Gonna start a thread laying out a case as to why @EricBalchunas and I are putting odds at 75% for a Bitcoin Futures ETF coming to the U.S in October. Here's where we view the odds of the ETF getting first approval 1/x
Originally we had ProShares way out in front but as @DaveNadig pointed out in a note. And @tpsarofagis pointed out in the table below-- Valkyrie is the only product that's been filed without reference to Canadian Bitcoin ETFs or other Bitcoin related instruments for exposure 2/x
We have two thought processes here. The First: the SEC has already approved a mutual fund with this exact same Canadian BTC ETF language from ProFunds/Proshares -- BTCFX. So if they approved this why would they deny an ETF with the same language? profunds.com/prospectus/pro… 3/x
The 2nd is that Gensler was pretty damn explicit in his August 3rd comments that started this part of the Bitcoin ETF race -- about being "limited to CME bitcoin Futures". But i honestly feel like we're trying to read the tea leaves like people read the Fed minutes. Who knows 4/x
As to why we are bullish on approval there are a multitude of reasons. 1. Gensler understands crypto. But a key event was the SEC forcing VanEck & ProShares to withdraw their Eth Futures ETFs just 2 days after filing. But didn't for the bitcoin products.. 5/x
Another key event was Gensler's Sept 29 comments where he reiterated support. I mean I can't fathom the SEC deciding to include these comments voluntarily with plans to deny all those ETFs less than a month later. That just pyschopath level cruelty IMO if that happens.
6/x
We're definitely in the minority on our call here as evidenced by this Genesis Trading poll where 71% of respondents said the chances of a launch were 50/50 or less 7/x:
We've been getting lots of questions about size of the CME Bitcoin futures market too. I tweeted about this yesterday 8/x:
Going back a bit to the inclusion of Canadian ETFs. To me this makes sense. Its just another release valve different from moving out on the futures curve. Its logical. Especially after the shitstorm created by $USO in April 2020 when it hit position limits as oil went negative..
Here's my current list of every US/Canada crypto ETF filing (that I'm aware of). It's an absurdly long list and its been a long 8+ years. 10/x
So, what's after this assuming a futures ETF is approved this month? Not sure but it seems like the SEC may want more regulation on the underlying crypto market before approving a 'physical'/spot Bitcoin ETF. Even though we think that structure is a better product for investors.
All of that said. The SEC has pulled the rug on approval so many times before I can't help but wonder what's around the corner. We (and all the potential issuers) are basically Charlie brown trying to kick a football
Also gonna put it out there that we initially went on the record calling for an October approval back on August 24. Soooo we're not just jumping on the bandwagon out of nowhere :) ... Though we've been wrong plenty before haha

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Seyffart

James Seyffart Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JSeyff

30 Sep
Still doing work updating my $GBTC research primer. Complete destruction of GBTC's status as a leveraged bitcoin bet. Historically it almost always offered more extreme returns in either direction during moves. That has completely broken down with the current persistent discount.
If $GBTC is ever able to convert to an ETF and BTC price trend is positive during that time, it may act as a leverage play again as the discount closes. Who knows when/if that happens though. Still hasn't stopped $GBTC's trading dominance though. No other fund is remotely close.
The collapse into a discount also caused a collapse in people betting against $GBTC. No one wants to be short this thing right now -- don't blame them. Current short interest as percent of shares is 0.3% of shares. Down from a peak of 9.74%.
Read 4 tweets
23 Sep
Here's a thread with more stats/tables from my gold vs #Bitcoin note. This is my 3rd time doing a piece like this since 2018 and I find that each time gold bugs and bitcoiners both disagree with me on multiple points while favoring their respective side far far more heavily. 1/5
Difference in inflation statistics. 2/5
Use as a currency. 3/5
Read 5 tweets
8 Mar
I took my own dive into Ark ETFs last week as people came out to the wood-work to bash @CathieDWood and @ARKInvest. Sure there are risks for people to be concerned about but there's also a lot of misinformation out there. Market cap and liquidity of stocks showed no pattern.
Regression analysis showed nothing in most basic metrics like beta, market cap, liquidity, etc. But taking the firm's stakes in the underlying stocks and their liquidity relative to the size of its position showed a definitive pattern. Heres avg return by quintile in each metric.
When you take both metrics into account, the trend is pretty obvious. But this is just correlation and not necessarily causation in my view. It's possible that Ark's concentrated positions happen to be in stocks most sensitive to other external factors, like rising rates...
Read 14 tweets
10 Feb
Now available on @TheTerminal . Passively managed assets in U.S. ETFs and Mutual Funds sit right around 43% market share and passive is increasing at over 2 percentage points per year. Means we're likely to see majority passive by 2026. Likely earlier if there's a bear market...
If you're thinking, "I thought passive was already a majority?" that's probably from domestic equity funds. Which sit around 53.8% passive.
What i'm calling "Non-Domestic" sits around 41.5%. and puts the aggregate equity fund market at about 50.3% passive. But if international equities start offering relative positive performance to domestic, I expect that % to increase as well.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(