Bashing #metaanalysis is as fashionable as ever, as always with hands up in the air. In response to a thread moaning the lack of added value of meta-analyses over individual studies, I realized I know of *many* meta-analyses that literally overturned whole fields.
So I want to start my alternative thread, in which instead the of the same old lamets, we list consequential meta-analyses in #Mentalhealth, which definitely provided more information than each and any single individual study.
These don't have to be methodologically flawless, because no study is. They do have to have a decent quality (which is much less of an elusive construct than oft presented). I will start with a few and update when I have time. Feel free to add to the collection. Order random.
Barth, Munder, Gerger et al network meta-analysis demonstrating minor differences between psychotherapies for depression.
(Updated by @pimcuijpers et al this year with similar results)
journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/a…
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.10…
Smit, Huibers, Ioannidis, et al.on the (lack of) effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic psychotherapy, followed by a flurry of re-analyses, comments etc.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22227111/
.@Toshi_FRKW et al showing that the waitlist might actually be harmful for the treatment of depression:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24697518/
My good friend @NaudetFlorian flipping network meta-analysis on its head by seemingly differential efficacy of placebos (yes, this means that you can use the method in an elegant way to show limitations of the method, which I think trump Twitter rants)
bmcmedicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.11…
.@Toshi_FRKW et al. on dismantling internet-based CBT for depression, using the most sophisticated IMO approach yet that combines component network meta-analysis with individual patient data:
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33957075/
Stafford, Jackson & @EvanMayoWilson on early intervention to prevent or delay transition to psychosis:
bmj.com/content/346/bm…
Leucht et al in a perspective-changing meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of general medicine and psychiatric medication.
cambridge.org/core/journals/…
(And our citation analysis showing how the message was distorted: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29183418/
.@eturnermd1 et al on selective publication of antidepressants, with a demonstration of the impact on apparent efficacy
nejm.org/doi/full/10.10…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ioana A. Cristea

Ioana A. Cristea Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IoanaA_Cristea

31 Oct 20
Our viewpoint "Preserving equipoise and performing randomized trials for COVID-19 social distancing interventions" with @NaudetFlorian and John Ioannidis @METRICStanford now in press @EpiPsychSci @CambridgeCore
cambridge.org/core/journals/…
In this viewpoint we make two main arguments. 1. There is equipoise for non-pharmacological interventions (NPI) for #SARSCoV2 #COVID19 containment because there is uncertainty re: the magnitude of both effectiveness & harms. Uncertainty is vast for some measures.
2. An agenda of randomized controlled trials of NPIs is both possible & feasible. We delineate measures that could be the focus on RCTs, along w/ issues related to designs, comparators (not advocating doing nothing!), outcomes (type, timing), obstacles & counterarguments to RCTs.
Read 8 tweets
31 May 20
My new & very likely most important paper of 2020 @TheLancetPsych #network #metaanalysis on the efficacy of cognitive bias modification for #anxiety or #depression in clinical or subclinical patients
(1st author @liviu_fodor, w/ @pimcuijpers @Toshi_FRKW )
thelancet.com/journals/lanps…
People who follow this field know I have been one of its first and unrelenting critics, starting with my meta-analysis in 2015 @TheBJPsych (again w/ @pimcuijpers) cambridge.org/core/journals/…, followed by others, including many viewpoints, comments & replies that I will spare you.
I was one of the first researchers to have explicitly state that maybe #CBM just does not work and there are no moderators or boundary conditions that can save it. But time passed, studies went on, the field continued to grow & adapt, and so maybe it was time for a reassessment.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(