Karnataka High Court to shortly hear a petition challenging decision of the State government to conduct SSLC examination for 2020-21.

The examination is scheduled to be held on July 19, 20.

#CancelExamsSaveLives #SSLC
Justices BV Nagarathna and Hanchate Sanjeevkumar will hear the petition.

#SSLC
#CancelExamsSaveLives
#CancelExamsSaveStudents
Hearing begins.
Petitioner Adv: Medical experts have said that new variants have come
Court: When is the exam?
AGA: 19 and 20.
Court: Only two days? How many hours?
AGA: Three hours.
Court: What whole day? 10:30 to 1:30? How many papers? Tell us the format.
Court: Are you condensing six days exam into two days? What happened last year? When was it conducted?
There was an order passed right?

AG: In June 2020. PIL was dismissed.
Court: So last year it was held.
Court: For any student, one board exam he was to face. That is in the interest of the student. It is for his profession, vocations. Parameters were different for PUC.
What are the parameters for this exam?

You are the petitioner. Tell us how many COVID cases are there: Court
Petitioner: 2000 in entire State.
Court: Has it not come down?

Court: It is made an encapsulated format, only for 2 days. It is in the interest of the students
One student shouts "We dont want exams".

Court: Who is this student? You cannot shout like this. This is not a market! Is this your client, petitioner?

Court: Centre passed the decision not to conduct exam when pandemic was at its peak. Now its the right time to conduct exams
It is not essay. MCQ is very easy now. Children are more smart than us. Format is different: Court

If State was decided to conduct exam keeping in mind the interest of students and covid situation, then why should we interfere?
If they don't want exam, let them not attend. Choice is there. It is three hours for three subjects. This is a boon, for average student also to pass the exam : Court

Everyone will get minimum passing marks, everyone will be passed in this format: AG
What about masks and social distancing: Court

This is the ideal time to hold exam. If they don't want to attend exam, let them not. Now they can attend exam with a board exam certificate. This is a boon! : Court
Why Karnataka State alone? Rest of the country don't have exams: Petitioner

Court: This is a policy decision. For NEET, CBSE Board exam, we were in May. Pandemic was at its peak. Pandemic was raging. Now we are in June.

#SSLC
#cancelExamsSaveStudent
Court: This is the best time to conduct exams. Offices are open, Courts are open. You have to show that there is arbitrariness. Otherwise we cannot interfere. Now we see no merit.

#SSLC
Court: Two things: This decision was taken after expert decision. Second, it is the choice of the students. Nobody is forcing them to write exam. Show us how it an arbitrary decision

#SSLC
#cancelExamsSaveStudent
AG: SOP issued. We will have only 12 students in a classroom. One desk for one student. There will be social distancing, health screening, 2 paramedical staff.

Last year Court had issued some directions. We have included that too.

Court: They have come up with SOP

#SSLC
All students who appear now will be declared as passed. Positivity rate of Karnataka is 1.48%: AG

We leave it to the choice of the Parents. If they want to send their child, let them. We don't know if tomorrow morning, we will get up or not. No one can predict.

#SSLC
What is arbitrary here? For all you know, no student or child may be affected. It is not 9 lakhs in one classroom! : Bench

Bench asks court officer to mute their mics.

#SSLC
#cancelExamsSaveStudent
#CancelAllExams
Studying for exam is different. Educating is different.

Pet Adv: Two students committed suicide.

Court: You have to make out a legal case, Article 14 - arbitrariness.

Pet Adv: This is an experiment.

#SSLC
#cancelExamsSaveStudent
Court: This is not an experiment. At least Karnataka students will have a certificate showing they have attended Board exam. Those arguments will not impress us.

#SSLC
#cancelExamsSaveStudent
Court starts dictating order.

There is an apprehension that third wave will come soon. It is stated that conduct of SSLC examination is not in interest of students.
It is averred that students are not in a position to appear for examination an account of COVID. ICSE and CBSE exams were cancelled and hence, many State govt cancelled board exams. Petitioner has assailed the notification deciding to conduct exams and timetable.
Heard all counsels.

Petitioner contended that only in the State of Karnataka, exams are being held, exposing 9 lakh to risk of covid. It is impossible for students to be prepared in three subjects at a a time, the same is stressful : Court
Therefore, students must be promoted without exam.
Per contra, AG submitted Statement of objections. AG said a circular has been issued, the SOP to be complied with while conducting SSLC exam in July 20, 21. He submitted that detailed SOP having regard to division Bench of this Court last year: Court

#sslc
#CancelExamsSaveLives
Court: In para 15, Court directed to conduct examination bearing in mind safety and health of students and teachers.

Conduct of examination was postponed but never cancelled.

#sslc
The said guidelines and instructions of technical advisory committee. Hence AG submitted that there is not merit in this petition and may be dismissed.

#sslc
Court: Judicial notice be taken on the fact that second wave of COVID-19 pandemic is presently heading in Karnataka. Positivity rate is 1.28%.

On opinion of technical advisory committee for conducting exam in the third week of July, decision was made.
Exam is in an encapsulated format by way of objective type questions. It is to ensure that students attend exams only for three hours in two days. Normally, it would have been for three hours, six days : Court
Court: Petitioner not able to make out how said format of exam in arbitrary in nature. Petitioner submitted that if students are forced to attend exam and they suffer from COVID. State would be responsible.
In this regard, we can only observe that no student would be forced to attend exams either by State or Parents. It would be collective decision of parents and students.

Unlike in the case of PUC, where data was available to assess students, there is no such data available....
...in so far as in school are concerned so as to simply promote them. We find that there is no arbitrariness in decision of the State to hold the examination.

