BOOM! Payrolls growth of +943k in July, and unemployment down from 5.9% to 5.4%, and that's what a robust jobs report looks like.
Pretty helpful revisions add another +119k to May/June.
Volatility is a thing, so better to focus on the three month average of jobs gains running at +801k per month, which is pretty great, but also pretty necessary given the depth of the hole we're in.
Household survey shows employment grew +1,043k in July, roughly confirming the payrolls numbers.
Unemployment fell a lot because more people got jobs. Participation actually rose a tick (though it has further to go).
Some part of the story is changing seasonal patterns in hiring by schools -- related to their reopening -- and local government education jobs contributed +221k to July's payrolls growth.
Today's jobs data were collected in early July and reflect decisions made in June.
They're largely pre-Delta.
The most important economic variable is the spread of the virus (plus vaccines!) and these numbers say nothing about how Delta might cause the recovery to stall.
Another cold take: Taking one month's headline number to infer anything about the effects of UI benefits is a pretty dodgy proposition. Far better to dig into the state-by-state numbers, and thankfully we have this careful thread by @p_ganong:
As good as today's numbers are, the U.S. still has 6 million fewer jobs than it did pre-pandemic, and is about 8 million below the pre-pandemic trend. The labor market is still in a pretty deep hole, and we need a lot more numbers like today before we celebrate anything.
The misclassification issue (folks on temporary layoff being counted as employed) is still with us, so the "true" unemployment rate might be about 0.3%-points higher than reported.
Also none of our surveys are operating normally so there's greater uncertainty about everything.
Economic policy tip: Fiscal and monetary policy can't defeat sickness and fear, so the most important thing to keep this recovery rolling is continuing to get people vaccinated so that Delta can't derail it.
It turns out that there's robust agreement on this point within my household.
U.S. payrolls grew by +266k, which would be fabulous in normal times, but is utterly disappointing at a moment in which forecasters expected +1 million jobs, and we’re still missing millions of pre-pandemic jobs.
This is a big miss that changes how we think about the recovery.
Unemployment is stuck at 6.1%, well above the pre-pandemic rate of 3.5%, and that’s despite the fact that millions are still not looking for work.
We are still 8 million jobs below pre-pandemic levels, or about 10 million jobs below where we would have been if pre-covid trends had continued. That’s why we need much faster job growth.
There are millions in need, an economy that remains sick, and a recovery that’s ailing.
In December the U.S. economy lost -140,000 jobs, and THE RECOVERY HAS STALLED JUST LIKE I WARNED.
We lost 22 million jobs in Feb & March, then regained half of them, and now we've stalled, with the economy in a deeper jobs hole than the darkest days after the financial crisis.
The glimmer of good news here (and it's only a glimmer) is that October and November were stronger than we thought, and revisions added +135k to those months.
But there's no way around the depressing fact that the economy is in a hole as deep or deeper than anything following the financial crisis, the mechanical bounceback is behind us, and further progress has stalled.
Payrolls in November rose a mere +245k. That's the sort of number you might see in a "normal" month, and definitely not what you're hoping for in the snapback from a covid-induced shutdown.
THE RECOVERY IS STALLING.
Remember, the economy lost 22 million jobs, then gained roughly half of them back.
We still have 10 million fewer jobs than we did in February. Clawing the rest back at +245k per month will take basically forever. If this is the second half of the recovery, it's going to be grim
The dramatic ups and downs of recent months might hide the real story here: The economy is in a deep hole -- as deep as in the darkest days following the financial crisis -- and the recovery is faltering. Barely there. Making no progress. Stalled. Stopped.
To explain the inside joke: The more the coronavirus makes in-person interactions dangerous, the more valuable Zoom is.
So Zoom's stock crashing can signal that traders believe we're making progress in the war on the virus — like today's news about a potentially powerful vaccine.
A successful vaccine would be a huge boost for vast swathes of the (non-Zoom) economy. While the stock market is not the economy, the sharp rise in broad stock indices gives you a a sense of the tremendous optimism that this would be a huge boost.
Payrolls +638k in October, and the unemployment rate has fallen by a full percentage point to 6.9% (even as participation rose).
A very strong household report, with a weaker (but pretty much as expected) payrolls report.
Sadly, the payrolls report is usually more informative.
That unemployment rate is worth digging into. It comes from a separate survey, in which employment was reported to have grown by a massive 2.2 million.
This decline in unemployment occurred even as the labor force grew 724k.
It's good news, but from the less reliable survey.
Usually payrolls growth of +638k would be fantastic news. But right now, much less so.
The economy lost 22 million jobs Feb-Apr, and had made half of that back by Sept.
If we crawl back the remaining 11 million jobs at this rate, it'll take ages. The recovery is worryingly slow
Lemme tell you a little about why I'm not putting much weight on prediction markets this election. The short version is that the main US market, @PredictIt, is structured in a way that allows big mis-pricings to persist.
Right now, you can sell a share that pays $1 if Trump wins, for 40 cents. I would love to do that. But there are large transaction costs that get in the way, and they're so big that it would be wrong to infer that markets believe that Trump is anywhere near a 40% chance to win.
Let's say that I'm willing sell 1000 of these shares, effectively buying "Not Trump" shares for 60 cents. If so, I'll lose $600 if Trump wins. You might think that I stand to win $400 if Trump loses, but that's not quite the whole story, because transaction costs are a big deal.