The current debate centres on NSW's plan to ease restrictions at 70% double-dose vaccination of those aged 16+. That's equivalent to about 56% of the total population, though the added eligibility of 12-15s means more than 56% will have been double-vaccinated by the target.
2/🧵
Here's the plan. Briefly, fully vaccinated people will have access to:
- 5 visitors in a home, gatherings up to 20 outdoors,
- retail, hospitality,gyms, outdoor stadiums at 1 person per 4 m^2,
- weddings and funerals up to 50 guests,
- domestic travel
3/🧵
Israel had a wave of alpha in late 2020/early 2021, and imposed a long and strict lockdown which still failed to prevent a high peak in infections up to nearly 1,000/M/day (equivalent to 8,000/day in NSW).
5/🧵
Israel had an early and vigorous vaccination campaign in Jan-Mar 2021, and the receding alpha wave coincided with the increasing vaccination, which helped to drive down infections further.
6/🧵
Lockdown restrictions were first eased on 7 Feb 2021.
Further easing at 7 Mar (at 43% total pop vaxxed) included:
- Gatherings of 20 indoors/50 outdoors
- Indoor dining up to 100
- Places of worship
- Tourist attractions
Some gatherings required proof of vaccination.
7/🧵
Delta didn't arrive in Israel until June.
The delta wave was a surprise, given the success of vaccination against alpha.
8/🧵
Major restrictions were never re-imposed (though some restrictions were imposed such as mask requirements and work-from-home).
The resulting delta wave was larger than the alpha wave.
9/ 🧵
The story in Alberta is similar. I will leave out some details.
Alberta also came out of a non-delta wave as vaccination was starting to take off. However, in this case they set vaccination targets for reopening, in phases, at 50, 60, and 70% *single*-dose vaccination
10/🧵
The targets were reached on 1 June, 10 June, 1 July. Delta became dominant in Canada in mid-July.
Alberta initially took some actions to undermine the public health response, including scaling back asymptomatic testing and self-isolation.
11/🧵
Recently, in the face of a rising delta wave Alberta has done an about-face and reimposed restrictions.
The new restrictions are roughly equivalent to NSW's 70% targets. (Alberta has 71.4% eligible population fully vaccinated.)
Certainly Israel and Alberta have cautionary tales to tell!
But: Both went into delta with few restrictions, and neither seriously tried to suppress delta with public health measures, though Alberta did eventually re-impose restrictions, in face of higher infections.
13/🧵
No doubt some of this was political; in both cases, having crushed a covid wave while vaccination took off, I am certain there was a strong sense in the public and government that vaccination would protect against further waves, and this informed strategy.
14/🧵
I don't mean to open a debate about whether or not this was a good strategy.
The major lesson: Vaccination alone will not control delta.
NSW will need ongoing public health measures, monitoring, and likely targeted actions to suppress delta outbreaks.
15/🧵
Still, NSW will likely achieve much higher vaccination levels than Israel and Alberta.
Israel has 63% total pop vaccinated (equiv <80% of 16+), and Alberta has the lowest vaccination rate in Canada, 71.4% eligible population fully vaccinated.
16/🧵
NSW has so far shown it can suppress delta though public health measures, combined with some vaccination, to achieve R<1 without very high infection-acquired immunity - something Israel and Alberta never did.
17/🧵
What happens when public health measures begin to lift in NSW?
We don't know. But Israel and Alberta aren't good guides.
Next time I will discuss some success stories - countries that have controlled delta with low infections and moderate public health measures.
18/18🧵
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some more perspective on the mind-boggling modeling from @BurnetInstitute.
*No country* which has achieved 64% vax of total pop. (equivalent to 80% of 16+) has seen 110 deaths/million population in one month (predicted for VIC in January.
Many countries with high vax, low infection-acquired immunity, and nearly zero restrictions have death rates more than 10X lower (Finland, Norway, Denmark).
Hard to understand why VIC covid deaths should exceed those in other low-covid countries by >10X.
2/
Burnet Institute predicts VIC will see 11,600 cases/M and 110 deaths/M (deaths 0.93% of cases!) in Jan 2022.
Last month (19 Aug-18 Sep):
UK started at 65% total pop vaxxed, had 14,851 *reported* cases/M and 55.5 deaths/M (deadliest mo. of delta; deaths 0.37% of cases).
3/
The UK is often held up as a cautionary tale regarding covid and re-opening.
Let's have a look at what happened in the UK and see if there are parallels to what is happening in Australia.
Thread.
1/🧵
At the beginning of 2021 the UK was fighting a crushing wave of alpha with months of lockdown. As that wave receded, the UK began to release restrictions.
2/🧵
Restrictions were released at a very early stage of the vaccination program:
The UK "picnic day" and end of local-area restrictions to movement occurred on 29 March at 5.6% of total population vaxxed.
2)They don’t explain their assumptions about ongoing vaccination beyond 80%. This is key to understanding the model and it’s left unstated.
3)They say they adapt a peer-reviewed model, but that model was not used to model time-varying restrictions, and in fact did not include masks or lockdowns at all.
Here is a long/technical thread on my attempt to reverse-engineer the assumptions from the Doherty Institute report to the National Cabinet (linked) regarding delta severity, PHSM effectiveness, and vaccine effectiveness to match observations.
1/🧵 doherty.edu.au/uploads/conten…
Here are the figures from the Doherty Institute report. Note that there are a couple versions of these figures in the report; these assume the “all adults” strategy for vaccination.
2/🧵
The figures attempt to show graphically the effect of various interventions on the transmission potential (TP). TP is in essence R_eff, but calculated on the population level, as I understand it. When TP>1, cases grow, and TP<1, cases decline.
3/🧵
In short, the blog post takes public misconceptions about the technical report from Doherty, makes a cursory read of the report, repeats misconceptions, accuses Doherty of intentional scientific misconduct to lead Australia to disaster.
Crackpot stuff.
2/🧵
Not really worth taking apart. But it’s been retweeted by a number of figures who should really know better. So let’s take a look.
Doherty Institute report is here if you want to read along.