In 19-20, COVID-19 pandemic was in the first wave when there was similar challenge made in June : Court
HC: Court was not inclined to interfere in the matter. In fact, it issued guidelines. The same was been incorporated as SOP.

We find that State has taken care to conduct exam by issuing SOP in form of circular to be complied with by all students, teachers and all stakeholders.
Petitioner not able to point out how State conducting exam is arbitrary. Hence, we do not find any merit in the petition.

Hence, petition is dismissed.

#sslc
#CancelExamsSaveLives
BREAKING: Karnataka HC dismisses challenge to conduct SSLC exams in the State, in July. Exam to happen as scheduled.

#sslc
#CancelExamsSaveLives
#CancelExamsSaveStudents
AG informs Court that Anexure R1 has nothing to do with the decision of State to conduct exam. Courts records the same in its order.

#sslc
#karnatakahighcourt
Court to petitioner: Why are you publicizing your petition? Everyone is writing about it.

You should not have advertised it.

#sslc
#CancelExamsSaveLives
#karnatakahighcourt
Court: Students need not be trained for this format. It is just ticking of answers, MCQ format.

They have one more week to study.

Matter ends. Bench rises.

#sslc
#CancelExamsSaveLives
#karnatakahighcourt
[BREAKING] Karnataka High Court upholds State government decision to conduct SSLC Examination for 2021

report by @Rintumariam

#karnatakahighcourt #sslc

@CMofKarnataka

Read more here: bityl.co/7n2P

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Bar & Bench

Bar & Bench Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @barandbench

12 Jul
#BombayHighCourt at Goa grants leave to Goa government to permit fully vaccinated persons (with both certificates) in the State without a COVID negative test report till August 5 by way of ad-interim relief.

Order by Justices MS Sonak and MS Jawalkar.

#COVID19 #Goa
The following categories are permitted:

1. The workforce, ie. persons who enter the State of Goa for purposes of work in industries, labour force, construction, etc;

2. The people who enter Goa for purposes of business;

#BombayHighCourt #Goa #COVID19
3. Residents of Goa who are now stranded outside Goa for the pandemic related or other such issues;

4. Residents of Goa who are required to travel for work, medical reasons, outside the state and return back after a few days.

#BombayHighCourt #Goa #COVID19
Read 6 tweets
12 Jul
#BombayHighCourt to hear plea filed by #AnilDeshmukh former Home Minister of #Maharashtra seeking quashing of the FIR registered by #CBI on the allegations of corruption made by former #MumbaiPolice Commissioner #ParamBirSingh.

@AnilDeshmukhNCP
@MumbaiPolice
Hearing before Bench of Justices SS Shinde and NJ Jamadar.

Sr Adv Amit Desai completed his submissions on behalf of Deshmukh.

ASG Aman Lekhi to continue with his submissions.

#BombayHighCourt #CBI #AnilDeshmukh #Maharashtra
Justice Shinde: We would like to see the investigation of papers. Will return in sealed covers

ASG Lekhi: Milords will have it by today. Meanwhile I have sent my written submissions.

#BombayHighCourt #CBI #Maharashtra
Read 34 tweets
12 Jul
#SupremeCourt to hear a petition seeking to declare Section 17 of the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 as unconstitutional as it requires that the primary FCRA account is to be opened exclusively in a branch of SBI New Delhi notified by Centre
@TheOfficialSBI #FCRA
The plea says impugned Section 17 of FCRA, MHA Notification, as well as the public notices, violate Article 14 for bring arbitrary and unreasonable.
@TheOfficialSBI #SUPREMECOURT
The writ petition states that a blanket requirement of
opening a bank account at one specific branch of the SBI, New Delhi for all organizations receiving FCRA is absurd, irrational, and serves no rational purpose under the FCRA or any other law.
#fcra #supremecourt
Read 4 tweets
12 Jul
#SupremeCourt to hear a plea to restrain social media platforms from carrying Islamophobic content on their timelines and to direct a CBI or NIA probe against Twitter and its users involved in putting out “inflammatory posts”
#Islamophobia @socialmedia
The petition refers to how “massive publicity was given by the media that many of the positive cases of symptoms of coronavirus were found from Tablighi Jamaat at Nizamuddin in Delhi”.
@KhajaAijazuddin #supremecourt
Matter to start shortly
#supremecourt #islamophobia #socialmedia
Read 10 tweets
12 Jul
CJI NV Ramana led bench of the #SupremeCourt to shortly deliver orders on a plea challenging bail granted to a man accused of conspiring to murder his brother-in-law, who was eventually shot in front of his pregnant wife by a hired gun in an alleged case of #honourkilling
Order being pronounced

CJI NV Ramana: We are of the view that the opinion passed by the HC is set aside. We direct the respondent to surrender before the district judge.

#SupremeCourt #HonourKilling
Read 5 tweets
10 Jul
Uttar Pradesh Population Control Bill 2021 [Draft]

"Whoever, after the commencement of this Act, procreates more than two children in violation of the two child norm shall be disqualified to run for local authority or any body of local self-government."

#PopulationControlBill Image
Draft UP Population Control bill proposes bar on couples who beget more than 2 children from availing welfare schemes, contesting local polls

Suggestions to be sent to Law Commission by July 19.

#UttarPradesh #PopulationControlLaw

FULL TEXT OF BILL: bityl.co/7lhu Image
Couple who procreates more than 2 children shall be subject to the following disincentives:

- Debarring from benefit of Government sponsored welfare schemes

- Limit of ration card Units upto four

- Bar on contesting election to Local Body etc.

Read: barandbench.com/news/litigatio… Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(