Lekhi: This entire exercise by Deshmukh is to revisit the order of the High court ordering Preliminary Enquiry in April. This has been affirmed by the Supreme Court. What is being done is unwarranted.
Lekhi: Giving target of collecting money is not the ministers job nor of the policeman. Nothing is left to the policeman and even procedure is not spelt out by the minister.
The allegation is not hearsay as Waze told to #parambirsingh.
Mr. Lekhi, any department, one individual cannot do alone. As long as everyone is happy, no one complains. But the moment there is transfer then someone speaks.
Lekhi: The country should be thankful for the judiciary for keeping the conscience of the state. What stands out is that in spite of the allegation, there was no investigation and that is why the court had to intervene.
Lekhi is countering the judgments referred to by Sr Adv Desai to argue that CBI did not require sanction or previous approval from the Centre or State government.
Desai asks for a few minutes to make rejoinder on Lekhi’s arguments.
Court states that they will record in the order that Ms. Patil was given opportunity to make submissions, but she wasn’t present in the previous hearing and today’s and that they will reserve for orders.
Desai: Set of questions that the court will have to consider is if the statement is not treated as hearsay then why is it that there are no conspirators in the FIR? This entire exercise is to instil confidence…
Desai: The moral legitimacy of governance has to be held and there is no dispute in this. Politicians are also people. Why did the CBI not add the conspirators in the FIR? Why are the police officers not named in there? Is it because it was their own king?
Desai: Why did the agency refer the very same material which was used by the division bench to initiate enquiry. What is it that prompted them? It means they had no material..
Order: Dr Patil, respondent no 3, did not/ could not appear. ASG submitted that the investigation papers will be tendered by tomorrow in a sealed envelope. Closed for orders.
Court: We hope that to the satisfaction of all advocates we have heard you..
#BombayHighCourt at Goa grants leave to Goa government to permit fully vaccinated persons (with both certificates) in the State without a COVID negative test report till August 5 by way of ad-interim relief.
#SupremeCourt to hear a petition seeking to declare Section 17 of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 as unconstitutional as it requires that the primary FCRA account is to be opened exclusively in a branch of SBI New Delhi notified by Centre @TheOfficialSBI#FCRA
The plea says impugned Section 17 of FCRA, MHA Notification, as well as the public notices, violate Article 14 for bring arbitrary and unreasonable. @TheOfficialSBI#SUPREMECOURT
The writ petition states that a blanket requirement of
opening a bank account at one specific branch of the SBI, New Delhi for all organizations receiving FCRA is absurd, irrational, and serves no rational purpose under the FCRA or any other law. #fcra#supremecourt
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea to restrain social media platforms from carrying Islamophobic content on their timelines and to direct a CBI or NIA probe against Twitter and its users involved in putting out “inflammatory posts” #Islamophobia@socialmedia
The petition refers to how “massive publicity was given by the media that many of the positive cases of symptoms of coronavirus were found from Tablighi Jamaat at Nizamuddin in Delhi”. @KhajaAijazuddin#supremecourt
CJI NV Ramana led bench of the #SupremeCourt to shortly deliver orders on a plea challenging bail granted to a man accused of conspiring to murder his brother-in-law, who was eventually shot in front of his pregnant wife by a hired gun in an alleged case of #honourkilling
Uttar Pradesh Population Control Bill 2021 [Draft]
"Whoever, after the commencement of this Act, procreates more than two children in violation of the two child norm shall be disqualified to run for local authority or any body of local self-government."