What does Sneller see to get such sudden FOMO for the old zombie that is Iofina #IOF? If you recall the name, it should produce revulsion but a few things have changed and there's a chance it may be about to make some money.
IOF produces Iodine in the US via O&G brine. Iodine is a beneficiary of industrial recovery generally and covid specifically - the largest use is used as x-ray contrast which may benefit demand from catch up on delayed hospital treatment.
And because it's 2021, inevitably:
Production is trapped on the wrong side of the Pacific: the two major production centres are Japan and Chile - so you have the obvious logistics issues for both and potentially politics for the latter.
IOF's production capacity is apparently limited not by plant capacity but by brine availability, therefore it should benefit as a derivative of a US onshore O&G recovery.
Late last year the company refi'd debt which roughly cut the cost in half and it's now levered 2-3x.
Iodine prices are ticking up, reported most recently between $36-$39
Q1 update reported "sales demand at pre-pandemic levels" and "record sales of iodine and specialty chemicals, as a result of a significant recovery in demand in the iodine market combined with the availability of crystalline iodine inventory that had been stockpiled in H2 2020."
H1 update described it as a "strong sales period with demand" and reports prices in the $35-37 range.
And that's about what about I've got on IOF. Here's what those who remember this one will probably recall, red everywhere. Valued at £300M+ on $18M revenues in the good old days
But underneath it seems to have been plugging on as they've kept building out capacity. The story of the covid period overall seems to be that sales volumes fell but into a higher price, keeping revenues stable.
If the idea is that volumes are at / above records combined with high (and increasing?) pricing, along with the refi - a beyond rough fag packet toy model can be made to come up with a PBT quite far in excess of anything previously.
PBT perhaps isn't a totally crazy proxy for FCF here. WC probably comes as a benefit given they're selling down covid stockpile, you could net that off against an increase in capex if you liked. £29M cap comes to an EV of about $50m vs about 7x EBITDA in the blue sky set of figs
Forgot to include - idea to check this out came from a suggestion from @Naan_Deal, who previously thought #SCE might be worth looking at last Spring..
Looks like the answer re: Sneller was that results were today - and they're excellent. Have boxed next to my optimisic FY case
Est run-rate shipments would exceed '16. Revs $20M, GM down 100bps, costs stable, CARES recognised - and debt dropped $3M. Annualised clean PBT ~$5M..🚀
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I think it's worth revisiting Aquis #AQX here in light of a couple of data points that have since come out.
There are three main parts to the co: a stock exchange (AQSE); a tech licencing biz and their multilateral trading facility (AQXE) - it's this last one I want to look at.
First is the RNS from earlier this month announcing their MTF (investopedia.com/terms/m/multil…) had achieved 6.2% market share. Across the €53.6B traded on AQXE in July, this came out to €1.7B a day.
Those 6.2% and €1.7B are quite significant numbers and I'll come back to them later
In the period since the beginning of 2018 market share has risen from 1.72% to that 6.2% above. Here's how that value traded looks.
Someone else has also since mentioned $JAKK to me - it's a (shitco) toy maker, similar to Character Group #CCT in the UK. CC's tweet mentions the refi, he has a point - I think there may be something here to play for, perhaps towards a double or so before the end of the year.
Company has cash of $80M + new debt of $99M (pink) repays difference on prior debt of $129M with cash on hand (green) so $50M cash + debt $99M
6,395 shares at $10.6, converts at $5.65 (purple) into $18.9M (blue) so + 3,345 shares = 9,740 / $103 cap & $20M prefs (grey) $172M EV
As you can see it's highly seasonal into Q3. Mgmt mentioned in the last (Q1) call that inventories are low. Typically they would be about $20M higher than here in Q2, so if we penalise the cash in the EV by that amount to account for inventory build we're at $192M
On the Bridgestone side of things, the sensors monitor all aspects of super-large mining trucks' tire condition and provide geofencing and advanced capabilities for. Beyond likely cashflows the optionality here is to expand within the B'Stone range.
Unfortunately this involves banks, turnarounds and LendingClub $LC but I think something potentially quite interesting may be happening here, due to this acquisition:
When I mentioned to Munger and Buffett the other day that I was reading up on LendingClub this was the reaction - and they're not too wrong: LC is crap
However, the business model is a little different these days and if my guess is right, it may all end up becoming little more than a vestigial artifact, like Chamath's legs
Where things stand now is that it's no longer so much a P2P lender.
For a long time I thought computational drug modelling really had only one listed company: $SLP
Turns out maybe not: Physiomics #PYC could be a decent candidate for a comp.
Growth is inflecting, it has optionalities and thanks to AIM obscurity it's on a fwd EV/Sales of 6.5x
I first bought $SLP in April 2013. I mention this to make the point that was long before the current bubble in futuristic healthcare stocks, or before SaaS was a thing, this was already a punishingly expensive sector.
Here are the multiples you would've seen back then
SLP was pure software to model drug absorption, sold on licence. It had incredible margins but slow, steady growth. In 2013 it did $10M in revs and in the most recent like-for-like split, FY19, it did $20: ~+10% a year or so
This is again the idea: Pfizer wants to get a powder version of the Covid vaccine in order to avoid the cold-chain issues and expenses associated with the first-gen vaccine