr. Goyal?

Manish Goyal, AAG: We were directed to file the status report about future planning and steps to tackle the pandemic. We have filed an affidavit in this regard.

#COVID19
Read 16 tweets
8 Jul
#BombayHighCourt to continue hearing the default bail application filed by Bhima Koregaon accused, advocate Sudha Bharadwaj.

Hearing before Justices SS Shinde and NJ Jamadar in physical set up.

#ElgarParishad
Adv Yug Mohit Chaudhry asks if the Court had the records which the Court had enquired in the previous hearing.

Court says that the record matches with what is submitted in the petition.

#ElgarParishad #BombayHighCourt
Court asks what the Supreme Court said in the issue pending before it.

#ElgarParishad #BombayHighCourt
Read 45 tweets
8 Jul
Delhi High Court to hear plea seeking direction to Twitter India to appoint Resident Grievance Officer under IT Rules, 2021. On last date of hearing, Court had asked the social media platform when it would appoint such an officer

#ITRules #Twitter #DelhiHighCourt @TwitterIndia
Senior Advocate Sajan Poovayya appears for Twitter India. Explains filing before Court.

Twitter Inc doesn't have an incorporated office in India.

#ITRules #Twitter #DelhiHighCourt
Chief Compliance Officer has been appointed as of July 6. We are in the process of setting up a permanent liaison office in India: Poovayya

#ITRules #Twitter #DelhiHighCourt
Read 23 tweets
8 Jul
#BombayHighCourt is hearing two petitions assailing the Information Technology (Guidelines for intermediaries and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021.

Hearing before Chief Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice GS Kulkarni.
Sr Adv Darius Khambatta for one of the petitioners, which is a digital news portal, states there are amendments which are required to be carried out in that petition.

#BombayHighCourt
Court: There is an original petition filed in the Supreme Court. There are multiple petitions also filed in other courts.

Khambata: There is only a transfer petition pending as per my knowledge.

#BombayHighCourt
Read 4 tweets
8 Jul
Supreme Court to shortly hear a plea challenging the provisions dealing with restitution of conjugal rights since "court-mandated restitution of conjugal rights amounts to a "coercive act" on part of the state."
#supremecourt #conjugalrights
The plea states that such a direction for restitution of conjugal rights is an infringement of one's sexual & decisional autonomy, right to privacy & dignity, and thus a violation of the right to life under Article 21
#supremecourt
Plea seeks Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act and Section 22 of the Special Marriage Act to be struck down. Additionally, the enforcement of restitution of conjugal rights as provided for under Order XXI Rule 32 and 33 of the CPC is also sought to be struck down
Read 4 tweets
8 Jul
#SupremeCourt to hear an appeal by Amazon challenging the March 22 order passed by a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court staying the Single Judge order which had directed the attachment of Future Group companies and Kishore Biyani's properties
@amazon @FutureGroup
Senior Advocate Harish Salve: the tribunal is starting hearing from Monday. The application challenging jurisdiction and to vacate emergency arbitrator hearing starts in 2 days

SC: Here the question is if the appeal is maintainable

#amazon #future #supremecourt
Senior Advocate: The matter is before the Singapore Tribunal

#supremecourt #futuregroup #amazon
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(