What if you or your doctor could accurately predict how long you had to live upon a new diagnosis of aggressive cancer (e.g. lung cancer or sarcoma)? I've faced that question both as a doctor and with a dearly beloved. On the one hand I know I would 1/ #ML#AI#mortality
do the utmost to beat the odds forward.com/scribe/470514/… and a gloomy prediction would be just another hurdle to overcome. On the other hand, a very accurate predictor of mortality upon diagnosis would be very useful: we might dispense w control arms in trials [at our peril] 2/
resulting in a Cox regression model with variables as shown in this nomogram generated for each patient dropbox.com/s/xvqu0avzhcx5… and hazard ratios most of which are expected (e.g. Albumin >3.5 g/dL HR 0.66 Obesity HR 0.88 Underweight HR 1.28) 5/
as summarized in this table dropbox.com/s/yw0tse242jbw… but combined in a model, the AUROCs consistently above 0.8 are impressive (although not sufficient for the functions referenced above) from 1 to 5 years of survival 6/
This tour de force in prediction is of course only a first step. Will model hold in other healthcare systems and what about a prospective trial? Also more diverse populations are needed (this cohort had 2.9% Black 2.4% Asian) and are available in other healthcare systems 7/
Overall, great example of application of #ML/#AI to real world health data to realize one of the goals of precision medicine nap.edu/catalog/13284/… and one that can be emulated and scaled broadly with full awareness of the analytic challenges/traps. end/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Dr. Bloom recovered #SARSCoV2 sequences that are closer to bats that any early 2020 human viral samples despite the order to destroy all early viral samples /2
Dr. Bloom applied equally insightful institutional sleuthing and sequence matching and evolutionary analysis to find sequences missing from the Short Read Archive @NIH but then resurrected their digital ghosts from @googlecloud /3
It's not just that they realized that the new variants were being coded by DNA with unusual intragenic splices and not because of errors in splicing and that these variants found in sporadic #Alzheimers were similar to those found in Familial #Alzheimers. CC @alzassociation
It's not just that they realized that the DNA was not germline but genomic cDNA (gencDNA) & was most likely generated by reverse transcriptase, the same enzyme that lets #HIV take over human cells leading to #AIDS@ALZHEIMERSread