#Thread You need to keep talking about #caste to your dominant caste family members. Staying silent makes you complicit in casteist violence. It can be challenging, of course.
- What happens when you do try?
- What strategies should you use?
- Why you should do it.
What happens when you challenge a family member about their #casteism?
- They are shocked and/or in denial
- You are afraid of hurting them or provoking their fury.
- If you are dependent on them, they might threaten to or withdraw their support
- There is a lot of discomfort
- They may not be willing to change
Is it still worth it? YES!! In fact, this should not even be a question. You know best what you need for your survival but nothing changes if you don't rock the boat! Also, some people DO listen. UC (upper caste) people not talking about caste only makes a deadly system stronger.
What strategies to use?
- Begin with the basics—casteist people often don't see the humanity of those they have decided are "lesser" than them.
- Ask questions rather than lecturing
- Talk about what helped you change your own casteist mindset
- Listen to them carefully to find out what could help them make a shift
- Explain things clearly and firmly; give facts and figures where possible
- Draw boundaries (I will leave the room if.... etc.)
What to do if they don't listen?
- Get someone they'd listen to to do it
- Sometimes it has to be an ongoing conversation
- Send them links to anti-caste posts, articles, books
- Tell them you don't want them using casteist slurs, jokes, arguments around you
- Leave if they don't listen
- If your survival doesn't depend heavily on them, cut ties
Why should you do this if there are anti-caste activists? It's exhausting for people from marginalised castes to do the work. It's not "their" problem. It's a problem created by people from dominant castes.
There are people dying, facing violence, and being deprived of what is rightfully theirs—that's reason enough.
Can someone be too old or too young for the subject There are people who are "too young" and "too old" who still face casteist violence. So why should anyone be too young or too old to learn not to be casteist?
Is the comfort of UC people more important than the lives of those who suffer the most under the system The obvious answer lies in these questions!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#CallToAction This International Women’s Day, back our right to peaceful protest! Stand with these brave women attacked & arrested on trumped up charges in India- only for defending democracy. QT or RT this thread from now up to 8th March with the tags #RightToDissent#IWD2021
Disha Ravi, 22 years, Climate Rights Activist
Nikita Jacob, 30 years, Lawyer, Climate Rights Activist
YOUR ACTION IS REQUIRED TODAY!
The Indian government has set up a committee to rewrite all of our criminal laws and here's the big problem- (via @citizensspeakup)
YOUR CIVIL AND POLITICAL LIBERTIES ARE IN DANGER. Criminal laws define the limits of what we can do without fear of punishment. They are meant to have safeguards to ensure that the police, the government, and those in power can't jail, punish or kill people at will.
THERE IS A RISK OF DILUTION OF SAFEGUARDS!
All indications suggest that this committee has been set up to widen the net of criminal laws and to dilute what safeguards exist to prevent unfair prosecutions/persecution and wrongful convictions.
#Thread September is PCOS (Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome) Awareness Month!
The patriarchal gender bias in healthcare care practice and medicinal research has a negative impact on our well-being!
The impact is huge and diverse! People living with PCOS find it challenging to navigate through the bias that distorts research, diagnosis, and treatment. According to research, PCOS is fast becoming a modern epidemic, especially in Asia.
So what is it? PCOS is a common endocrine disorder that affects people with ovaries, with 20-25% womxn in India and around 1 in 10 womxn worldwide affected by it.
Terms such as "specially/differently-abled" or "divyaang" actually do less good and more harm. We find these terms derogatory. Well-intentioned as they may be, they have roots in ableist notions and imply that having a disability is bad.
When a person very clearly tells you that they prefer the terms "disabled" or "person with a disability" and if you start able-splaining them and ask them to use a different term, you are, in a way, denying the fact that they are disabled.
Death penalty for rapists does not lead to long term impact that ends rape and other gender-based harms & as feminists we unequivocally stand against all violations of human rights, including against the death penalty. 1/n
The most common reasons people supporting the death penalty for “heinous crimes” including gender-based violence is that such a punishment is deserved &/or that a punishment as harsh as the death penalty will deter more people from committing rape & symbolize zero tolerance 2/n
Yet, there is very little evidence which shows that the death penalty adequately serves as a deterrent. Most people when committing gender-based violence are less focused on how severe the punishment will be and more focused on the fact that they should not get caught 3/n