"Media coverage that draws a false equivalence between one party operating in defense of democracy and another seeking to tear it down ... fails the most fundamental goal of journalism: to inform the public."
~@JRubinBlogger
"The false balance syndrome ironically enables the one party whose survival depends on deflection and obfuscation to triumph over one trying desperately to debunk serial lying."
~@JRubinBlogger
"What would accurate, morally defensible coverage look like?
First, instead of the “Republicans say” formulation, the most precise framing is more often than not “Republicans lied” or “Republicans offered a non sequitur.”"
~@JRubinBlogger
"Second, the media cannot allow Republicans to rewrite the past.... repeat McCarthy’s own words. As he said shortly after the attack, “The president bears responsibility for Wednesday’s attack on Congress by mob rioters.”"
~@JRubinBlogger
"Third, the media should stop accepting Republican definitions that distort reality ... those who seek to upend democratic elections and reject the rule of law ... are authoritarian or anti-democratic. Terminology matters."
~@JRubinBlogger
"Fourth, Republicans’ false assertions in other realms ...should not be taken at face value. Instead, the media should place such statements in the context of Republicans’ ongoing effort to subvert the will of voters."
~@JRubinBlogger
"Instead of repeating obvious lies (e.g., Republicans are concerned about election fraud), reporters are obligated to point out that Republicans’ false assertions flow from their overarching lie that the election was stolen."
~@JRubinBlogger
"Fifth, just as the former president’s unhinged speeches and emails (which often contain disinformation about the pandemic and 2020 election) get far too much attention, the incessant repetition of right-wing media propaganda serves to spread their noxious views"
"Sixth, it is incumbent on the media to describe the demeanor of Republicans more vividly. ...
Put differently, reporters should stop making MAGA leaders more reasonable than they are."
~@JRubinBlogger
"Seventh, the White House press corps must stop echoing false Republican talking points."
*****[YES, PLEASE!]*****
[Why do so many reporters just mindlessly repeat what they KNOW are lies over and over again?]
"Eighth, outlets should stop squeezing every issue into a political frame. ... When, for example, the commerce secretary is scheduled to appear in the briefing room, business and economics reporters should be asking the questions."
"When SB1 becomes law, we will breathe a sigh of relief that Texas elections — where voter fraud makes up a menacing .000185 percent of votes cast — will finally be deemed safe for the purposes of Republican campaign speeches"
"While five states conduct entire elections by mail, a county official in Texas who so much as mails residents applications to vote by mail, with instructions on determining whether they’re eligible, can now be charged with a state jail felony."
"Partisan poll watchers, with a history of harassing ... people of color, will have “free movement” within a polling place, although they must stop short of accompanying us into the voting booth. If they feel a poll worker has blocked their view, they can pursue criminal charges"
"It’s totally bizarre to me to say we want to keep the 60-vote threshold, but obviously, that’s not working, ... So we’re going to do this dumb thing and abuse another rule in a way that creates worse legislation instead."
~@ezraklein
"Mitch McConnell begins the session by filibustering the organizing resolution... So he starts out by saying, I will let you do nothing. I will not even let you build a Senate."
"you can feel the institution sort of reaching for the ability to pass things on a majority rule basis. & instead of going directly at the filibuster, they’re taking this detour through reconciliation ...it’s going to lead to extremely poor policy design"
"Biden’s big rescue package is ... going through budget reconciliation because it cannot get 10 Republican votes in the Senate. And so you are already seeing things get carved out of it that are important."
~@ezraklein
"The solutions, in a lot of cases, are right there. They often exist in legislative text. They’ve been road tested by experts. There’s not really a lot of controversy over what the solution should be. It’s just impossible to get them through the Senate."
"It’s not just that our priorities are wrong; food is not a national policy priority at all. We invest in, and care more about, the energy that drives our cars and trucks than the energy that drives our bodies."
~@chefjoseandres
"When the pandemic struck, the US Dept of Agriculture set aside $16 billion in emergency aid to farmers, who were by then destroying their crops, but spent only $3 billion to actually purchase their fresh produce, dairy products and meat and distribute them to the hungry."
"Restaurants, which had employed more than 12 million Americans before the pandemic, were closed by public order but received no bailout.
Airlines in the United States, which currently employ about 700,000 people worldwide, received $25 billion and carried right on flying."
"It’s the human resources we are running low on. ... it’s the human cost of caring for these patients that has been keeping me up at night the past couple of weeks and really making me nauseous every day."
"I’ve taken care of a lot of husband-wife patients, unfortunately. ...
She ended up passing. A few days after, he went home, and I didn’t see him, so I don’t know how he took it. He wasn’t able to see her before she passed."
"I started noticing that I was emotionally tired. I was physically completely exhausted. And I was beginning to question whether or not I could continue forward being a nurse at all. I was past my physical capacity."
Journalists do not need to spend more time trying to understand Trump voters and their refusal to accept Trump's loss.
We already understand Trump voters.
Most of us are just so appalled by that understanding that we have trouble believing it.
Those who follow Trump believe they are inherently superior to “others,” though exactly who those “others” are can vary from follower to follower (ex: BIPOC, women, LGBTQ+, immigrants, intellectuals, "city folk," the poor, the "elite", the pro-choice, etc…).
Trump followers want to be able to ACT on their feelings of superiority in varying ways – from being thoughtlessly inconsiderate to being intentionally intolerant – without facing any social or legal consequences for their actions.