Some parasitic insects lay their eggs in other living things. The larvae hatch and eat the live host from the inside out, leaving an empty shell behind.
The Supreme Court is doing the same with the Voting Rights Act, state/church separation, and, coming soon, abortion rights.
SCOTUS is leaving behind the empty shells of the Voting Rights Act, the First Amendment, and reproductive rights, while not actually striking down any statutes or overturning any precedent. This one weird trick suggests incremental change, not massive legal rewrites.
It's dishonest, but also political. Directly striking down or overruling, for instance, the VRA would build more popular support to #ExpandTheCourt. So instead we get the Shelby County and Brnovich cases, which gut the VRA and leave us with an empty husk.
SCOTUS has done the same thing with religious freedom and state/church separation, rewriting the Constitution so that the latter is now hostile to the former, instead of protecting the principle that there is no freedom OF religion without a government that is free FROM religion.
It's very clearly going to do the same thing with abortion rights—has been doing so already. The justices have accepted a case to end Roe, but, if recent history repeats itself, they won't deliver a clear coup de gras, they'll leave Roe an empty hulk.
We tend to describe this caustic work as eating away at the edges of precedent, of our rights, but it's not. McConnell and the GOP have been laying eggs on the Supreme Court for decades and were furiously fecund under Trump.
These justices are eviscerating our most basic rights in a way that deliberately disguises the threat. They're on the court for a lifetime and will leave behind, not rights, but empty facades, empty shells, empty promises. It's time to #ExpandTheCourt.
The Supreme Court is going to hand down the decision on whether the Catholic Chruch’s foster care services in Philadelphia can discriminate against LGBTQ people any day now (Fulton v. Philadelphia). With this court, I’m not optimistic. Here’s what I’ll be looking for…
First, Sotomayor’s dissent. Because she’ll get it right. Read that first. I have little hope that she'll be writing the majority opinion. The Supreme Court is broken, politically packed, hopelessly Christian nationalist.
If you don’t know the Fulton case, it’s pretty simple....
Philadelphia takes care of foster children. It contracts out some of those responsibilities. Catholic Social Services is a contractor but refused to vet LGBTQ couples as potential foster parents or visit their homes. Why? Because Jesus.
I'm getting a lot of questions about the prayer before the #ImpeachmentTrial at the Senate. This #THREAD has your answers.
The prayer is given by Senate Chaplain Barry Black. Yes, the Senate has a chaplain. Yes, your tax dollars pay his salary. And the numbers are shocking:
From 2000-2015, Congress spent more than $10 million on prayers, the vast majority of which are to the Christian god (more than 96% of prayers in the House were Christian).
Do chaplains do other things? Sure. But they're paid to pray. The claim that they accommodate the religious freedom of Members of Congress may have made sense when DC was an unpopulated swamp...
Steven Hotze is a #ChristianNationalist radio host/TX GOP bigwig. You'll remember him as the guy that asked Gov Abbott to issue "shoot to kill" for #BlackLivesMatter protesters this summer.
Glad to see so many people waking up to threat #ChristianNationalism poses to our republic and our pluralistic democracy.
If you've just recognized this existential threat, welcome to the fight. It's not over because Trump is on his way out the door. There's a lot left to do.
@kathsstewart's The Power Worshippers is a great look at the power players and monied interests that drive CN. She opened the back of the watch and showed us the interlocking gears. amazon.com/Power-Worshipp…
Check out @C_Stroop's writings on #ChristianNationalism. As an #exvangelical, she's got a valuable perspective and is especially erudite and observant when it comes to the authoritarianism inherent in CN.
The Supreme Court did not determine or declare that we're a Christian nation. It said so in dicta: an unimportant aside not relevant to the case's holding.
The case involved a nativist law similar to Trump's Muslim ban. Here's what happened:
Congress passed the Alien Contract Labor Law (or Foran Act) in 1885. It said businesses couldn't sponsor foreign laborers (have them immigrate and then work for the companies). It was an extension of the racist Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882.
The court ruled that the law did not prevent churches from contracting to bring pastors from other countries to minister to their congregation. That’s it. It was an issue of statutory interpretation.
Meanwhile, the Supreme Court is about to hear argument in a case that might weaponinze religious freedom. Not only could it make "because god" a license to discriminate, it might also give discriminating religious orgs a right to contract with the government to provide services.
This case is not about faith, but whether adhering one particular brand of conservative Christianity is right that Trump's all others, including the rights of other Americans. This is about codifying Christian privilege in the Constitution.
The goal is to rewrite or redefine the Constitution so that it creates two classes of people: Christians and everyone else. Or to be more accurate, the right kind of conservative Christian, and everyone else.